[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Trump Wins Illegal Voting Case in Pennsylvania that Could Change Momentum of Election Trump Wins Illegal Voting Case in Pennsylvania that Could Change Momentum of Election Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf Establishment media outlets continue to force a Joe Biden win down the public’s throat because they know Democrats broke the rules, and a recent Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by the Trump Campaign proves it. President Donald Trump refuses to concede the election until every legal ballot is counted, and voter fraud lawsuits are resolved in the courts. A judge recently ruled that Pennsylvania’s Democrat Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar broke the law by extending the voting deadline when she saw Biden was trailing. Boockvar extended the deadline three days past the election for largely Democrat strongholds for first-time voters to produce identification. Trump 2020 lawyer Matt Morgan reportedly said the ruling “supported our continued assertion that the secretary of state continues to play fast and loose with statutory deadlines and has done so throughout this entire election.” Pennsylvania has been a hotbed of voter irregularity controversy as left-wing officials and biased judges tried to stack the deck in Joe Biden’s favor. Democrat judges made last-minute changes to how voting laws were to be applied. The move was clearly meant to improve their chances of winning seats in Congress and the White House. Republicans challenged the alterations. That case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court in the eleventh hour with conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., and Neil M. Gorsuch, declining to take up the case, but urged Democrat leaders to stop their partisan acting or else they would consider taking up the case after the election. “The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has issued a decree that squarely alters an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania legislature pursuant to its authority under the Constitution of the United States to make rules governing the conduct of elections for federal office,” Justice Alito reportedly wrote. “I reluctantly conclude that there is simply not enough time at this late date to decide the question before the election. Although the court denies the motion to expedite,” the petition “remains before us.” What Justice Alito is saying in laymen’s terms is the political activists posing as impartial judges made new law from the bench to help their party win an election. The recent Trump Campaign lawsuit victory will likely head to the U.S. Supreme Court with this action. Legal experts predict that undocumented votes will be set aside based on Pennsylvania’s election laws. Poster Comment: Trump has the Big Mo going for him. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||