[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News See other National News Articles Title: Gun Control Narrative Omits Cases Where Guns Save Lives: Erich Pratt Authored by Mimi Nguyen Ly and Steve Lance via The Epoch Times The lefts push for more gun control omit the many cases that go against their narrative, such as instances where guns were used to neutralize shooters, according to Erich Pratt, the senior vice president of Gun Owners of America (GOA), a gun rights advocacy organization that represents more than 2 million Americans. The left is all about pushing gun control. Its absolutely disgusting what theyre doing. Theyre pushing gun control, theyre fundraising off of this within hours of the shooting, Pratt told NTDs Capitol Report, referring to the May 24 shooting that killed 21 people at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. And really, its despicable because it becomes clear they only care about certain deaths, he said. Politicians and activists pushing for gun control neglect to talk about cities that already have the policies they want to implement for the entire nation, he said. For example, more than 40 people have been shot and killed in Chicago this month. In the last 30 days, in Baltimore, there had been 20 people shot and killed. But the left is not talking about that. Theyre not fundraising off of Chicago or Baltimore because they already have very strict gun control, Pratt noted. Those cities dont serve their cause[they] have red-flag, gun confiscation orders, they have universal background registration checks, they have so-called assault weapons bans, they have everything that the left is trying to push on us, and yet they have murders out the wazoo in those two cities that they cant control it. And what that tells us, obviously, is that gun control is not the answer, he said. Pratt noted examples of past deadly attacks that did not involve guns, and said that blaming a certain instrument for mass attacks is short-sighted because no law that bans a certain object is going to stop an evil-determined heart from killing. Whats amazing, and this is one of the things that the anti-gun left does, is they only talk about certain uses of a firearm, which fit their narrative when theyre used in a bad way. But then they wont talk about firearms when theyre actually used to stop mass shootings, Pratt said. Pratt noted how, on May 25, the day after the mass shooting in Uvalde, a woman with a concealed carry permit in West Virginia shot and killed a man who had started firing an AR-style rifle into a crowd of people at a birthday-graduation party. He accused the left-wing media of generating opposition to peoples Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms by only selectively talking about certain stories, and neglecting stories that show how guns may be used to avert more deaths. A lot of times where there has been a lot of killing
they are brought to an end by a good guy with a gun, he said. Pratt shared the story of Stephen Willeford, who is currently GOAs spokesperson. As an armed citizen, Willeford in November 2017 stopped a shooter at a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, from potentially killing more people. Sadly, everyone at that church in Sutherland Springs did not have a gun on that day except for the bad guy, Pratt said. But when Steven Willeford, who lived down the street heard the shooting, he ran out of his house barefoot with his AR-15 [and] called the guy out of the church. That guy came out and Steven mortally wounded him. I mean, the guy got in his car, drove off but eventually took his own life because he was wounded so bad, he continued. The FBI cited that case and many other cases as examples where armed citizens use guns to stop attempted mass murders. Pratt argued against the concept of gun-free zones, saying they only serve to be places where shooters seek to go. The Uvalde shooting was an example of that, he noted. Its really important to point out that in most cases, these killers will try to seek out a location where its a gun-free zone. You know, 81 percent of police agree that teachers and staff should be armed, and with good reason because no school has ever had a mass shooting where there were armed teachers and staff, he said. But tragically, that wasnt the case at the Texas School. Police were reportedly not quick to rush in. And this Texas school didnt take part in the program that allows teachers to be armed, so it was a gun-free zone. And again, thats what killers often choose to target. And why would 94 percent of mass shooters target gun-free zones? Because they dont want bullets being fired back at them. Thats why they dont target police stations or gun shows because killers love gun control. And sadly, thats what enabled this killer in Texas. Poster Comment: The Uvalde shooter was unemployed but was able to buy $9,000 in guns and ammo. Who paid for it? He was killing cats and he pulverized a little dog in a public park. He went around at night firing a beebee gun at people. He threatened to kidnap and rape women. If the police had done their duty, he would never have gotten a permit to buy a gun. The school did not allow teachers to arm themselves. Israel has armed teachers and no school shootings. On the day of the shooting he began firing outside the school. The police station was a mile away but the cops did not stop him before he entered the building. Blue states have laws that stop law abiding citizens from arming themselves. But they do not enforce laws against convicted criminals. In NYC the recent subway killer had 20 previous arrests including a conviction for attempted murder. He was let out of prison after 3 months despite numerous felony convictions. He should have been serving life as a 3 time loser. What good does it do to pass more laws that are only selectively enforced. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|