Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: Thanks, Jurors! You’re Safe Now. We Aren’t
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.takimag.com/article/tha ... urors-youre-safe-now-we-arent/
Published: Apr 23, 2021
Author: Ann Coulter
Post Date: 2021-04-23 14:41:59 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 346
Comments: 16

To watch the hours of celebratory fist-pumping from government officials and black activists after the guilty verdicts against police officer Derek Chauvin this week, you’d think Minnesota had just won the NCAA tournament.

One man is dead and another will be spending up to 40 years in prison. How about Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison show a little dignity, with something like: “We had the trial; we’ve got a verdict; I’m not taking any questions”?

Nope! We got a one-hour spirit rally for the championship team. The key was teamwork. Our guys practiced every night — staying even after the gym had closed! We couldn’t have done it without the fans.

There wasn’t this much triumphalism when Ted Bundy was convicted! He murdered 30 women, escaped from jail twice, and killed again before finally being brought to trial. We didn’t have hours of gloating after they got the Green River Killer, and it took 20 years to catch him.

Maybe we’ve gotten less decorous in the past few decades. But how about celebrating the conviction of a gangbanger who killed an 8-year-old girl in a drive-by? Would the media be as giddy about that?

Not likely. Wild celebrations are in order only for the railroading of a cop.

The prosecutors must feel great! All it took was threatening the jurors with riots and personal destruction to get the verdict they wanted. Real Ciceros, these guys.

Chauvin was forced to flee his home last year, which naturally had been vandalized, requiring constant police presence. Barricades have recently been erected around the home of officer Kim Potter, who accidentally shot escaping violent gun offender Daunte Wright last week.

The day before Chauvin’s case went to the jury, a defense witness — a witness! — had his former home in California vandalized with pigs’ blood and a pig’s head.

So I’m sure the jurors reached their verdict purely based on the evidence, after a careful weighing of both sides in the Anglo-Saxon tradition.

“There wasn’t this much triumphalism when Ted Bundy was convicted!” We’re told that this is only the beginning, big changes are in the air. Does that mean every case against a cop will come with threats of mob violence?

Here’s one big change in policing that will come out of the Chauvin trial: No longer will police use the least amount of force on vulnerable individuals, like George Floyd. From here on out, the safety of the perp will take a back seat to avoiding unflattering cellphone videos.

A key point brought out at trial was this: As soon as Chauvin arrived on the scene, he would have been within his rights to use a Taser or stun gun on Floyd. The prosecution’s use-of-force experts agreed!

Chauvin employed a less aggressive restraint that looked worse to bystanders. Big mistake.

By now, surely, all law enforcement officers realize that their one overriding concern must always be the optics, not the reality. Unlike other public servants, police have to do their jobs while under the watchful eye of cellphone cameras. What matters is how things appear to idiot onlookers.

Heart disease is rampant in the African American community. Combine that with drug use and behavioral problems — and there are a lot more George Floyds out there waiting to happen.

According to the medical examiner, it was the stress of being restrained — combined with Floyd’s heart condition and massive amount of fentanyl in his system — that killed him. If lying on the ground was too much stress on Floyd’s heart, how about 50,000 volts of electricity?

Again, according to the state’s use-of-force experts, that would have been A-OK.

Got a resisting arrestee? Zap him with the stun gun and heave him in the back of the police van. Whatever happens after that, at least you won’t have a chubby EMT screaming at you and taking videos.

True, Floyd stood a better chance of going on living by NOT being zapped with a stun gun. On the other hand, Chauvin stood a better chance of staying out of prison if he’d just gotten Floyd in the police van, pronto.

Nice work, Minnesota!

The other big change coming down the pike is that we are headed back to the 1960s in terms of crime. Already, 2020 marked the largest year-to- year increase in murders in the history of the country. In Minneapolis alone, the murder rate doubled. Get ready for a lot more violent crime, emboldened criminals and less aggressive police.

To the unwitting citizens of Minnesota who will soon have their lives snuffed out, just remember: The jurors were worried about their own personal security. It was your life or theirs, and they decided the better part of valor was to sacrifice yours.

Their motto: I regret that I have only dozens of other people’s lives to give for my virtue.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#2. To: Ada (#0)

Permit to carry holders are going to find themselves sued or jailed for shooting black assailants now. Guaranteed. Rapists, carjackers, victims... all because the lawyers and the mob want to turn criminals into cults of personality.

So I guess if you have to shoot a black person, shoot to wound so you can get sued into oblivion for their pain and suffering in perpetuity.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2021-04-23   20:52:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#2)

Permit to carry holders are going to find themselves sued or jailed for shooting black assailants now. Guaranteed.

Right. I've had a lot of folks calling me wanting to know about guns. My advice, now, is don't own a gun unless you want to go to prison, especially if you're white. My best advice was to tell folks not to get themselves into that situation, but to know how to take a firearm away.

So I guess if you have to shoot a black person, shoot to wound so you can get sued into oblivion for their pain and suffering in perpetuity.

I guess my best advice is extreme avoidance. I got away with dropping the hammer on someone 15 years ago. It cost me about 40k worth of guns, 250k from my homeowners insurance, plus lawyer bills.

I should've gotten the hell out of this country when I had the chance.

Don't you do anything as stupid as "trying to wound." If you're stupid enough to have yourself in a situation that you have to shoot, shoot to kill.

I'm just sayin'.

Esso  posted on  2021-04-23   21:29:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Esso (#3)

I teach permit to carry and also have insurance. I teach a good course and know the law. The problem is that the law now no longer means anything.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2021-04-24   0:38:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

        There are no replies to Comment # 12.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest