Title: Saudi Arabia's Role in 9/11 and Why the U.S. Government has Kept it Hidden Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nnz0YRy6So Published:Jan 2, 2020 Author:Dartmouth Post Date:2021-10-31 19:25:10 by BTP Holdings Keywords:None Views:84 Comments:2
Saudi Arabia's Role in 9/11 and Why the U.S. Government has Kept it Hidden Given by James Kreindler ’77, Partner, Kreindler & Kreindler LLP.
Currently, Mr. Kreindler is the co-chair of the Plaintiff’s Committee in the 9/11 Litigation on behalf of the 9/11 families to hold Saudi Arabia accountable for its role in the 9/11 attacks. The lawsuit alleges that members of the government of Saudi Arabia provided critical financial and logistical support to the 9/11 hijackers prior to September 11, 2001. This is the first case to proceed under the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, passed by Congress in 2016.
Sponsored by the John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding
Recorded Monday, October 28, 2019
Poster Comment:
The facts are there were no hijackers on the planes that hit the Twin Towers of the Pentagon. The QRS-11 Flight Interruptor microchip had been installed in all commercial aircraft in the 1990s as a means to remotely take over the controls of the aircraft and land the planes in case of hijacking. This remote controls can be activated from a couple hundred miles away. Hillary Clinton's Rose Law Firm had filed the patents on the QRS-11 chip.
Even so, the Madrassa's in Saudi Arabia are the source of all of the Islamic fundamentalist Wahhabism in the world today.
"The government ruling us draws its authority not from the principles of the Declaration of Independence, or even from the delegate powers listed in the U.S. Constitution, but rather from the war to re-conquer the independent South. That conflict, usually referred to by the artfully misleading title “Civil War,” established the fact that the government in Washington is willing to kill Americans in whatever quantity it deems necessary in order to enforce its edicts, and then sanctify the slaughter in the name of some suitably “progressive” social objective.