Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Was Winston Churchill The Most Successful Double Agent In History by Michael Walsh
Source: [None]
URL Source: ... t-in-history-by-michael-walsh/
Published: Jan 31, 2021
Author: Mark Elsis
Post Date: 2021-01-31 04:47:02 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 63
Comments: 2

Britain in 1939 was the hub of a world empire with powerful commonwealth allies. It is strange that, throughout World War II (1939-1945) which Winston Spencer Churchill (1874-1965) enthusiastically pursued, never consulted or collaborated with his Australian, South African, New Zealand, Indian or Canadian counterparts?

These powerful British Empire component nations made up an integral part of the London-based British Empire. Unlike the neutral United States, these nations had in 1939 declared war on National Socialist Germany. Yet, Winston Churchill never involved these powerful British allies in consultation as to the direction of the war with Germany.

Their geographical diversity; access to raw materials, manufacturing potential, trade connections and distance from Europe suggests that strategically and economically they would make far better partners than did the United States.

There would be little need for Lend-Lease agreements which benefited only the tyrannical Soviet Union. The open cheque gifted to Stalin by Roosevelt and Churchill, with interest added would eventually be settled by British people through taxation.

Why did Winston Churchill, given the powers of a dictator, go personally cap in hand to a country that was not at war with Germany? Was the British Empire by then an irrelevancy to him?

Was it Churchill’s intention to broker a deal that would dismantle and transfer the British Empire to American power? If so he could hardly have been more successful. Winston Churchill was half-American and was a dual citizen and passport holder of the United States.

Was Winston’s Churchill’s secret agenda to destroy Germany as a trade rival and simultaneously remove a threat to the Soviet regime?

Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin were far more than national leaders; the two were unelected and were the closest of friends; almost soul mates. The two leaders had much in common.

Winston Churchill was well aware that the overthrow of Imperial Russia (1917-1922) was funded by Wall Street banks and sponsored by Washington DC. Churchill could clearly foresee the triumph of the Comintern (now Globalism) and as clearly he had decided that if you can’t fight them (the United States and USSR) then it was best to join them.

If as the evidence now suggests, Winston Churchill by his intrigues made possible the onslaught of the USSR and 22 European nations being fed into the Soviet maws at the Yalta Conference, February 1945. In fact, such was the assistance given by Churchill (and Roosevelt) that Red Square could be renamed Roosevelt Churchill Square in their honour.

As Prime Minister, Churchill was also hand in glove with KGB double agents such as Kim Philby (1912-1988) who was an integral part of the Soviet Spy Ring? One of Winston Churchill’s first acts on becoming Britain’s unelected prime minister in May 1940 was to halt all intelligence surveillance on Soviet suspects. This led immediately to the wholesale infiltration of MI5 and MI6 by the KGB throughout the 1940s. Britain’s head of MI6/SIS in the Iberian Peninsula was the same notorious British-Soviet spy, Kim Philby?

Unarguably and with hindsight, everything that Winston Churchill undertook worked to the disadvantage of Britain and its empire. Every strategy he adopted benefited the Soviet Union and all-powerful Washington Deep State. In Israel, a forest was named in Winston Churchill’s honour.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck it is a duck. The money is on Winston Churchill having succeeded beyond his wildest dreams in transferring Britain’s empire to its greatest rival, the United States. Between 64 and 71 years of age that one man destroyed an empire so great the sun never set on it. Simultaneously, Winston Churchill enabled both the United States and the Soviet Union to achieve superpower status.

Winston Churchill was the only man with the resourcefulness, the ruthless, the means and the sponsorship to bring down the British Empire. Was it just an unfortunate coincidence that in helping to defeat the Reich he simultaneously presided over the dismantling of the British Empire and the transfer of its assets to the United States of America?

This may go some way to explain why Churchill expressed no regrets over the carnage of World War II. Why would he regret having so successfully accomplished all he had set out to achieve? Yet, such was the appalling misery heaped upon mankind it would have been perfectly natural for any government leader, regardless of political persuasion, to express remorse. In fact, some did including Prime Minister Aneurin Bevan (1897-1960) and many experts then and since.

Without exception, national leaders like Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and their neutral allies like General Franco, Republic of Ireland, the nations of Latin America and scores similar lamented the needless losses of World War II. All had constantly appealed for peace terms that were rejected by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin.

Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt never bemoaned the loss of 50 million lives. If Winston Churchill was a super-agent, the most successful in world history, it would explain his self-satisfaction, a smugness that followed him to his grave.

Was the British people’s adulation heaped upon his funeral cortege the greatest irony of all time? Was a country’s national mourning for the one man who single-handed destroyed their 300-year old empire.

By 1945, Winston Churchill had bankrupted Britain; the United Kingdom was drowning under its war debt. Then, Harald Macmillan (1894-1986), another half-American and close friend of Winston Churchill introduced the ‘Winds of Change’. From that notorious speech made to the parliament of South Africa in 1960, British and other European nations, dependent upon Wall Street sponsorship transferred Europe’s African colonies to the American-based globalist banks.

From one disaster to another, these empire-killing edicts were accompanied by the final nails in the British Empire’s coffin when millions of coloured colonisers were sponsored by ongoing British regimes to settle in Britain. Today, everything about Britain is alien to the nation it was before the outbreak of World War II. Was it by accident or by design? You decide.

Churchill and Macmillan, aided by the globalist United States put into motion a sequence of governmental decrees that would result in Britain’s final destruction through a policy of non-European immigration and assimilation.

If Churchill was a super-agent it is likely you will hear as you pass St Martin’s Church, just outside Blenheim Palace, a chortling from history’s most successful double agent. ~ Michael Walsh Historian.

Poster Comment:

FDR, Stain and Churchill were of Jewish descent.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse (#0)

Who gives a rats ass, these bastards have been dead for how long????

Darkwing  posted on  2021-01-31   9:37:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Horse (#0)


Cynicom  posted on  2021-01-31   9:52:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest