[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Former DCI Brennan Spokespeson Says Brennan Told By Durham He's Not Target Of Criminal Probe. A spokesperson for Brennan said Friday that Durham told the former DCI that he's not the subject or target of a criminal probe. How can that be? Isn't Durham aware how Brennan using his 'independent businesses that deal with Intelligence' attempted using them in the election process. Brennan has businesses in the IIO (Influence Intelligence Operation) . Brennan according to some former independent contractors used intelligence and software attempting to change/manipulate U.S. election outcomes. Should not these accusations against Brennan be investigated for criminal misconduct by Brennan? Mr. Durham was not election tampering or attempted tampering not a crime? Or is Durham's investigation nothing more than smoke-n-mirrors, another dog-n-pony show. image from external-content.duckduckgo.com https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/22/john-brennan-spoke-john-durham-part-review-russia-probe/3418778001/ J. Posted at 01:52 PM in government, Intelligence, J, Politics, Russiagate | Permalink Reblog (0) Comments Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post. Deap Brennan has a history of being very loose with the truth. He who opined as paid TV pundit that Trump would be facing mulitple criminal charges the very night before the Mueller Report came out. His later day excuse, I guess my sources were wrong. He has done this on several occasions - grabs the headlines ahead of the facts, but seeding the public with what he wants them to believe. Just so they doubt the truth when it finally comes out. I guess his makes him good at his counter-intelligence game, at least leaving half the population satisfied with the first untruth, not to bother themselves any further. Bottomline: maybe the truth or just as likely a compete fabrication. I just can't remember when he ever told the truth, so don't know if this is a 50:50 proposition. Other bottomline: Brennan flipped and has already plea bargained away any criminal charges. That would make him technically true, which remains good enough for government work. Brennan was smart enough to beat Clapper to become state's witness, and none of them liked Comey anyway. Posted by: Deap | 22 August 2020 at 03:32 PM Deap RedState has an interesting discussion about the nuances of this third party statement and why the interview was held at Langley - and not DC - different federal district court jurisdictions for each location. Team Barr already knows how difficult it has been to break through the Obama deep state federal courts in DC. - the east coast equivalent of the 9th District court out west --before President Trump finally brought some ideological balance to the 9th District's now sacred chambers. Posted by: Deap | 22 August 2020 at 04:13 PM EEngineer Or this is all gamesmanship: trying to force the other side to confirm or deny to ascertain their intentions... That in itself shows he's feeling the heat, otherwise there is no point in making the statement. Posted by: EEngineer | 22 August 2020 at 04:39 PM sbin If there was a functional justi3 department in America Brennan would be in jail Unfortunately accountability is for those not connected to .gov District of Corruption. Posted by: sbin | 22 August 2020 at 06:16 PM chris moffatt The swamp has no intention of punishing any of its loyal denizens who have only done what they were supposed to do. With the connivance of a politicised judiciary it will all be swept under the rug. Those who have been or will be punished are the outsiders associated with Trump. Now it's Bannon. Who next? And still nothing about Clinton's server crimes, corruption and self-dealing. It's too late now for retribution for any of them. They'll win or steal the election and then Trump himself will be the object of numerous criminal investigations. Posted by: chris moffatt | 22 August 2020 at 09:53 PM robt willmann If the interview was actually eight hours long, excluding breaks, that would be interesting. A well-prepared questioner can start to cover some ground in eight hours. Two important things are whether anybody will eventually be charged with a crime based on information that is not already public, and what non-public information will be made public. Posted by: robt willmann | 22 August 2020 at 10:15 PM TV News reports said that Brennan wad interviewed at CIA hq. How does that happen? Posted by: TV | 23 August 2020 at 12:06 AM Bill H "Or is Durham's investigation nothing more than smoke-n-mirrors, another dog-n-pony show." That sums it up in a nutshell. A bevvy of eternal optimists have been saying that the Durham Report would bring down the hammer of justice on the seditionists who have been attempting a coup, to which I have consistently responded, "Dream on." Posted by: Bill H | 23 August 2020 at 01:44 AM turcopolier TV Langley is in the federal court Eastern District of Virginia not in DC. Posted by: turcopolier | 23 August 2020 at 08:39 AM Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||