Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: US 2020 election could have the highest rate of voter turnout since 1908
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news ... ion-highest-rate-voter-turnout
Published: Oct 26, 2020
Author: Glen Hyskell
Post Date: 2020-10-26 11:09:20 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 567
Comments: 14

More than 50 million Americans have cast ballots in the US presidential election with 11 days to go in the campaign, a pace that could lead to the highest voter turnout in over a century, according to data from the US Elections Project on Friday.

The eye-popping figure is a sign of intense interest in the contest between Republican Donald Trump and Joe Biden, his Democratic challenger, as well as Americans’ desire to reduce their risk of exposure to Covid-19, which has killed more than 221,000 people across the United States.

Many states have expanded in-person early voting and mail-in ballots ahead of election day on 3 November, as a safer way to vote during the coronavirus pandemic.

The high level of early voting has led Michael McDonald, the University of Florida professor who administers the US Elections Project, to predict a record turnout of about 150 million, representing 65% of eligible voters, the highest rate since 1908.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: Horse (#0)

I wonder what was going on in 1908 that would have compelled everyone to vote? It was before women could vote.

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-10-26   19:11:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)

Politics was still very much a North vs. South thing. North being damnyankee Republican and South being Democrat. South Carolinians really hated Taft. Southeastern Kentucky and East Tennessee, where there was a lot of pro-Union sentiment during Lincoln's War, went heavily for Taft.

StraitGate  posted on  2020-10-26   20:07:29 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: StraitGate (#2)

That map shows the solid Democrat south, which was the result of the Civil War or the War Between the States. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-10-26   20:18:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: BTP Holdings (#3)

The North/South Republican/Democrat split preceded the War and precipitated the Secession of the Southern states.

From Wikipedia: "Here are the 1860 presidential election results by county, with darker shades indicating larger percentages for the winning candidate. Red is for Lincoln (Republican), blue is for Douglas (Northern Democratic), green is for Breckinridge (Southern Democratic), yellow is for Bell (Constitutional Union), and purple is for "Fusion" (Non-Republican/Democratic Fusion). South Carolina had no popular vote."

Note that the Northern Democrats were more concentrated near the South.

StraitGate  posted on  2020-10-26   22:56:23 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: StraitGate, BTP Holdings (#6)

Very interesting. The N/S divide indeed goes way back before the war -- we've basically been two completely separate cultures from the start or soon after.

The yankees' problem then as now was the they're more industrial and we're more agricultural. Urban and money types despise anything rural or agrarian -- think food grows on grocery shelves. It embarrasses their jaded, deracinated, materialistic, delusional selves.

www.davidrreynolds.org/_a...ankeeProbleminAmerica.pdf

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-10-27 00:27:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest