[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll
Source: WorldNetDaily.com
URL Source: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49945
Published: Apr 27, 2006
Author: WND
Post Date: 2006-04-27 20:02:19 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 265
Comments: 11

ELECTION 2008 Poll: 3rd party scores with border backlash Presidential candidate focused on fence, enforcement would tie Dems, beat GOP Posted: April 27, 2006 2:31 p.m. Eastern

© 2006 http://WorldNetDaily.com

A Generic Third-Party Presidential Candidate Emphasizing Border Security Would Tie A Democratic Candidate And Defeat A Republican, According To A New Poll.

The Rasmussen Reports national survey asked respondents how they would vote if "a third party candidate ran in 2008 and promised to build a barrier along the Mexican border and make enforcement of immigration law his top priority."

In that scenario, Democrats, with 31 percent, would be in a virtual tie with the third-party candidate, with 30 percent of the vote. The Republican candidate would be favored by only 21 percent.

Rasmussen comments that the result "probably reflects unhappiness with both parties on the immigration issue rather than a true opportunity for a third party."

Historically, the pollster points out, issues that drive third-party candidates are co-opted by one of the major parties as they prove popular.

Rasmussen surveys have indicated most Americans favor a barrier along the border and enforcement of existing laws prior to other reforms.

Without the third-party candidate, according to the new poll, Democrats hold a 12-point advantage over Republicans on a generic 2008 presidential ballot, 44 percent to 32 percent.

Rasmussen said these figures likely are a reflection of unhappiness with the Bush administration rather than a commentary on prospective candidates from either party.

The latest poll found that with the immigration-issue candidate as an option, 36 percent of voters who identified as conservatives chose the Republican candidate while 35 percent picked the third-party option.

Among political moderates, 34 percent chose the Democrat while 32 percent preferred the third-party candidate.

In contrast to issues such as Iraq and the economy, Rasmussen sees immigration as unsettling for the status quo "because it cuts across the typical partisan and ideological lines in ways that could reshape the nation's political equilibrium."

By emphasizing enforcement of the law, Democrats have leaped ahead of Republicans in the latest poll asking Americans which party they trust more on the issue of illegal immigration.

As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, a Rasmussen survey found more Americans trust Democrats on the immigration issue than Republicans, a recent reversal that has come as Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean declares enforcement of the border his party's top priority.

An earlier survey found that, in a hypothetical race for Congress, a plurality of Americans would vote for the candidate who favors more enforcement on the immigration issue.

Another earlier survey found two-thirds of Americans believe it doesn't make sense to debate new immigration laws until we can first control our borders and enforce existing laws.

That same survey found 40 percent of Americans favor "forcibly" requiring all 11 million illegal immigrants to leave the United States.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#7. To: Mind_Virus (#0)

Let's see... When I talk to the rest of the dumbed down sheep in this country, I run into the same issues. Democrats, and Republicans. They define their politics by THESE TWO PARTIES.

When I brought up being a Constitutionalist, they looked at me like I came from another planet. They asked, Is that like a libertarian? I said yes. Only smarter, and not quite as retarded.

I then explained the Constitution Party platform, and while they seemed to understand it, they all seem to be averse to anything that isn't what they've been doing their entire fucking lives.

Sheep are sheep and they will not stop being sheep just because you want them to.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2006-04-28   5:01:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 7.

#10. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#7)

I then explained the Constitution Party platform,

Save your time and energy. It's over as far as the political system. I'm not quite sure what the answer is, but I know what it isn't.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2006-04-28 07:24:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]