[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Immigration See other Immigration Articles Title: Migrants scoff at border patrol plan Migrants scoff at border patrol plan By Marina Montemayor CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico – Looking for someone to help him cross into the United States, Jorge Gutierrez said Monday it will take a lot more than U.S. National Guard troops to keep him and other migrants out. Most Mexicans believe the plan, announced Monday night by President Bush, will do little to stop the flow north. President Vicente Fox called Bush this weekend to say he did not believe sending soldiers to the border was the answer. The countries have rarely seen eye-to-eye since Bush and Fox agreed to work toward immigration issues five years ago at a meeting at Fox’s ranch in Mexico. Fox wants the Bush administration to give amnesty to millions of migrants living in the U.S. and allow more to seek jobs legally from outside the country. Bush rejected the idea of an amnesty and instead proposed allowing people with job offers to enter the United States and work legally for three years. The topic has generated a heated debate in Congress, where members are divided between those who simply want to lock down the border and those who also want more comprehensive proposals. Bush proposed sending National Guard troops to the border as a stopgap measure while the Border Patrol builds up its resources to more effectively secure the 2,000-mile line between the U.S. and Mexico. The move is aimed at winning support for immigration overhaul from conservatives who are more interested in tightening security along the border. Gutierrez, who had just arrived in Juarez from Torreon to look for a way to cross illegally into the United States, said he didn’t believe the troops would make a difference. “No Guard, no wall will keep us from crossing,” he said. Jesus Rodriguez, 49, agreed. He was looking for ways to cross one of Juarez’s international bridges. “For Mexicans, there are no obstacles,” he said. Francisco Loureiro, who runs a migrant shelter in Nogales, across the border from Nogales, Ariz., criticized the plan as an “aggressive action more than anything because the migrant is not a criminal or a terrorist.” “His only objective is to work … and a government that supposedly lobbies for world peace is now acting against defenseless migrants who are helping to fill a need for employers in the U.S.” Presidential spokesman Ruben Aguilar told reporters Monday that while Fox “expressed his concern” over the proposal to Bush, he had no choice but to respect it. “It is a sovereign decision,” he said. “We can’t interfere.” Mexico has had a tough time convincing the U.S. that it is doing everything it can to prevent and provide alternatives to illegal migration, especially when it is dependent on the remittances migrants send home. In 2005, migrants sent about $2034;billion to Mexico, where remittances represent the second-largest source of foreign income, after oil sales.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: Tauzero (#0)
I believe a WALL would.
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||