Out of the mouths of babes and propagandists... shed a big front-page story that begins:
The United States secretly manufactured biological weapons in Ukraine. It trained birds to carry pathogens into Russia. It created Covid-19.
My first reaction: Yowza! Man bites dog! NYT tells truth! MSM is stealing our stuff! Id better invite this NYT journalist, Steven Lee Myers, as a guest commentator on False Flag Weekly News!
Then I read the second paragraph:
Of the many falsehoods that the Kremlin has spread since the war in Ukraine began more than six months ago, some of the most outlandish and yet enduring have been those accusing the United States of operating clandestine biological research programs to wreak havoc around the globe.
So the first paragraph had been an innoculation, and the second paragraph the desired immune response.
Regime propagandists have been using this immunization technique intensively for at least a decade. After 9/11 and the widespread loss of faith in the official story, a cottage industry sprung up in academia, heavily funded by grant money, looking at ways to cure conspiracy theories. (The seminal contribution to the emerging field was Cass Sunsteins Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.) A consenus emerged that since conspiracy theories were a viral disease, the authorities should innoculate those who had not yet been exposed, while locking down the carriers (conspiracy theorists) off in the far corners of the internet where they wouldnt infect the normies.
So how do you innoculate someone against conspiracy theories? Simple: You state the conspiracy theory (i.e. you inject the subject with a small dose of the toxic, contagious idea) and then debunk it (building an immune response in the subject). Thats what the above-cited New York Times story tries to accomplish in its first two paragraphs.
Note that the Times debunking atttempt doesnt actually engage in factual debate. It doesnt have to. Most people are dominated by emotional, impressionistic thinking. So smearing the theory that COVID came from a US bioweapons lab as an outrageous falsehood and Kremlin propaganda suffices to innoculate the average NYT reader.
One thing the NYT innoculation attempt, I mean, news story, fails to mention, is the fact that the Chair of The Lancets COVID Origins Commission, Jeffrey Sachs, has made it clear that he thinks COVID did originate in a US bioweapons lab. As Ron Unz has noted, thats a bit like Philip Zelikow, Chair of the 9/11 Commission, saying 9/11 was an inside job. If such a thing happened The New York Times probably wouldnt mention that, either.
Jeffrey Sachs is a consumate insider. Hes the last person on earth anyone would call a Russian stooge. Sachs was actually a prime villain in the 1990s looting of Russia, as explained in Naomi Kleins The Shock Doctrine. Maybe hes telling the truth now because he wants to be remembered for doing something admirable rather than reprehensible.
Why did The New York Times, the leading propaganda organ of the Deep State, find it necessary to run a big front-page innoculation against COVID origin conspiracy theories? I would like to think its because I just published What America Needs Right Now Is a COVID Origins Truth Movementand then highlighted it during this weeks False Flag Weekly News broadcast. Or because my video with Ron Unz COVID-19 Bio-Attack Smoking Gun! just broke 400,000 views on Rumble (the equivalent of millions of YouTube views).
Click for Full Text!