Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Another institution is sad decline
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/
Published: Oct 23, 2020
Author: Irish savant
Post Date: 2020-10-23 11:05:23 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 815
Comments: 22

The Russian state security service (most commonly known as the KGB) without question set the gold standard in its field, consistently out-performing its Western counterparts despite operating on a fraction of their budget. Unlike the CIA they managed to infiltrate spies everywhere, into the very heart of the Western security establishment, time after time. And boy could they kill. At the peak of Stalin's Terror they were offing 7,000 victims per day. That's over two million a year. Admittedly achieving these quotas for Stalin meant that many an ordinary Dzho-in-the-street out walking his dog got swept up, his evening disappointingly ending with a bullet in the head. But the KGB could also operate with surgical precision, clinically taking out heavily-guarded targets like Trotsky and Bandera.

Which makes the ineptitude of their efforts to murder Sergei Skripal and his daughter as well as Alexei Navalny all the more amazing. Bizarre use of radioactive toxin elements placed on doors or slipped into cups of tea at airports seemingly designed to fail, or at best partially succeed. They all failed. The victims are up and walking around. For such a dangerous monster Putin - for we're left in no doubt that the attacks were personally ordered by him - must be unhappy with his agents. But this raises an awkward question for the Deep State war-mongers and their media whores trying to provoke Russia: Is Putin grossly incompetent or an arch-villain about to take over the world? You can't have it both ways.

The whole blame-the-Russians ploy is laughably improbable for two reasons. First had the Russians wanted to kill Navalny and Skripal they could have made them disappear while they were still in Russia. Second, on the highly-improbable assumption that they blundered on that score, are we really saying that KGB assassins were incapable of cleanly taking out a couple of unguarded civilians walking around the streets? Sadly it seems the public are applying the same levels of forensic skills to this nonsense as they are to the Covid-19 scam, buying into it with their brains in neutral. Our overlords must be so pleased at the ease with which they can dupe the population.

Now if only Putin would play ball we'd have a nice World War III on our hands.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#20. To: Ada (#0)

I consider it highly improbable that Russia was behind the Skripal poisoning in part precisely because the hit was done with such a flagrant Russian signature. It's one thing to take out a political opponent or backstabbing spy. It's quite another to do it with chemical weapons that earned a puppet/ally of Assad missile deliveries, and broadcast to the world that you were the one who did it and invite international condemnation, sanctions and expulsion of diplomats.

Putin is certainly smarter than that. He's very pragmatic and clever. You don't want to play chess against Putin.

It makes far more sense that the Skripal poisoning was carried out by a government that wanted Russia to be framed and damaged in the international community, just as happened. A country that was upset with Russia at the time.

At the time, Russia was intervening militarily in Syria attacking ISIS and driving back rebel forces. That's about the only thing they were involved with. So who would have been most upset with Russia's intervention in favor of Assad AND had the capability to create or recreate this chem weapon AND had the audacity to actually pull off the attack AND wouldn't care about the well being of the Skripals?

There's also the issue of Russian trust in spy exchanges being compromised. Who would want to trade spies with Russia if Russia is just going to off the spies they trade away later on? In any event, if Russia was going to off them, they could do it without releasing chemical weapons on the general public in a foreign country, which is an act of war.

Yes, the UK security blaming Russia for the attack simply because it was using a Russian created chem weapon is detective work worthy of Barney Fife.

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-10-26   14:36:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

        There are no replies to Comment # 20.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest