Theres a news story about a US military convoy entering Syria being shared around social media with captions claiming that President Biden is already invading Syria which is getting tons of shares in both right-wing and left anti-imperialist circles. The virality of these shares has inspired clickbait titles like Joe Biden Invades Syria with Convoy of US Troops and Choppers on First Full Day as President, which are being shared with equal virality.
But if you read the original report everyone jumped on, accurately titled US military convoy enters northeast Syria: report, you dont have to read too far to get to this line: Other local media report that such maneuvers are not unusual as the US often moves transfers equipment between Iraq and Syria.
So while this is a movement of troops between illegitimate military occupations which have no business existing in either country, it is nothing new and would have been happening regardless of which candidate had won the last US presidential election.
Another inaccurate narrative thats gone completely viral is the claim that Biden is sending more troops to Iraq. This one traces back to a single Twitter post by some Trumpy account with the handle @amuse who shared a Jerusalem Post article with the caption BREAKING: President Biden is considering reversing Trumps drawdown in Iraq by adding thousands of troops to combat growing terror threats in the region as evidenced by Thursdays attack near the US embassy.
If you read the actual JPost article titled Baghdad bombing could be the Biden admins first challenge you will see that it contains no such claim, and if you were to search a bit you would find @amuse claiming that they were sharing something theyd learned from sources in DC instead of accurately summarizing the contents of the article. Unless you know this person and know them to be consistently trustworthy, there is no valid reason to believe claims allegedly said by alleged anonymous sources to some openly partisan anonymous account on Twitter.
But the bogus tweet was amplified by many influential accounts, most notably by Donald Trump Jr with the caption Getting back into wars on the first full day. The Swamp/War Inc. is thrilled right now. Its virality then caused it to work its way outward to dupe many well- meaning anti-imperialists (myself included until I looked into it) who are vigilant against Bidens notorious warmongering, and now theres a widespread narrative throughout every part of the ideological spectrum that Biden is escalating warmongering in both Syria and Iraq.
It is entirely possibleprobable eventhat reliable warmonger Joe Biden will end up sending more US troops to Iraq and Syria at some point during his administration. But if the antiwar community keeps staring at the movement of ground troops with hypervigilant intensity, they wont be paying enough attention to the areas where the more deadly aspects of Bidens hawkishness are likely to manifest.
Trumps base has been forcefully pushing the narrative that the previous president didnt start any new wars, which while technically true ignores his murderous actions like vetoing the bill to save Yemen from US-backed genocide and actively blocking aid to its people, murdering untold tens of thousands of Venezuelans with starvation sanctions, rolling out many world-threatening cold war escalations against Russia, engaging in insane brinkmanship with Iran, greatly increasing the number of bombs dropped per day from the previous administration, killing record numbers of civilians, and reducing military accountability for those airstrikes. Trump may not have started any new wars, but he kept the old ones going and inflamed some of them. Just because you dont start any new wars doesnt mean youre not a warmonger.
Rather than a throwback to new wars and the old-school ground invasions of the Bush era, the warmongering well be seeing from the Biden administration is more likely to look like this. More starvation sanctions. More proxy conflicts. More cold war. More coups. More special ops. More drone strikes. More slow motion strangulation, less ham-fisted overt warfare.
It is certainly possible that Biden could launch a new full-scale war; the empire is in desperate straits right now, and it could turn out that a very desperate maneuver is needed to maintain global domination. But that isnt the method that it has favored lately. The US empire much prefers nowadays to pour its resources into less visible acts of violence like economic siege warfare and arming proxy militias; the Iraq invasion left Americans so bitter toward conventional war that any more of it would increase the risk of an actual antiwar movement in the United States, which would be disastrous for the empire. So rather than tempt fate with the bad publicity of flag-draped coffins flying home by the thousands again imperialism is now served up with a bit more subtlety, with the military playing more of a backup role to guard the infrastructure of this new approach.
It appears clear that this would be the Biden administrations preferred method of warmongering if given the choice based on whos going to be in it. The incoming Secretary of State Tony Blinken now advocates replacing the old Bush model of full-scale war with discreet, small-scale sustainable operations, maybe led by special forces, to support local actors. Bidens nominee for CIA Director William Burns urged caution in the lead-up to the Iraq invasion and later expressed regret that he didnt push back against it. Rather than picking bloodthirsty psychopath Michele Flournoy for Defense Secretary as many expected, Biden went with the less cartoonishly evil Raytheon board member Lloyd J. Austin III. All this while depraved coupmonger Victoria Nuland is being added to the administration and the murderous Venezuela coup is folded into its policy.
Too much of the antiwar community is still stuck in the early 2000s. The western war machine just doesnt generally kill that way anymore, and we need to adjust our perspectives if we want to address the actual murderousness as it is actually showing up. If you keep looking out for obsolete ground invasions, youre going to miss the new form of warmongering completely.
Trump supporters who claim to oppose war missed this completely throughout the entirety of his presidency, confining the concept of war solely to its most blatant iterations in order to feel like their president was a peacemaker instead of a warmonger. One of the few positive developments that could potentially arise from the Biden administration is helping such people to recognize acts of violence like starvation sanctions as war, since they will be opposing Biden and that is how this new administration will be manifesting much of its murderousness.
The political/media class likes to keep everyone focused on the differences between each president and his immediate predecessor, but we can learn a whole lot more by looking at their similarities. Bidens warmongering is going to look a lot like Trumpsjust directed in some different directions and expressing in slightly different waysdespite all the energy that has been poured into painting them as two wildly different individuals. Once you see beyond the partisan puppet show, you see a single oligarchic empire continuing the same murderous agendas from one sock puppet administration to the next.