Quick report here -- was just about to post an item from 4um at chimpmania.com with the source it cited. Got a warning page: Sorry, but one of your links was denied in your message - "thegatewaypundit". Please, press the "Back" button in your web-browser and use another source that supports your posting. Denied links are websites that are not considered reliable sources on Chimpmania, may contain dangerous coding or other reasons. If you believe there is some mistake, please contact a forum moderator.
Searched the article, found it at tmz.com -- got the same message re TMZ. Now the item looks authentic and I'm sure it is, but Chimpmania's response is interesting. So happens I've often looked at some Gateway Pundit story and said to meself 'It looks legit and the site has a very familiar name. Why am I questioning it?'
Chimpmania gets my vote on this. Despite its outward kickiness and frivolity it's very serious about what what it's doing. It's totally benign toward participants -- polite, encouraging, helpful, systematic -- and what's not to like about this concern for accuracy.
These screamingly funny negro-lambasting sites are vilified online and ppl would love to find an excuse to sic the law on 'em. Oddly, they seem to be created and run by jews. Somebody's putting a hellalotta time into running them. [To compile secret lists of 'extremists' and 'racists' like me? ;-] Of course nonwhites (e.g. jews) are the ultimate 'racists' and 'bigots' on average.
Soooo, Let's take a lesson and be extremely cautious even with hot items from lots of rightist sites. Searching is still so easy and there are different angles to try. Based on the Big 10 I feature here I'd say more outspoken and serious a site is about the hell of 'diversity' with direct links to documentation, the higher it is on the trust scale. (They're like 98-99% or more.)
These sober journalists' sacred mission is denouncing and exposing the ravages wrought by jew supremacy, muh Holocaust, snivel rights, 'equality', 'tolerance', ameriKa's do-gooder wars et al to a world that mostly hates it. Most most of their sourcing is the vainstream media, so what can gliberal whinycats say.
*Well, checking out via whatever search engine(s) the system has appointed to be uncensored on a given day.