Eager to obtain vindication for the pre-election falsehood they spread about the Hunter Biden story, journalists falsely claim that the CIA blamed Russia for it.
Journalists with the largest and most influential media outlets disseminated an outright and quite significant lie on Tuesday to hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions, on Twitter. While some of them were shamed into acknowledging the falsity of their claim, many refused to, causing it to continue to spread up until this very moment. It is well worth examining how they function because this is how they deceive the public again and again, and it is why public trust in their pronouncements has justifiably plummeted.
The lie they told involved claims of Russian involvement in the procurement of Hunter Bidens laptop. In the weeks leading up to the 2020 election, The New York Post obtained that laptop and published a series of articles about the Biden familys business dealings in Ukraine, China and elsewhere. In response, Twitter banned the posting of any links to that reporting and locked The Post out of its Twitter account for close to two weeks, while Facebook, through a long-time Democratic operative, announced that it would algorithmically suppress the reporting.
Type your email
Subscribe The excuse used by those social media companies for censoring this reporting was the same invoked by media outlets to justify their refusal to report the contents of these documents: namely, that the materials were Russian disinformation. That claim of Russian disinformation was concocted by a group of several dozen former CIA officials and other operatives of the intelligence community devoted to defeating Trump. Immediately after The Post published its first story about Hunter Bidens business dealings in Ukraine that traded on his influence with his father, these career spies and propagandists, led by Obama CIA Director and serial liar John Brennan, published a letter asserting that the appearance of these Biden documents has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.
News outlets uncritically hyped this claim as fact even though these security state operatives themselves admitted: We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails
are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement -- just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case. Even though this claim came from trained liars who, with uncharacteristic candor, acknowledged that they did not have evidence for their claim, media outlets uncritically ratified this assertion.
This was a topic I discussed extensively in October when I announced my resignation from The Intercept after senior editors for the first time in seven years violated the contractual prohibition on editorial interference in my journalism by demanding I significantly alter my reporting about these documents by removing the sections that reflected negatively on Biden. What I found particularly galling about their pretense that they have such high-level and rigorous editorial standards standards they claimed, for the first time ever, that my article failed to meet was that a mere week prior to their censorship of my article, they published an article by a different journalist which, at a media outlet we created with the explicit purpose of treating government claims with skepticism, instead treated the CIAs claims of Russian disinformation as fact. Even worse, when they quoted the CIAs letter, they omitted the part where even those intelligence agents acknowledged that they had no evidence for their assertion. From The Intercept on October 21:
Their latest falsehood once again involves Biden, Ukraine, and a laptop mysteriously discovered in a computer repair shop and passed to the New York Post, thanks to Trump crony Rudy Giuliani
.. The U.S. intelligence community had previously warned the White House that Giuliani has been the target of a Russian intelligence operation to disseminate disinformation about Biden, and the FBI has been investigating whether the strange story about the Biden laptop is part of a Russian disinformation campaign. This week, a group of former intelligence officials issued a letter saying that the Giuliani laptop story has the classic trademarks of Russian disinformation.
Oh my, marvel at those extremely rigorous editorial standards: regurgitating serious accusations from ex-CIA operatives without bothering to note that they were unaccompanied by evidence and that even those agents admitted they had none. But, as they usually do these days, The Intercept had plenty of company in the corporate media.
That those materials were Russian disinformation became so reflexively accepted by the U.S. media that it became the principal excuse to ignore and even censor the reporting, and it also helpfully handed the Biden campaign an easy excuse to avoid answering any questions about what the documents revealed. I think we need to be very, very clear that what he's doing here is amplifying Russian misinformation," said Biden Deputy Campaign Manager Kate Bedingfield when asked about the prospect that Trump would raise the Biden emails at the debate. From the CIAs lips to the mouths of corporate journalists into the hands of the Biden campaign.
As the U.S. media disseminated this disinformation tale, nobody including the Bidens has ever claimed let alone demonstrated that a single document was anything other than genuine something that would be exceedingly easy to do if the documents were fraudulent. "The Biden team has rejected some of the claims made in the NY Post articles, but has not disputed the authenticity of the [laptop] files upon which they were based, acknowledged The New York Times. Ample evidence corroborates that the documents are genuine.
As for the claims of Russian involvement in the laptop story, there was never any evidence for it: none. The CIA operatives who invented that storyline acknowledged that. The week that tale emerged, The New York Times reported that no concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian disinformation and the paper said even the FBI has acknowledged that it had not found any Russian disinformation on the laptop. The Washington Post published an op-ed by Russia fanatic Thomas Rid who candidly pronounced: We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign intelligence operation even if they probably aren't." And the only time the U.S. Government has ever spoken on this question was when the Director of National Intelligence stated: Hunter Biden's laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign."
These documents raised important questions about the presidential frontrunners knowledge of or participation in his family members attempt to profit off of their association with him, questions implicating his integrity, ethics and honesty. Yet those documents were suppressed by a gigantic fraud, perpetrated by the CIA and their media allies, which claimed that the documents were forged and that they came from Russia.
That is the critical context for the lie spread yesterday by numerous mainstream journalists. On Tuesday morning, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified a short 12-page report entitled Foreign Threats to the U.S. 2020 Elections.
It reviewed the actions of numerous countries with regard to the 2020 election. The intelligence community claimed without presenting any evidence whatsoever that Russian President Putin authorized
influence operations aimed at denigrating President Bidens candidacy and the Democratic Party, supporting former President Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral process, and exacerbating sociopolitical divisions in the U.S. The New York Times largely credulous article about this report contained this admission, one you would think (or, rather, hope) would matter to journalists: The declassified report did not explain how the intelligence community had reached its conclusions about Russian operations during the 2020 election.
Despite that glaring omission, media outlets predictably treated the evidence-free assertions from the security state as fact. Vladimir Putin did it again, trumpeted Mother Jones David Corn without an iota of skepticism. CNNs Marshall Cohen actually said this:
Click for Full Text!