Title: Tulsi Gabbard SLAMS Joe Biden To MILLIONS OF VIEWERS!! Finally A Democrat Who Tells The TRUTH! Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBBOJhZ7OT0 Published:Jan 25, 2021 Author:Liberal Hivemind Post Date:2021-01-27 18:34:46 by BTP Holdings Keywords:None Views:1060 Comments:15
Poster Comment:
After the way Tulsi thumped Harris in the debate, she deserves a good listen here.
"But over the years, I formed my own opinions based on my life experience that changed my views – at a personal level in having aloha, love, for all people, and ensuring that every American, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, is treated equally under the law."
Tulsi Gabbard said she has since changed her views and has repeatedly voted in Congress to protect gay rights. She is a member of the House LGBT Equality Caucus, and gay rights group the Human Rights Campaign gave her a score of 100 for her voting record.
I think it's reasonable to assume that Gabbard will say such a thing now:
It's reasonable to assume that those with tunnel vision will put words in her mouth that she never said, simply because they see everything in black and white with no grey shades in between.
In my view she would have made a much better president than Donald Trump, and INFINITELY better than Joe Biden.
Neither Esso nor I claimed that Gabbard said anything about 72 genders. Esso said she will say that, and I said that it's reasonable to assume that she will say that, based not only on what she said as reported in the article that I posted a link to (which I did read), but also on the fact that she is reportedly a member of the House LGBT Equality Caucus, and gay rights group the Human Rights Campaign reportedly gave her a score of 100 for her voting record.
If you don't agree that it's reasonable to assume that Gabbard will say there are 72 genders, fine. Do you know that she won't say that? If you do not know that, then you do not know that Esso is wrong. In any case, you cannot know that I am wrong, because you cannot know better than I what it is that I believe to be reasonable.
Tunnel vision? Unable to see grey shades? Insults don't strengthen your argument.
Esso said she will say that, and I said that it's reasonable to assume that she will say that, based not only on what she said as reported in the article that I posted a link to (which I did read),
Might I predict that Donald Trump will say that he is the 2nd coming of Christ? Who's to prove me wrong?
but also on the fact that she is reportedly a member of the House LGBT Equality Caucus
Ok, you got me on that one. BUT, I still don't think she'd ever say that there are 72 genders.
Plus if you look at her entire bio on Wiki, there's a lot more positive things she's done on things we can support than the things we won't or can't.