[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Jimmy Dore: CHINA & 20 Nations To Intervene & End Israel’s Genocide!

20,000 Women. 350 Kilometers. Zero Pay. In One Week. How Did Ibrahim Traore Pull This Off?

Spain is in CHAOS! Revolution is in the air

Joe Rogan Ambushes Gavin Newsom Via Text With A COVID Question He Never Saw Coming

Batman Vs The Joker: Democrats Will Double Down On Chaos To Save Their Party

US Vows To Quit IEA If The Agency Keeps Pushing Green Transition

Tucker Carlson: People Are Frustrated That Certain Commit Crimes With Impunity

No news again, but the battle of the machines marches on...

Cash Jordan: Rioters ATTACK ICE HQ… Troops FLATTEN Uprising With ‘Zero Mercy’

Doctor Reveals What COVID Vaccines Do to the Lungs in Just One Week

Sorry paid off influencers, MAGA bot accounts, and Satan....but I'm not going to just "move on"

Marjorie Taylor Greene Bombshell Interview

Welcome To The Land Of The Free... Until You Express An Opinion

Putin ‘tells Iran to accept nuclear deal with no enrichment’

76% of Honey at Stores is Fake

"225,000 Ukrainians have now DESERTED the war" Ukraine is in a death spiral Col. Dan Davis

The New York Times Finally Stops Avoiding The G-Word

The Gaza Water Massacre: What Israel Just Confessed About Shooting Children

Powerful ERUPTION spit out volcanic mud and debris - Army Personnel ran for their lives

Another 'Conspiracy Theory' Comes True: California Bill Passes To Buy Fire-Ravaged Palisades For Low-Income Apartments

A 1,600-year-old church in the Holy Land has been torched. But not by ISIS.

More civilians have been killed while seeking aid in Gaza than were killed on 7 October.

MORE TRANS VIOLENCE

WAYNE ROOT: Here’s How Trump Turns the Epstein List Fiasco into Home Run

Maxwell Says Epstein Client List Implicates Top Democrats

Medical Record Review Of the Twins Who Died After Vaccination

New federal secrets exposed as Republican unravels Lee Harvey Oswald's hidden ties to CIA

Protest outside migrant hotel in Essex erupts into violence

Congressman Faces Eviction Over $85k Back-Rent For Luxury DC Penthouse

This Is Not Normal! We Just Had Four “1-In-1,000-Year Storms” In A Single Week!


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll
Source: WorldNetDaily.com
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49945
Published: Apr 27, 2006
Author: WND
Post Date: 2006-04-27 20:02:19 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 241
Comments: 11

ELECTION 2008 Poll: 3rd party scores with border backlash Presidential candidate focused on fence, enforcement would tie Dems, beat GOP Posted: April 27, 2006 2:31 p.m. Eastern

© 2006 http://WorldNetDaily.com

A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll.

The Rasmussen Reports national survey asked respondents how they would vote if "a third party candidate ran in 2008 and promised to build a barrier along the Mexican border and make enforcement of immigration law his top priority."

In that scenario, Democrats, with 31 percent, would be in a virtual tie with the third-party candidate, with 30 percent of the vote. The Republican candidate would be favored by only 21 percent.

Rasmussen comments that the result "probably reflects unhappiness with both parties on the immigration issue rather than a true opportunity for a third party."

Historically, the pollster points out, issues that drive third-party candidates are co-opted by one of the major parties as they prove popular.

Rasmussen surveys have indicated most Americans favor a barrier along the border and enforcement of existing laws prior to other reforms.

Without the third-party candidate, according to the new poll, Democrats hold a 12-point advantage over Republicans on a generic 2008 presidential ballot, 44 percent to 32 percent.

Rasmussen said these figures likely are a reflection of unhappiness with the Bush administration rather than a commentary on prospective candidates from either party.

The latest poll found that with the immigration-issue candidate as an option, 36 percent of voters who identified as conservatives chose the Republican candidate while 35 percent picked the third-party option.

Among political moderates, 34 percent chose the Democrat while 32 percent preferred the third-party candidate.

In contrast to issues such as Iraq and the economy, Rasmussen sees immigration as unsettling for the status quo "because it cuts across the typical partisan and ideological lines in ways that could reshape the nation's political equilibrium."

By emphasizing enforcement of the law, Democrats have leaped ahead of Republicans in the latest poll asking Americans which party they trust more on the issue of illegal immigration.

As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, a Rasmussen survey found more Americans trust Democrats on the immigration issue than Republicans, a recent reversal that has come as Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean declares enforcement of the border his party's top priority.

An earlier survey found that, in a hypothetical race for Congress, a plurality of Americans would vote for the candidate who favors more enforcement on the immigration issue.

Another earlier survey found two-thirds of Americans believe it doesn't make sense to debate new immigration laws until we can first control our borders and enforce existing laws.

That same survey found 40 percent of Americans favor "forcibly" requiring all 11 million illegal immigrants to leave the United States.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: Mind_Virus (#0)

Third party candidate! HOO HOO HA HA HO HO HO! Look folks, a third-party candidate could get 99.99995% of the popular vote, and would still lose to the selected RepubliCrat candidate, alright? Third parties! What a laugh. Ya gets to pick from RepubliCrat shill "A" or RepubliCrat shill "B", and that's your choice, got it? Third party. HO HO HO HO HO! Seriously, what do you people think, that we live in a democracy or something? We live in a corporate dictatorship. Deal with it.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2006-04-27   20:06:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Elliott Jackalope (#1)

Ross Perot could have gone somewhere in his Third Party bid but he chose to fritter away his momentum. A Third Party candidate with Ross's money could win on 2 issues: 1) Immigration 2) 9-11 Truth movement. But then these "lone assassins" really seem to hate honest men who see the light. I am not convinced that we will have elections in 2008 and that we will remain a sovereign nation until whoever wins will finish his or her first term.

Horse  posted on  2006-04-27   23:19:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Horse, Elliott Jackalope (#2)

Ross Perot could have gone somewhere in his Third Party bid but he chose to fritter away his momentum.

He got death threats from the PTBs.

christine  posted on  2006-04-28   0:02:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#3)

Ross Perot could have gone somewhere in his Third Party bid but he chose to fritter away his momentum. He got death threats from the PTBs

Back in '91 Perot waw well ahead of Bushie the Elder and Clinton in the polls. Then he had a pow-wow with some big Wall Street tycoons and unexpectedly dropped out of the presidential race. He re-entered the race but was only a shadow of his former self, at the end he still got 19% of the vote.

The Establishment will either underminmine or, if necessary, assassinate any threats to its power. Since JFK, Washinton has been under the control of a shadow government.

Zoroaster  posted on  2006-04-28   4:27:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Zoroaster (#4)

Since JFK, Washinton has been under the control of a shadow government.

I would say since Woodrow Wilson.

RickyJ  posted on  2006-04-28   4:51:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: RickyJ (#5)

Since JFK, Washinton has been under the control of a shadow government. I would say since Woodrow Wilson.

Good point, it might be said JFK was about to overturn Wilson's sellout, beginning with the Federal Reserve.

Zoroaster  posted on  2006-04-28   5:00:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]