[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least

"This Is The Next Level": AI-Powered "Digital Workers" Deployed At Major Bank To Work Alongside Humans


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: February 9, 2005: Bush budget scraps 9,790 border patrol agents
Source: San Francisico Gate
URL Source: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... ive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL
Published: Feb 9, 2005
Author: Michael Hedges
Post Date: 2006-05-15 20:10:36 by Zipporah
Keywords: None
Views: 53
Comments: 2

Washington -- The law signed by President Bush less than two months ago to add thousands of border patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexico border has crashed into the reality of Bush's austere federal budget proposal, officials said Tuesday.

Officially approved by Bush on Dec. 17 after extensive bickering in Congress, the National Intelligence Reform Act included the requirement to add 10,000 border patrol agents in the five years beginning with 2006. Roughly 80 percent of the agents were to patrol the southern U.S. border from Texas to California, along which thousands of people cross into the United States illegally every year.

But Bush's proposed 2006 budget, revealed Monday, funds only 210 new border agents.

The shrunken increase reflects the lack of money for an army of border guards and the capacity to train them, officials said.

Retired Adm. James Loy, acting head of the Department of Homeland Security until nominee Michael Chertoff takes over, said funding only 210 new agents was a "recognition that we need to balance those things as we go on down the road with other priorities."

The White House referred questions about the border agents to the Homeland Security Department.

The law signed by Bush had a caveat that went virtually unreported at the time. A summary, published by the Senate Government Affairs Committee, required the government to increase the number of border patrol agents by at least 2,000 per year, "subject to available appropriations."

Democrats were unhappy that the proposed budget used the escape clause so soon after the president approved the huge boost in border agents.

"We know we must do more to shore up security along our borders," said Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, top Democrat on the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee. "The president's budget does not even attempt to meet this challenge."

Some Republicans also were displeased.

"This is an area of homeland security that needs to be ramped up in order to increase surveillance and patrols of our nation's vast and often remote borders," said Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, chair of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

A Jan. 24 letter signed by leading Republican lawmakers implored the president to fully fund the new law "in order to secure our borders against infiltration by terrorists."

The lead signer was Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a leader of GOP efforts to toughen immigration laws and anti-terrorism statutes.


Poster Comment:

SO first he cuts the budget last YEAR for border agents so NOW this is a problem? This speech is BS IMO.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zipporah (#0)

He lied again -- like everytime he opens his mouth.

Also, some of the Border Patrol agents were sent to Iraq to train Iraqis on how to protect their borders.

ratcat  posted on  2006-05-15   23:44:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Zipporah (#0)

http:/ /www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/05/20060515-8.html

Since I became President, we've increased funding for border security by 66 percent, and expanded the Border Patrol from about 9,000 to 12,000 agents. The men and women of our Border Patrol are doing a fine job in difficult circumstances, and over the past five years, they have apprehended and sent home about six million people entering America illegally.

Despite this progress, we do not yet have full control of the border, and I am determined to change that. Tonight I'm calling on Congress to provide funding for dramatic improvements in manpower and technology at the border. By the end of 2008, we'll increase the number of Border Patrol officers by an additional 6, 000. When these new agents are deployed, we'll have more than doubled the size of the Border Patrol during my presidency. ______________________________________________

http://www.local2544.org/ --- US Border Patrol

New Vehicles on the Way! - Well, 80 new vehicles are on the way to Tucson Sector.......for the entire year. Thats right, 80. 10 vehicles for each station .....maybe.....if somebody at the top of the food chain doesn't decide they need a few of them. We need 1,000 new vehicles, and they send us 80.

As we stated months ago here, get used to driving the worn out junk you're driving now. 100,000 miles on the odometer is just getting that fine patrol vehicle broken in good. Once again, our Washington DC gang lets us down. The INS used to steal all our vehicle money every year when disgraceful people like Johnny "Every Apprehension is a Failure" Williams were in charge. But now, with the new and improved DHS & Customs running the show it's all better.

Trust us. Year after year after year the American people are fleeced into thinking the politicians are "serious" about "securing our borders", and year after year they are lied to. Anybody who thinks anything has substantively changed for the better during the last 20 years is delusional. It's worse now than it was 20 years ago. Much worse. Despite all the tough talk and the chest thumping, the sad fact of the matter remains that millions more illegal aliens are in this country, millions more are coming, anybody who really wants in will get in, and very little is being done about it. If hot air was an enforcement tool we wouldn't have an illegal immigration problem.

Unfortunately, hot air only confuses many, pacifies some, and frustrates those of us who see what a complete bunch of BS it really is. Anybody who challenges the front-line agents on that fact needs a little truth serum administered. The smoke-and-mirrors games continue every year, and the clueless, self-serving faces at the top of our Agency change, but the facts don't change. The American people who currently don't have to deal with rampant illegal immigration better brace themselves. It's coming to their neighborhoods soon. While Bush is in office nothing will get done. That much is obvious after 6 years.

And the current crop of prospective presidents who are posturing for a run in 2008, including our wonderful in-state non-supporter, "Amnesty John" McCain, will probably be worse. That should take us through 2012, when we'll be hearing the same old tired "get tough" political posturing over "securing our borders" all over again. Does anybody really think Hillary Clinton is going to be a tough, enforcement minded leader on illegal immigration if she gets elected? Get real folks.

ratcat  posted on  2006-05-15   23:59:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]