Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Iran's Reckless Disregard for Its Nuclear Deal Shows Why We Can't Trust It
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.westernjournal.com/iran ... b2cbe92bd134c5466af5bccb4a232d
Published: Nov 16, 2020
Author: C. Douglas Golden
Post Date: 2020-11-20 09:55:03 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 73
Comments: 20

Iran's Reckless Disregard for Its Nuclear Deal Shows Why We Can't Trust It

By C. Douglas Golden

Published November 16, 2020 at 8:37am

Iran is still technically in a nuclear deal. It might be hard to tell since, after the Trump administration pulled America out of the 2015 agreement — known officially as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — Iran has been more or less pretending like the pact barely exists at all and that its responsibilities to other signatories are moot.

Further confirmation came last week when The Wall Street Journal first reported Iran had stockpiled over 12 times the amount of low-enriched uranium the JCPOA permitted it to have.

A report from the United Nations’ atomic watchdog agency obtained by The Journal also indicated Iran was continuing with its nuclear research and was looking to accelerate its stockpile of uranium.

“In its latest quarterly report, sent to member states and seen by The Wall Street Journal, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran had now accumulated a low-enriched uranium stockpile of 2,443 kilograms. That compares with a limit of 203 kg under the nuclear deal,” the outlet reported Wednesday.

The report also detailed inadequate explanations for uranium the Iranian regime says it discovered at a site that Western countries thought was used to store nuclear material and equipment for a weapons program from the 1990s and 2000s.

A letter from the IAEA to Iran, detailed in the report, said the Islamic Republic’s account of how the material was found was “not technically credible.”

“In a footnote to the report, it said the material found at the site was similar to traces found on centrifuges imported into Iran by Pakistan, as detailed in a report in 2008,” The Journal reported.

The news further complicates any plans for the United States to return to the deal under a potential Biden administration. Former Vice President Joe Biden has expressed his willingness to return to the deal once Iran returns to compliance with its terms.

Former Biden aide Amos Hochstein, for one, told Israeli television Nov. 8 that returning to the deal is “high on [Biden’s] agenda.”

“I believe that in the first months [of his presidency], we’ll either see him rejoin the deal fully, or what I would call ‘JCPOA- minus,’ meaning lifting sanctions in exchange for suspending some of the Iranian nuclear programs [developed] in the past three years,” Hochstein said, according to the Times of Israel.

However, he said Biden would demand “some changes.”

This would include the sunset provision for the deal, widely seen as the biggest failure of the first agreement; under the deal, Iran could return to stockpiling uranium as early as 2030, meaning the JCPOA did little but offer Iran massive sanctions relief in order to kick the can further down the road.

In addition, Axios noted a return to the deal by the United States would be opposed by three countries: Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

All three nations believe the JCPOA does nothing to counter the biggest threats from Iran: its proxy forces in countries such as Yemen and Lebanon, its missile program and its regional ambitions.

If Biden wants to make “some changes,” as Hochstein said, he’ll also have to contend with the fact Iran wants to make changes of its own — most of which run counter to the U.S. desire to make the deal tighter.

On Nov. 8, the day after the American mainstream media declared the presidential race for Biden, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said he’d be willing to let the Americans back into the deal provided there was remuneration.

“Now, an opportunity has come up for the next U.S. administration to compensate for past mistakes and return to the path of complying with international agreements through respect of international norms,” Rouhani said through Iranian state media, according to The Associated Press.

“The people of Iran, though their heroic resistance against the imposed economic war, proved that the U.S. maximum pressure policy was doomed to fail,” Rouhani said, adding that Iran “considers constructive engagement with the world as a strategy.”

While some have argued the reimposition of sanctions by the Trump administration can be effectively circumvented by the Iranians — The Washington Post reported Monday that Iran was not-so-secretly shipping oil abroad — the general consensus is the strategy has been crippling, with Iran’s gross domestic product contracting 7.59 percent in 2019.

The Trump administration unveiled a new set of sanctions against Iran before the election.

But it’s still supposed to be in the deal, right? Well, after the United States pulled out, Iran has used its violations of the JCPOA to get the other P5+1 signatories — China, France, Russia and the United Kingdom, plus Germany — to pressure the United States into removing the sanctions and coming back to the flawed agreement.

And keep in mind, while Rouhani is demanding remuneration and apologies from the United States, he’s actually among Iran’s moderates.

The hardline faction won big in parliamentary elections earlier this year, not a good portent for next year’s presidential elections.

Rouhani is ineligible for another term, and a repeat of the parliamentary polls would mean dealing with an even more belligerent Iranian president, one who clearly won’t be willing to fix what’s wrong with the deal — if he even abides by it.

Iran can’t be trusted to live up to its promises now. Returning to the deal would be an abject failure of American foreign policy — not without Iran in compliance, willing to accept tighter checks on its compliance and ready to fix what doomed the deal in the first place.


Poster Comment:

The Israelis destroyed the Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz many years ago. It seems apparent now they have been rebuilt.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

HAAAAAAA! That is a scream! Oh please, MORE comedy!

Them Ayrabs is COMIN TO GET US aright!!!

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-11-20   9:56:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

Them Ayrabs is COMIN TO GET US aright!!!

If them Persians don't get us first!

StraitGate  posted on  2020-11-20   10:18:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Iran is still technically in a nuclear deal. It might be hard to tell since, after the Trump administration pulled America out of the 2015 agreement — known officially as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — Iran has been more or less pretending like the pact barely exists at all and that its responsibilities to other signatories are moot.

No, the agreement is no longer operative when the US withdrew from it.

Ada  posted on  2020-11-20   10:24:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

Them Ayrabs is COMIN TO GET US aright!!!

Remember what Ahmadinejad said, "The Israeli regime is illegitimate and needs to be erased from the face of time."

Also recall that JFK was opposed to the Israeli development of nuclear weapons. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   10:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Regardless, if Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons, why should the USA, Israel, etc., be allowed to have nuclear weapons.

DWornock  posted on  2020-11-20   10:50:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: DWornock (#5) (Edited)

if Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons, why should the USA, Israel, etc., be allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Pakistan is one country with nukes that is not a signatory to the U.N. NPT treaty. This means they likely have passed on nuclear secrets to other nations.

The Saudis have hinted at this when the Russians were helping Assad to beat ISIS. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   11:00:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BTP Holdings (#4)

Please don't post idiotic scare porn.

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-11-20   11:16:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: StraitGate (#2)

Oh my God, I forgot to be afraid of THEM!

But now I am again 0:-}

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-11-20   11:17:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#7)

Please don't post idiotic scare porn.

Iran has fuel-air explosives. After the U.S. killed that Iranian General in Iraq, Iran launched missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iraq. Damages were limited. But if they had used fuel-air explosives casualties would have mounted.

Do you think Patriot missiles could defend Israel from fuel-air missile attacks? ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   11:27:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

The USA controls some 90% of deal compliance on the terms, so without the US involved, there is no deal.

I think I remember Ron Paul's exec director on the liberty report, forget his name for the moment, saying that the reason Iran's stock pile of low grade uranium is growing is because the sanctions won't allow them to export it, which they normally did under the agreement. Not sure of details on that claim but wouldn't surprise me.

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-11-20   11:46:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: 4 (#0)

I hope Russia and China hand Iran 200 nukes and televise their delivery live.

Another Voice (Rev. 18:4) "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues."

Screen Name  posted on  2020-11-20   14:29:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: BTP Holdings (#9)

Iran launched missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iraq.

Why the hell shouldn't they? What are you, a Zionist all of a sudden?

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-11-20   14:48:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)

What are you, a Zionist all of a sudden?

Not at all. I was simply stating facts. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   17:12:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Screen Name (#11)

I hope Russia and China hand Iran 200 nukes

Russia could not do that since they have ratified the NPT. China has only acceded. ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_Treaty_ on_the_Non- Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons#:~:text=The%20treaty%20recognizes%2 0five%20states%20as%20nuclear- weapon%20states%3A,and%20France%20acceded%20to%20the%20treaty%20in%2 01992.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   17:23:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: BTP Holdings (#13)

Those aren't facts, they're hysterical neocon screeching.

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-11-20   17:23:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: BTP Holdings, 4um (#4)

Also recall that JFK was opposed to the Israeli development of nuclear weapons.

How'd that work out for him?

Oh, yeah. Nevermind.

The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. - Dr. Eldon Tyrell

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2020-11-20   17:46:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Esso (#16)

Oh, yeah. Nevermind.

After Jack Ruby (Reubenstein) shot and killed Lee Harvey Oswald, a reporter asked Ruby. "Jack, how could this happen?"

Ruby replied, "If Adlai Stephenson were Vice President this never would have happened." :-/

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-11-20   17:51:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: BTP Holdings (#14)

Russia could not do that since they have ratified the NPT. China has only acceded. ;)

Since the USA can disregard every treaty they every made, why do you think that Russia and Can't do the same?

DWornock  posted on  2020-11-20   17:59:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Screen Name, 4um (#11) (Edited)

I hope Russia and China hand Iran 200 nukes and televise their delivery live.

DAMN DUDE! I LIKE IT! You really tickled my cynical bone with that one. I'm a little jealous that I didn't come up it.

(Edit) You're definitely invited to my next Jerimiah Weed party.

The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. - Dr. Eldon Tyrell

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2020-11-20   18:03:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

The Israelis destroyed the Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz many years ago. It seems apparent now they have been rebuilt.

rerun you are once again mistaken it was in Iraq


I used to be in a hurry, then I figured out I was just getting nowhere fast.

IRTorqued  posted on  2020-11-20   19:10:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest