Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Tucker Carlson Reveals What He Thinks Is the Real Reason for the Massive Military Presence in DC
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.westernjournal.com/tuck ... ing&ff_content=western-journal
Published: Jan 19, 2021
Author: Grant Atkinson
Post Date: 2021-01-19 18:03:00 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 179
Comments: 14

Tucker Carlson Reveals What He Thinks Is the Real Reason for the Massive Military Presence in DC

By Grant Atkinson

Published January 19, 2021 at 11:46am

Since the Jan. 6 riots on the U.S. Capitol building, troops have descended on Washington, D.C., in mass numbers, for President-elect Joe Biden’s Jan. 20 inauguration.

While lawmakers and the establishment media say the troops are meant to protect the capital city from violence, Fox News host Tucker Carlson is not so sure.

“So no matter what they are telling you, those 26,000 federal troops are not there for your safety,” Carlson said on Monday night’s segment of “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

“Instead, unmistakably, the Democratic Party is using those troops to send the rest of us a message about power: ‘We’re in charge now.'”

This quote is sure to stir up controversy, but Carlson has a point. It’s a point that he goes on to back up with facts and logical reasoning.

The number of troops in Washington, D.C., currently, according to Carlson, is “more than twice the number of troops that President Lyndon Johnson ordered to Washington in April of 1968.”

As many Americans are aware, April 1968 was a month in which massive riots took place in the capital city in response to Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination.

“More than a thousand people were injured in those riots, and at least 13 of them died,” Carlson said.

In comparison, he said there are three confirmed deaths from the Jan. 6 riots, one of which was an unarmed protester being shot by police.

From purely a numbers standpoint, Carlson is right. Washington, D.C., was in far more danger in April 1968 than it is now, and yet lawmakers have ordered double the number of troops this time around.

Unfortunately, we don’t even have to go all the way back to 1968 to see the hypocrisy of lawmakers’ responses to riots.

Just a few months ago, Washington, D.C., was one of many major American cities under siege due to riots in the wake of George Floyd’s death.

According to the Military Times, the number of troops deployed to the capital city during the summer was much lower than the amount scheduled to be at Biden’s inauguration.

The outlet reported that there were about 4,900 National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., on June 7 during the Floyd riots, and “only about 1,500 troops were on the streets at any given time.”

Despite what the establishment media may say, those riots were not “mostly peaceful.” Candace Owens, a D.C. resident and conservative commentator, tweeted that in her experience, the riots this summer were more destructive than the Capitol Hill incursion.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

During the Capitol incursion, someone got Pelousy's laptop which had National Security information on it. That could be the most damaging part of the incursion itself. She left it behind when she fled, and that was pure carelessness and stupidity.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

But wait... it was supposedly picked up my special forces and in the hands of Trump!!! Turns out it was some chick who tried to sell it to Russian Intelligence.

All those assholes peddling hope that Trump was going to use the Insurrection act were truly idiotic. As if Trump plays 5d chess. Scott Mackay has been going on about how this was a Military presidency and if he meant utterly inept and at the mercy of traitors, then yes he was right.

This nonsense of a troop build up is a joke. Everyone said Biden would not be president. Even I believed the lie. Here we are... soon to be under communism starting tomorrow.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2021-01-19   18:20:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#1)

Turns out it was some chick who tried to sell it to Russian Intelligence.

Seems a bit odd as a real Trump supporter would be unlikely to want to sell it to any foreign power.

Pinguinite  posted on  2021-01-19   18:49:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pinguinite, TommyTheMadArtist (#3)

Seems a bit odd as a real Trump supporter would be unlikely to want to sell it to any foreign power.

I think it was more than likely a domestic intelligence agent that snagged it.

Recall the email scandals with Hillary using unsecure servers, and even some of those emails ending up on someone else's laptop, though I cannot recall the name of the individual. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2021-01-19   19:03:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

#7. To: BTP Holdings, 4um (#5)

I think it was more than likely a domestic intelligence agent that snagged it.

Then that means it was sent to China. They don't need it, they already have the goods.

I'm surprised our benevolent tech overlords let my internet run long enough to read this.

Esso  posted on  2021-01-19 19:16:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest