Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Derek Chauvin, Human Sacrifice
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.takimag.com/article/derek-chauvin-human-sacrifice/
Published: Apr 2, 2021
Author: Ann Coulter
Post Date: 2021-04-02 08:54:33 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 2582
Comments: 65

In modern America, we periodically offer up white men as human sacrifices to the PC gods. Among our benefactions: Jake Gardner, Kyle Rittenhouse, Darren Wilson, the Duke lacrosse players, University of Virginia fraternity members, Stacey Koon and Mark Fuhrman.

The rest of us just keep our heads down and pray we won’t be next.

At least the Duke and UVA human offerings were sufficiently upper-crust to have a few journalists and lawyers defending them. But policemen, bar owners, military veterans and a Midwest teenager? Definitely not our crowd, darling.

Currently, Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is on trial for killing George Floyd by kneeling on his neck, as it appeared in cellphone videos. You may remember something about this: It’s why America had to burn in 2020.

“In the darkest days of Jim Crow, the entire country never ganged up on a single individual like this.” But the chief medical examiner’s report establishes that, however else Floyd died, it wasn’t from Chauvin’s knee. Oopsie! I guess it wasn’t absolutely essential that our country go through eight months of looting, riots and mostly peaceful arsons.

In lieu of citing some B.S. media “fact check,” I shall quote directly from the autopsy report by the Hennepin County Chief Medical Examiner, Andrew Baker:

“No life-threatening injuries identified —

“A. No facial, oral mucosal, or conjunctival petechiae

“B. No injuries of anterior muscles of neck or laryngeal structures

“C. No scalp soft tissue, skull, or brain injuries

“D. No chest wall soft tissue injuries, rib fractures (other than a single rib fracture from CPR), vertebral column injuries, or visceral injuries

“E. Incision and subcutaneous dissection of posterior and lateral neck, shoulders, back, flanks, and buttocks negative for occult trauma”

In short: No bloodshot eyes and no trauma to any part of Floyd’s neck.

And yet, day after day, prosecutors, witnesses and the media tell us that Chauvin “squeezed the life out of” Floyd. The medical evidence establishes that whatever else caused his death, it was NOT asphyxiation.

That’s the entire case against Officer Chauvin! But the howling mob isn’t giving up its holy religious observance because of one dork in a lab coat. The sun might not rise! The city of Minneapolis could be wiped out! Wait — that might actually happen.

The medical examiner also found that Floyd had enough fentanyl in his system — I don’t want to say “to kill a horse,” because that would be a cliche. But it would be enough to bump off an entire team of Budweiser Clydesdales. In technical medical jargon:

“A. Blood drug and novel psychoactive substances screens:

“1. Fentanyl 11 ng/mL”

That’s just the first few words of the “Toxicology” section. Also listed are norfentanyl, 4-ANPP, methamphetamine, cannabinoids, amphetamines, morphine and so on.

But the 11 nanograms per milliliter of fentanyl is rather important, inasmuch as the chief medical examiner called this “a fatal level of fentanyl under normal circumstances,” saying, “deaths have been certified with levels of 3.”

Three. But George Floyd went up to 11.

Naturally, Baker was quick to add, “I am not saying this killed him.” Please don’t throw me to the woke gods! Leave me to my test tubes! (And you thought lawyers were craven.)

I have a feeling we’re about to see another example of the left not accepting science.

In addition to liberals refusing to accept the science of:

— DNA (the O.J. trial)

— AIDS (we’re still waiting for that big heterosexual outbreak!)

— Cancer clusters and breast implants (billions of dollars wasted and companies destroyed because of the left’s adherence to junk science)

— I.Q. (just watch the reaction to my mentioning this hate-science) …

… we can now add “pharmacology”!

You mean to say that just by sticking a syringe in someone’s arm you can tell if he’s been taking drugs? That’s a lot of mumbo-jumbo, just like the moon landing.

This trial is a total sham, but the entire power of the state, the media, the left-wing shock troops and the country’s finest legal talent is being deployed against Derek Chauvin.

In addition to Minnesota’s top prosecutor, the state has hired Neal Katyal, former solicitor general of the United States — an unheard-of maneuver in a case that doesn’t involve some highly technical specialty, like antitrust. A slew of lawyers are working pro bono for the prosecutor — also unheard of. The state has unlimited resources to pursue Chauvin.

Against this, Chauvin has one lone defense attorney, Eric “Atticus Finch” Nelson. The Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association’s legal defense fund will put up to $1 million toward his defense, and Nelson can talk to the other rotating attorneys whom the fund employs. But unless they’re working pro bono, too, $1 million runs out pretty fast.

The legal mismatch in the O.J. Simpson case wasn’t this one-sided.

In the middle of jury selection, the city of Minneapolis announced an eye-popping civil settlement of $27 million with the family of George Floyd. Liberals are still denouncing Richard Nixon for a 1970 speech in which he inadvertently described defendant Charles Manson as someone who was “guilty, directly or indirectly, of eight murders” — leading to demands for a mistrial.

What does a $27 million settlement with the family of the alleged victim say?

Black residents of Minneapolis are threatening to burn the place down if Chauvin isn’t convicted — and the only reason anyone thinks a jury could possibly return a guilty verdict is that they believe them.

In the darkest days of Jim Crow, the entire country never ganged up on a single individual like this.

Please, gods of wokeness, we ask that his human sacrifice be acceptable!

Throw another virgin into the volcano.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#2. To: Ada (#0)

Okay this is a bullshit article because Derek Chauvin has 12 lawyers plus the one in the courtroom working on his case. That is an actual fact as that team of lawyers is being paid for by the police union.

The trial took a turn when Floyd's buddy plead the 5th. When the lying girlfriend got on the stand for the theatrical portion of the trial, her testimony alone made George look like a drug addled criminal as he had a pain management problem. Likely brought on by being estranged from his wife and kids, which he managed by having affairs and drug use.

It is why Derek Chauvin is not going to jail.

The author of this idiocy does not see the big picture here. Minnesota is ground zero for what will be the launching point of a potential Civil War based entirely on a lie. Keith Ellison set this in motion a year ago and the terrorist has engineered more violence for this summer. I promise you that if Derek Chauvin is acquitted, which is the desired outcome for the powers that be, there will be blood in the streets over it. The powers that be want it so they can clamp down on society.

They want a civil war so that their Chinese masters can swoop in and bring peace.

The author of this piece has no idea what the plan is and thinks that the bar for justice is so low that anything goes. Sorry pal, the one thing about the law when liberals run it, it works exactly the way they want it to. The bar for proving murder is very high. Mohammed Noor almost got away with it when he deliberately shot a white woman. Chauvin is going to get off because they cannot prove he intentionally killed George Floyd.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2021-04-02   9:53:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#2)

It is why Derek Chauvin is not going to jail.

Jury nullification can work both ways. A jury can convict against the evidence if it wants to.

Ada  posted on  2021-04-02   10:41:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#4)

I really really hope he's not punished. News readers are discussing how jurors are afraid to serve -- there might be an acquittal and then reprisals on them, which is to say that 'diversity' totally destroys justice among its other accomplishments.

DS has some awefull observations about police -- 'I Don’t Care Who Wins the Chauvin Trial and I’m Not Covering It'

dailystormer.su/i-dont-ca...l-and-im- not-covering-it/

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2021-04-02   11:51:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: NeoconsNailed (#5) (Edited)

News readers are discussing how jurors are afraid to serve

The jurors are sensible. And those wanting to serve are suspect, i.e., they might be doing it in order to write a book about the experience.

What's missing so far in the prosecution case is motive and I doubt they will bring it up. Might have been one, though.

Ada  posted on  2021-04-02   12:45:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Ada (#11) (Edited)

How do you know these jurors are sensible? Not that I've been following it closely.

Motive for what? A store clerk alleged Floyd had passed a counterfeit $20 bill. Wasn't he menacing the police like all BLMated fake martyrs? HAH, I see GF's mother's name was Larcenia! Variation on the Afro tradition of naming children from words on the birth certificate? (Female = "fumolly". Syphilis = SuFYlis.)

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2021-04-02   13:32:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)

How do you know these jurors are sensible? Not that I've been following it closely.

The jurors that didn't want to serve are the sensible ones. (Courts are suspicious of those that are eager--they might not be impartial.)

Both Chauvin and Floyd worked security for a sleazy nightclub suspected of criminal activity, specifically counterfeiting and money laundering. Chauvin for 17 years and must have known what was going on and might have been protecting the owners from Minneapolis police raids. Floyd only for a short time and it has been suggested he was planted there by the Fibbees in order to collect evidence. If Chauvin suspected Floyd to be a snitch, that would have been motive. (My Somali who has contacts in the Minneapolis Somali community reports that Chauvin and all the others in his group had reputation for being bad guys.)

No evidence has been entered as to where Floyd got the counterfeit $20, but his former employer is a good guess.

Ada  posted on  2021-04-02   15:00:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Ada, ghostdogtxn, 4um (#19)

The jurors that didn't want to serve are the sensible ones. (Courts are suspicious of those that are eager--they might not be impartial.)

A good way to get out of jury without going to jail during what I think is called voir dire is to tell the prosecutor and defense lawyer, "No, I won't blindly make a determination of guilt based on instructions and the written law. Jurors are here to interpret the law and make a fair decision based on the circumstances. Computers could blindly follow the law. Jurors are there to do the right thing. (Or something very close to that.)

Prosecuting Atty - "Very unsuitable, declined."

Defense Atty - "Yeah, yeah, yeah!" (While nodding his head up and down so fast I thought it might fly off.)

FWIW, the deal was some kind of workplace dispute between what looked like two white homeless men that should've never seen a courtroom. Probably ten+ years ago.

I have no idea what the outcome of "The Trial of the Century" was. It was so stupid on its face that I couldn't even believe it.

Regardless, I got my 25 bux or whatever it was. I only lost about $475 for my time being pulled away from my job, when I was still able to work.

Geeze, get me on a jury now. "Oh yes, councilor, I'm a woke automaton!"

The country isn't going to make it this time. Maybe Texas will.

Esso  posted on  2021-04-02   20:33:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Esso (#21)

A good way to get out of jury without going to jail during what I think is called voir dire is to tell the prosecutor and defense lawyer, "No, I won't blindly make a determination of guilt based on instructions and the written law. Jurors are here to interpret the law and make a fair decision based on the circumstances. Computers could blindly follow the law. Jurors are there to do the right thing.

Another way to get out of it is to tell the court that you would make a great jurist because you can tell if someone's guilty just by looking at them.

Pinguinite  posted on  2021-04-03   2:17:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#29. To: Pinguinite (#27)

Another way to get out of it is to tell the court that you would make a great jurist because you can tell if someone's guilty just by looking at them.

I could see they were both guilty because of stupidity (lawyers inc.)

Before my brain got mashed up a few years ago I used to be somebody.

Esso  posted on  2021-04-03 02:32:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest