Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: The riveting ‘2000 Mules’ proves there was massive election fraud
Source: [None]
URL Source: ... as_massive_election_fraud.html
Published: May 9, 2022
Author: Andrea Widburg
Post Date: 2022-05-09 09:53:05 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 298
Comments: 7

Dinesh D’Souza is an effective filmmaker and he didn’t disappoint with 2000 Mules, a riveting documentary examining the way leftist organizations used activists to stuff ballots in the 2020 election (and the 2020 Georgia run-off election that handed the Senate to the Democrats). However, after watching it, I felt there were some unanswered questions that also deserve scrutiny so I hope D’Souza follows up on these issues.

2000 Mules begins with the premise that Trump voters have found it impossible to believe that Trump lost the election. When they contrast his campaign appearances (60,000 screaming fans) with Biden’s campaign appearances (6 vaguely animated lumps sitting in little circles); the bellwether counties states showing Trump winning by a large margin; the significant gains Trump made with Hispanics and Blacks; the millions of votes Trump gained over the four years of his presidency; and the mysterious overnight counting shut-down in the states that ultimately gave Biden his “victory,” they know that something is wrong.

The folks at True the Vote also suspected that something was wrong, very wrong. The founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, working with Gregg Philips and a team of computer analysts, came up with a very clever way to determine whether there was fraud. They suspected as much, thanks to the way in which Democrats in key states used COVID as an excuse to increase absentee voting. That included states which allowed only absentee voting with drop boxes across cities and towns, where there had been massive ballot harvesting. That is, people, both real and fake, didn’t fill out their own ballots. Instead, they were collected, completed, and put into drop boxes by partisan and paid activists.

To prove this theory, True the Vote obtained geo-tracking information for major urban areas in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona, allowing them to follow cell phone signals. They marked all the drop boxes and all the facilities for left-wing non-profits. They then looked for cell phones that traveled between the non-profits and drop boxes at least ten times (to be sure to winnow out statistical noise). Through FOIA requests, they also obtained as many videos as they could showing people stuffing multiple ballots into the drop boxes, a completely illegal act.

Their data revealed 2,200 mules in just five cities, visiting between 20 and 45 drop boxes each, at which they dropped off an average of five ballots. When you do the math, the numbers are staggering:

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Who cares? Voting makes no difference.

DWornock  posted on  2022-05-09   17:18:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: DWornock (#1)

Voting makes no difference.

Voting made a big difference in 2016 when Trump trounced Hildabeast.

Then in 2020 the election fraud was perfected from when Hillary ran in 2016. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2022-05-09   19:39:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: BTP Holdings (#2)


“ On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. ” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2022-05-09   21:58:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: Ada (#0)

My review:

“2000 Mules” Not The Slam Dunk I Thought it Would Be

What the hell kind of country is this where I can only hate a man if he's white?

Bill D Berger  posted on  2022-05-10   3:11:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#5. To: BTP Holdings (#2)

Voting made a big difference in 2016 when Trump trounced Hildabeast.

Actually, other than the talk, it made very little difference because, in most areas, the actions of Trump was very similar to what Hillary would have done. Trump's appointees were all statists and Hillary's appointees would have all been statists.

Trump talked a good talk to get elected but once in office he showed his true colors. Of course, most of his supporters claim that is what he did because he had to and in the next election he would be different.

DWornock  posted on  2022-05-10   5:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#6. To: DWornock (#5)

once in office he showed his true colors

He did. Once in office Trump reversed all of Obama's unlawful Executive Orders. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2022-05-10   8:43:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: BTP Holdings (#6)

It is obvious to me that you know a lot of details that I'm not aware of.

DWornock  posted on  2022-05-10   9:46:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest