Big Pharma Advertising Dollars Are at an All-Time High
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 06, 2022
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
> The drug industry influences and manipulates media through advertising dollars. In 2021, drug companies spent an aggregate $6.88 BILLION on direct-to-consumer advertising (DCTA), up slightly from $6.86 billion in 2020 > The U.S. and New Zealand are the only two countries that permit DCTA, making media in these countries more likely to have pro-pharma bias The Will Smith-Chris Rock drama during the Oscars may have been nothing more than a subliminal publicity stunt for Pfizers upcoming alopecia drug > Over the past year, the U.S. government spent $1 billion of U.S. taxpayers money to advertise the COVID jab, which is the most dangerous and least proven drug ever marketed, while simultaneously calling for the censorship of anyone who dared to address the risks of this novel treatment > By law, drug ads must not be false or misleading, must present a fair balance of information describing both the risks and benefits of a drug, must include facts that are material to the products advertised uses, and must include a brief summary that mentions every risk described in the products labeling. Few if any ads for the COVID jab have fulfilled these requirements
How do you control major media? The short answer illustrated in the video above is: through advertising dollars. Big Pharma advertising dominates, making up a large portion of a given media outlets revenue, and that funding gives Pharma the power to dictate what ends up in the news and what doesnt.
While Big Pharma has frequently spent more on advertising than on research and development, over the past couple of years, ad spending has increased to new heights.1
In 2021, drug companies spent an aggregate $6.88 BILLION on direct-to- consumer advertising (DTCA), up slightly from $6.86 billion in 2020.2 And, remember, DTCA is only permitted in two countries in the world, the U.S. and New Zealand, so media tend to be particularly biased in favor of Big Pharma those two countries.
Did Will Smith Smack Chris Rock on Behalf of Sponsors?
Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Incyte and Exact Sciences even sponsored the 2022 Academy Awards, which was an unusual turn for the industry, according to some biopharma professionals.3 Chances are you heard about how Will Smith smacked Chris Rock across the face. Smith supposedly took offense over a comment about his wifes lack of hair.
Jada Pinkett Smith has alopecia areata, which is believed to be an autoimmune disorder. Isnt it amazing, then, that Pfizer, a primary sponsor of this years Oscars,4 is working on an alopecia drug? They announced top-line results from a Phase 2b/3 trial in August 2021.5
Its especially curious since three of the other sponsors Eli Lilly, Incyte (partnering with Lilly) and Novartis also have alopecia drugs nearly ready to go.6,7,8 Coincidence? Or a cleverly disguised publicity stunt for soon-to-be-released drugs? If the latter, it would put a whole new spin on the concept of subliminal advertising.
Taxpayer Money Used to Advertise Most Dangerous Drug Ever