Jewish Control, Zionist Subversion and the Contradictions of Anti- Semitism
Parasites grin: Bibi Netanyahu greets Jonathan Pollard, the Jewish spy who did huge harm to his own nation of America on behalf of Israel
Like all decent people, I stand unshakably with the powerless Jewish community against the vile scourge of anti-Semitism and anti-Jewish racism. And in order to better defend cowering Jews against their hugely powerful enemies, Ive often asked myself: What is the most anti-Semitic nation on earth? Is it Iran, perhaps? Well, no. Not by a long way. The citizens of Iran have never loudly celebrated a disgusting anti-Semitic stereotype, nor has the prime minister of Iran been photographed with a smug grin as he too celebrates the stereotype.
But the citizens of Israel have done exactly that and the prime minister of Israel has been photographed exactly like that. According to the highly respected International Holocaust Remembrance Association (IHRA), the following is a prime example of anti-Semitism: Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. Towards the end of 2020, Donald Trump once again followed Jewish orders and ushered Jonathan Pollard, the most damaging spy in United States history, towards a dream realised after 35 very difficult years. Pollard is Jewish and spied enthusiastically for Israel, doing huge harm to America as he handed priceless secrets to his Mossad handlers. But Pollard was born in America, therefore his own nation must be America and, as the IHRA have told us, it is clearly anti-Semitic to say he could be more loyal to Israel than to America.
Born in America, loyal only to Israel
But what did the citizens and prime minister of Israel do? They brazenly celebrated that vile anti-Semitic stereotype about Jewish disloyalty and treachery. The Irish Savant reported Pollards arrival in Israel like this:
It was a welcome befitting a war hero. And in a sense Jonathan Pollard was indeed such a hero, and a patriot. At considerable personal risk he stole secrets which in turn were traded by his country to great effect. He was greeted in Tel Aviv by none other than Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As he disembarked, he kissed the ground and recited the traditional sheheheyanu blessing of thanksgiving. A beaming Beni gushed: Blessed are you, lord our God, king of the universe, who has granted us life, sustained us, and enabled us to reach this occasion. I was thrilled to welcome Jonathan and Esther Pollard today upon their arrival in Israel and to give Jonathan an Israeli identity card. Now they are home. Welcome home, now you are a citizen of the State of Israel. Pollard responded: We are ecstatic to be home at last after 35 years and we thank the people and the Prime Minister of Israel for bringing us home. (A Heros Homecoming, The Irish Savant, 5th January 2021)
But how can Israel be Pollards home if his own nation is his birthplace of America? The only logical conclusion to reach is this: Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the worlds worst anti-Semites, Israel is the most anti-Semitic nation on earth, and Jonathan Pollard is a self- hating Jew. At least, thats the only logical conclusion if you trust the IHRA to be honest about anti-Semitism and Jewish behaviour.
No concern for truth or objective reality
But you cant trust the IHRA, of course. Like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in America, the Community Security Trust (CST) in Britain and the Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et lAntisémitisme (LICRA) in France, the IHRA is a typical Jewish organization in that it believes in the audacity of mendacity. Like the ADL et al, the IHRA has no concern for truth or objective reality. Instead, it relentlessly and ruthlessly pursues Whats Best for Jews. Free speech and open debate are not best for Jews, therefore the IHRA wants to silence all critics of Jewish power and subversion. Thats why it says ludicrous things, then demands that they be taken seriously. Youve heard of the Emperors New Clothes. Now meet the Empires New Definition:
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. Definition of anti-Semitism by the International Holocaust Remembrance Association (IHRA)
The Empire is Zionism and that ludicrously vague definition is plainly designed to end free speech about Jewish political power and the way Jews control Western politics for the benefit of Israel. What cant be discussed cant be challenged or criticized, which is just the way organized Jewry want things to be. Unlike the Emperors New Clothes, which were exposed as a sham when a little boy literally spoke truth to power, the Empires New Definition is being taken seriously by supine politicians and bureaucrats all over the world. In Britain, the free-speech-hating Campaign Against Antisemitism has boasted of how widely the dud definition has been accepted:
In 2005, the EU Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), now the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), adopted a working definition of antisemitism which has become the standard definition used around the world, including by the European Parliament, the UK College of Policing, the US Department of State, the US Senate, and the 31 countries comprising the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. In 2016, the powerful House of Commons Home Affairs Committee joined Campaign Against Antisemitisms longstanding call for the British government and its agencies, as well as all political parties, to formally adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism, following which the British government formally adopted the definition. (What is Antisemitism?, The Campaign Against Antisemitism)
In other words, thousands of legal and legislative experts have read the IHRA definition and responded not with incredulous laughter, but with cries of We hear and obey! For all sane and objective people, however, the definition exposes the organized Jewish community as implacable enemies not merely of free speech but of the very concepts of truth and objective reality. Even some members of the Jewish elite object to the IHRA definition. Professor David Feldman, director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Antisemitism at the University of London, has said that the government should not impose [this] faulty definition of antisemitism on universities. The prominent Jewish lawyers Sir Stephen Sedley and Sir Geoffrey Bindman were two of the signatories to a letter in the Guardian stating that the legally entrenched right to free expression is being undermined by an internally incoherent non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism.
A bewildering variety of world-views
These dissenting Jews are certainly not friendly to Whites or Western civilization Stephen Sedley, for example, wants open borders for Muslims and is a son of a lifelong Communist but one has to give them credit for being honest about the definition and resisting very strong pressure from other Jews. The Jewish Chronicle reports that Professor Feldman has been rebuked by his colleagues at the Pears Institute. Sedley and Bindman will face similar hostility for being outliers, as the Jewish commentator Harry Goldstein describes all Jews who object to the ludicrous IHRA definition. Goldstein goes on to expose the contradictions of anti-Semitism like this:
Antisemitism differs from other racisms in that it understands itself as punching up. It constructs its target group as a sinister elite, which it sees itself as courageously defying. This is a deeply conspiratorial world-view. Antisemitism is not just racist stereotypes about Jews having long noses, an obsession with money or being generally slippery characters. These stereotypes are rather like the porcupines needles. Theyre obvious, they hurt, but they are not the essence of the animal.
A key point about this faux anti-elitism is that it can attach itself to a bewildering variety of world-views. For each, it constructs Jews as whatever the adherents of the world-view despise. In Medieval times it was their religion, for 19th century racists it was their supposed race. For right-wingers Jews are communists, for the left (including Marx) they are the essence of the money power. For nationalists (and Stalin) they are rootless cosmopolitans, for liberals narrow nationalists. In 19th-century Britain they were swarthy Levantines and Orientals, while for the Nazis they were Semites, the sworn enemies of the white Aryan race. And now these swarthy Levantines have apparently been transformed into white colonialists. (Antisemitism at UCL the Working Party Report, Harry Goldstein, 22nd December 2020)
There you have it: according to Harry Goldstein, anti-Semites deal in ludicrous contradictions. Its the same as when some pseudo-scientists make the ludicrous and irrational claim that flies can also exist in a wingless, worm-like form known as a larva or maggot. Have you ever heard anything more ridiculous? But it gets worse: the same pseudo- scientists make the same contradictory claim about many other insects that are famed for their aerial abilities, from butterflies, dragonflies and damselflies to mayflies, fireflies and hoverflies. According to these idiots, all such blatantly winged insects can also exist as wingless larvae. And some of the larvae live underwater.
Click for Full Text!