[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
National News See other National News Articles Title: The Fifth Impeachment: DOJ Says They’re Investigating Donald Trump for Obstruction Is this the fifth or sixth impeachment? I don’t even think I can count this high. Wall Street Journal: The Justice Department said “efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation” of documents at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home months before FBI agents searched the Florida estate in early August. Investigators said they found records in places other than the storage room where Mr. Trump’s lawyers had assured them all were held. A court filing late Tuesday objecting to Mr. Trump’s proposal that the seized documents be vetted by a third-party arbiter laid out the government’s most detailed timeline yet of the events that led to the unprecedented search of the premises. The 36-page document underscored the urgency with which the Justice Department believed it needed to secure the classified material after Mr. Trump’s team failed to relinquish all of it during several less invasive attempts to retrieve it earlier this year. Those steps included a grand jury subpoena issued to Mr. Trump’s team in May seeking all classified documents from the premises. Just a reminder: it is impossible for the president to steal classified documents. It’s basically the same thing as “spousal rape” – it is legally impossible (or it was until Jews decided to confuse ancient law for their own purposes). Also, presidents regularly take stores of documents to work on their memoirs. Also, Hillary Clinton wasn’t prosecuted for actually committing this crime – the FBI said they weren’t prosecuting her because she was famous and it would be socially negative to prosecute a famous politician. According to the government’s filing, a representative of Mr. Trump handed over an accordion folder of documents when FBI agents visited the Palm Beach property on June 3. Another representative then attested in writing that the team had supplied “any and all documents that are responsive to the subpoena,” according to the filing. Further investigation showed that not to be the case, the Justice Department said. What was the investigation? Was it more electronic spying? Because it sounds to me like he had handed over the physical copies of the documents and they are preparing to claim he had electronic copies, which they know because they hacked his computers (on yet another fishing expedition). Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||