See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Why Kamala Harris will lose in November
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo ... ris_will_lose_in_november.html
Published: Sep 18, 2020
Author: Arnold Cusmariu
Post Date: 2020-09-19 17:54:24 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 1671
Comments: 37
Why Kamala Harris will lose in November By Arnold Cusmariu September 18, 2020 In a bit of chutzpah worthy of Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris told Americans during a roundtable to be ready for "a Harris administration, together with Joe Biden as the president of the United States." She quickly corrected herself, but by then, Humpty-Dumpty had crashed to the ground. A day later, talking about jobs and educational programs for military members and their families, Biden said this: For example, making it easy to carry your professional credentials with you from one state to another when your spouse moves. Harris- Biden administration is going to relaunch that effort and keep pushing further to make it easier for military spouses and veterans to find meaningful careers[.] What's going on here? Here are some scenarios. Take your pick. > Biden and Harris are both addle-brained; it's just a matter of degree. Though you didn't see this admitted on CNN or the rest of them, one key reason Hillary Clinton lost the election is that millions of Americans perceived Clinton, correctly, as an ambitious, heartless, corrupt, arrogant harpy. These attributes are also present in Harris, who is an AA/EOE "twofer" to boot: female and "person of color." The latter is why she got the V.P. spot, despite dropping out after a disastrous campaign for the top position. Americans absolutely detest arrogant politicians. A "Harris-Biden" or "Biden-Harris" administration is delusional. Forget about polls and other propaganda nonsense on the news, including Fox, claiming that the election will be close. It will be a blowout, because it's about sheer survival. The choice is simple: the rule of law or anarchy. Without blue lives, whom Republicans love and Democrats hate, we are at the mercy of the "mostly peaceful protesters" coddled by the Democrat press. We can't afford the security details Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have, paid for by taxpayers. Democrats have done absolutely nothing to disavow the rioting and the looting. On the contrary, there is a widespread and correct perception that they encouraged the mayhem, calculating that it would help elect them. This should boomerang and result in the removal of Nancy Pelosi as House speaker. President Trump will be able to work even more miracles with full congressional support during his second term. Poster Comment: Turn out the lights, the party's over.
> Joe is scared of Harris and the left generally and didn't dare correct her.
> Joe's wife wears the pants in the family, so he's used to being second.
> Joe was just reading from a script as usual, doing as he's told.
> Joe was afraid of being accused of sexism and/or racism if he corrected Harris.
> Harris thinks she's already in charge and doesn't need to clear anything with the Biden people.
> Harris was admitting what everyone knows: Biden is senile and won't be making decisions in their administration.
> Joe is often confused. He doesn't know where he is, which day it is, whether it's about Iraq or Iran, and so on.
> Joe was predicting who'll be running the show.
> Biden sees Harris as a female Obama and obediently put himself second, which is where he was for eight years. Old habits die hard.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Is it really true this is a priority for Harris? Perhas, as this has been a major issue facing the American voters for generations, right?
Harris is a psychopath, she is just trying to do away with State Bar qualifications so she can flood the country with UC Berkely flunkies.
political pro-wrestling. believe what you want. do you even know what B. A. R. stands for?
To my knowledge BAR is not an acronym, it refers to the (usually symbolic) line separating court officials/functionaries from spectators.
My father-in-law carried a BAR when he fought Germans to help make Europe safe for Jewish communism.
Brother, that is a beautiful rifle. I like .22 LR rifles. My wife loves my Ruger 10-22. I have a c. 1968 Belgian made Browning T-Bolt. We had a Weatherby Mark XXII when I was growing up. A few years ago I traded a like new pre-'68-ban Baby Browning .25 ACP for a Winchester 9422 lever action .22 LR. My great uncle worked for Winchester. He co-designed the M1 Carbine. Then he designed machine guns for aircraft.
If I had to choose only one caliber weapon to own, it would be the .22LR; and if I had to chose one maker, it would be Browning. The only thing I don't "like" about Browning is their beautiful high-gloss finishes which are almost too pretty to take into the field.
There are no replies to Comment # 23. End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestFor example, making it easy to carry your professional credentials with you from one state to another when your spouse moves. Harris- Biden administration is going to relaunch that effort and keep pushing further to make it easier for military spouses and veterans to find meaningful careers
#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)
#3. To: Dakmar (#2)
Harris is a psychopath, she is just trying to do away with State Bar qualifications so she can flood the country with UC Berkely flunkies.
#4. To: IRTorqued (#3)
#18. To: Dakmar, IRTorqued, BTP Holdings (#4)
#19. To: StraitGate (#18)
I have a BAR .22LR that's a sweet little tack-driver. Made from '77-'85, they're kinda rare.
#20. To: Lod (#19)
#23. To: StraitGate (#20)
Replies to Comment # 23.