[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Health See other Health Articles Title: Biden Administration Begs, Pleads With Supreme Court — But They Aren’t Getting Anywhere Biden Administration Begs, Pleads With Supreme Court — But They Aren’t Getting Anywhere December 17, 2021 by Sebastian Hayworth The administration asked the justices to allow the “urgently needed health and safety measure to take effect before the winter spike in COVID-19 cases worsens further.” It said the requirement “will save hundreds or even thousands of lives each month.” Meanwhile, the mandate that will supposedly save hundreds or even thousands of lives has saved virtually zero in states authorized to impose such restrictions. The news also comes at a time when the propagandist narrative on the efficacy of vaccination in the face of a new variant is lopsided and logically unsound. According to Fauci, the so-called Omicron variant is supposedly less lethal than Delta, and Omicron cases are usurping all other variant cases, yet the rise in Omicron cases has caused a resurgence of past restrictive lockdown measures. In other words, more people are becoming infected with a less deadly variant yet Democrats still insist on imposing previous lockdown measures which applied to more deadly variants. Make it make sense. The administration’s request comes a day after the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted a nationwide ban on the mandate. The court instead allowed the mandate to remain blocked in 14 states that had collectively sued in federal court in Louisiana. That action altered a Nov. 30 ruling by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, who originally applied his order nationwide. A different appeals court, the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, has declined to disturb a lower court order blocking the mandate in 10 other states. The Biden administration asked the justices to allow the mandate to take effect in the 24 states covered by those two courts’ decisions. A federal judge in Texas granted an injunction Thursday that applies only to that state. One other appeals court, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, allowed the mandate to remain in place, saying Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra has the authority to require the vaccines. At issue before the Supreme Court is a rule published Nov. 5 by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid that applies to a wide range of health care providers that receive federal Medicare or Medicaid funding. It required their workers to receive the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by Dec. 6 and be fully vaccinated by Jan. 4. It was projected to affect more than 17 million workers in about 76,000 health care facilities as well as home health care providers. The mandate has religious and medical exemptions. Legal challenges to Biden’s vaccine mandate for private employers are also ongoing. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||