Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

History
See other History Articles

Title: America wasn’t founded on slavery in 1619 — but on Pilgrims’ ideals written in 1620
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://nypost.com/2020/11/07/ameri ... lavery-but-on-pilgrims-ideals/
Published: Nov 8, 2020
Author: Peter W. Wood
Post Date: 2020-11-08 10:53:56 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 967
Comments: 11

In August 1619, a pirate ship, the White Lion, stopped at Jamestown and traded twenty-some captive Africans for food. The Africans were treated as indentured servants and soon released.

Fifteen months later, in November 1620, an English ship blown off course on its way to Virginia ended up off the barren coast of Massachusetts. It landed more than one hundred men, women and children. Those voyagers founded Plymouth Colony.

Which event mattered more?

Last year The New York Times declared that the arrival of the captives in Virginia was the “true beginning” of America — an America the Times characterized as a “slavocracy.” The Times calls its campaign to promote this story The 1619 Project. In my new book, “1620,” I argue that the arrival of the Pilgrims along with dozens of non-Pilgrims (“strangers” as the Pilgrims called them) aboard the Mayflower is the real beginning of America.

Why? Because before this mixed group stepped ashore they signed an agreement, which we now call the Mayflower Compact. In that document they set aside their deep divisions and voluntarily joined together to govern themselves with “just and equal laws.” This was the very beginning of principled self-government among European settlers in the New World. The Mayflower Compact is not quite 200 words long but those words pack almost as much meaning as Jefferson distilled into the Declaration of Independence 156 years later, or Lincoln in 1863 condensed into the Gettysburg Address. Enlarge Image A sign commemorating the arrival of the first Africans is displayed at Chesapeake Bay, in Hampton, Virginia, U.S. A sign commemorates the arrival of the first slaves from Africa at Chesapeake Bay, Virginia.Reuters

The Mayflower Compact is a much humbler document than those two, but it has the advantage of being the first: the first time a mutually suspicious collection of settlers decided, without compulsion, to respect one another’s rights. Plymouth enacted its own laws, elected its own leaders, and after a winter of severe hardship, thrived as a peaceful self-governing community. Enlarge Image The New York Times Building, New York City.The New York Times has declared that America was built on slavery with its “1619 Project.”Alamy Stock Photo

Meanwhile, Virginia was run by a private company in England which allowed the settlers some limited choices. Jamestown’s place in American history is secure, but it never became the model for American independence or a template for self-government.

Americans have so long cherished the story of the Pilgrims surviving in the wilderness with the help of Native Americans that we sometimes forget why this tiny colony was so important to our history. It is because they invented a prototype of our republic. The New England town became the very model of American self-reliance and ordered liberty. Plymouth also lived in peace with its neighbors, the Wampanoags, in a treaty that was unbroken for more than fifty years.

As pioneers of later generations carved new towns out of the wilderness, they looked back to Plymouth as the ideal of how to form a moral community based on equality. The signers of the Mayflower Compact were both Pilgrims and Strangers, young and old, prosperous and poor. Hierarchy was ignored. Masters and servants both signed. We can see this now in the seeds of the egalitarian America that would eventually shake off British rule and the yoke of Old Europe’s class system. Enlarge Image 1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project by Peter W. Wood1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project by Peter W. Wood

By contrast, the arrival of those pirates in Jamestown with their twice-stolen African captives laid no foundation at all. Slavery was already present in the Americas but it wouldn’t take root in the English colonies until more than half a century later.

The New York Times portrays slavery as starting in Jamestown in 1619 and spreading from there to become the bedrock of American society. That’s a false history, a myth.

The Pilgrims have also been mythologized from time to time, but the difference is the Mayflower Compact truly is the precursor to 1776, and Plymouth the archetype of American self-government.

Peter Wood is president of the National Association of Scholars. His book, “1620: A Critical Response to the 1619 Project” (Encounter Books), is out Nov. 17.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: Ada (#0)

The Mayflower Compact governed these adventurers.

They very nearly starved the first winter since many of the non-religious Pilgrims had not contributed to the overall well being of the colony. Only help from the native Indians kept them from certain death due to starvation. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-08   12:30:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BTP Holdings, Cynicom, neoconsnailed (#1) (Edited)

They very nearly starved the first winter since many of the non-religious Pilgrims had not contributed to the overall well being of the colony.

I thought they were all Separatists, i.e., religious. What they weren't were farmers or fishermen. Mostly shopkeepers. Many were socialists and expected the workers to share with them. To put it not as nicely, many were lazy thieves.

In his History of Plymouth Plantation, the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years because they refused to work in the field. They preferred instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with "corruption," and with "confusion and discontent." The crops were small because "much was stolen both by night and day, before it became scarce eatable."

Ada  posted on  2020-11-08   16:02:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: Ada (#2)

I thought they were all Separatists, i.e., religious. What they weren't were farmers or fishermen. Mostly shopkeepers. Many were socialists and expected the workers to share with them. To put it not as nicely, many were lazy thieves.

Yes they left Britain because of religious persecution.

If it were not for the kindness of the native Americans showing them how to plant crops, they surely would have starved the following year. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-08 21:35:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest