[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

KAMALA’S AMERICA: Violent Squatters Take Over Massive Mansion in Wealthy Los Angeles Neighborhood

Walk/Don't-Walk - In Which States Do Citizens Stroll The Most?

U.S. Poverty Myth EXPOSED! New Census Report Is Shocking Capitol Hill

August layoffs soared to 15-year high, marking a 193% increase from July.

NYPD Faces Uncertain Future Amid New York's Growing Political Crisis

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll
Source: WorldNetDaily.com
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49945
Published: Apr 27, 2006
Author: WND
Post Date: 2006-04-27 20:02:19 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 82
Comments: 11

ELECTION 2008 Poll: 3rd party scores with border backlash Presidential candidate focused on fence, enforcement would tie Dems, beat GOP Posted: April 27, 2006 2:31 p.m. Eastern

© 2006 http://WorldNetDaily.com

A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll.

The Rasmussen Reports national survey asked respondents how they would vote if "a third party candidate ran in 2008 and promised to build a barrier along the Mexican border and make enforcement of immigration law his top priority."

In that scenario, Democrats, with 31 percent, would be in a virtual tie with the third-party candidate, with 30 percent of the vote. The Republican candidate would be favored by only 21 percent.

Rasmussen comments that the result "probably reflects unhappiness with both parties on the immigration issue rather than a true opportunity for a third party."

Historically, the pollster points out, issues that drive third-party candidates are co-opted by one of the major parties as they prove popular.

Rasmussen surveys have indicated most Americans favor a barrier along the border and enforcement of existing laws prior to other reforms.

Without the third-party candidate, according to the new poll, Democrats hold a 12-point advantage over Republicans on a generic 2008 presidential ballot, 44 percent to 32 percent.

Rasmussen said these figures likely are a reflection of unhappiness with the Bush administration rather than a commentary on prospective candidates from either party.

The latest poll found that with the immigration-issue candidate as an option, 36 percent of voters who identified as conservatives chose the Republican candidate while 35 percent picked the third-party option.

Among political moderates, 34 percent chose the Democrat while 32 percent preferred the third-party candidate.

In contrast to issues such as Iraq and the economy, Rasmussen sees immigration as unsettling for the status quo "because it cuts across the typical partisan and ideological lines in ways that could reshape the nation's political equilibrium."

By emphasizing enforcement of the law, Democrats have leaped ahead of Republicans in the latest poll asking Americans which party they trust more on the issue of illegal immigration.

As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, a Rasmussen survey found more Americans trust Democrats on the immigration issue than Republicans, a recent reversal that has come as Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean declares enforcement of the border his party's top priority.

An earlier survey found that, in a hypothetical race for Congress, a plurality of Americans would vote for the candidate who favors more enforcement on the immigration issue.

Another earlier survey found two-thirds of Americans believe it doesn't make sense to debate new immigration laws until we can first control our borders and enforce existing laws.

That same survey found 40 percent of Americans favor "forcibly" requiring all 11 million illegal immigrants to leave the United States.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: Mind_Virus (#0)

Third party candidate! HOO HOO HA HA HO HO HO! Look folks, a third-party candidate could get 99.99995% of the popular vote, and would still lose to the selected RepubliCrat candidate, alright? Third parties! What a laugh. Ya gets to pick from RepubliCrat shill "A" or RepubliCrat shill "B", and that's your choice, got it? Third party. HO HO HO HO HO! Seriously, what do you people think, that we live in a democracy or something? We live in a corporate dictatorship. Deal with it.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-04-27   20:06:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Elliott Jackalope (#1)

Ross Perot could have gone somewhere in his Third Party bid but he chose to fritter away his momentum. A Third Party candidate with Ross's money could win on 2 issues: 1) Immigration 2) 9-11 Truth movement. But then these "lone assassins" really seem to hate honest men who see the light. I am not convinced that we will have elections in 2008 and that we will remain a sovereign nation until whoever wins will finish his or her first term.

Horse  posted on  2006-04-27   23:19:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: Horse, Elliott Jackalope (#2)

Ross Perot could have gone somewhere in his Third Party bid but he chose to fritter away his momentum.

He got death threats from the PTBs.

christine  posted on  2006-04-28 00:02:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]