[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israeli Strikes On Iran Ongoing Through Friday As Death Toll Surpasses 100 From Torah to trauma: A Satanic child abuse scandal blows up in Israel MAGA Influencer Calls to Deploy Palantir on LA Streets Egypt detains nearly 200 foreigners who flew in to join Gaza march FLASHBACK - How Mayor Daley dealt with looters! Scammers Use AI Bots to Impersonate Students, Stealing Millions in Financial Aid Bilderberg 2025 begins. Global elites gather in Stockholm. AI, migration, and national security dominate I Wish We All Could Leave California (Beach Boys Parody) Exclusive: US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences Brilliant & Critical Insight! Legal Immigrants Shift to GOP on Immigration, Shows 40-Point Swing from Democrats American fuel tankers were spotted REFUELING ISRAELI JETS over Syria. Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist? Trump CLEARLY KNEW of Israel's Plan To STRIKE IRAN Trump Warns 'Even More Brutal' Attacks Coming Without Nuclear Deal 10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead' DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election! Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks? Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack' This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities… Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs White House Fears Iranian Response To An Attack Could Overwhelm Israel's Air Defenses The Money and Power Behind the Riots: This is No Grass-Roots Movement D.C. Judge Sides With Trump In Lawsuit Over Control Of Corrupt Foreign Aid Agency Israel Iran Double Standard Soros Funneled $8.3M into Leftist Group Trying to Turn Lone Star State Blue California Democrats Under Fire for Buying Bricks During Protests ICE Launches Campaign to Crack Down on Marriage Fraud Could Ilhan Omar Finally Face Justice?

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: The Nine Principles of the Goddess
Source: Sacred Texts
URL Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/wmn/bog/bog02.htm
Published: May 20, 2006
Author: Unknown
Post Date: 2006-05-20 02:25:01 by Pandora
Keywords: None
Views: 24846
Comments: 271

Here is an interesting philosophy. I've always liked this:

The Nine Principles of the Goddess

1. I acknowledge that there is one Goddess in essence, Creatrix of all existences; Her forms are infinite, She manifests Herself in our love, and we are all Her lovers.

2. Treat all beings with reciprocity, for the Goddess lives in them as well as in us.

3. Tolerate other religions and do not compel others to join the circle of the Goddess: the Goddess will draw those to Her who are ready and hear Her call.

4. Worship Her by restoring balance to Her planet.

5. Eat mostly grains, vegetables and fruits, so that there will be enough food for all; when you eat thank the Goddess, the provider of all energy. It is not forbidden to eat animal flesh in moderation, but when you do so you must thank the animal that you eat as well.

6. In the circle of the Goddess create consensus while respecting diversity of opinion. On the path of the Goddess there are many paths.

7. In your home create a sacred space for the Goddess to please Her. Meditate on the Goddess three times a day, at rising, at noon and at sundown.

8. Sexuality is Her sacrament; enjoy this gift and bless those who you share it with love and affection. Remember that overcoming jealousy is the cause of cessation of the cycle of rebirth.

9. Announce the religion of the Goddess to the world through good works, honest words and selfless acts of beauty and love.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 166.

#26. To: Pandora (#0)

The concept of a goddess is a satanist witch philisophy. There's only One God and the only way anyone has a chance to see him would be through Christ. This goddes crap will land you in HELL!

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-20   12:56:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The concept of a goddess is a satanist witch philisophy.

No it's not.

You are simply a fundamentalist Moslem or fundamentalist Christian control freak. I can't tell which and it doesn't really matter; the result is the same, i.e., you won't feel comfortable until you have foisted your medeival religion onto everyone else.

Some people don't want to be smothered in your security blanket. That is why the founding fathers added the First Amendment to the Constitution - to keep people like you at bay.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-20   20:35:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Some people don't want to be smothered in your security blanket. That is why the founding fathers added the First Amendment to the Constitution - to keep people like you at bay.

The first amendment "religion part" only applies to THE CONGRESS, not the states. Several states had STATE RELIGIONS THAT WERE CHRISTIAN.

The founding fathers would have burnt you at the stake. They knew a witch when they saw one.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-20   20:38:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Several states had STATE RELIGIONS THAT WERE CHRISTIAN.

There are no states with designated state religions. There may have been in the first intial confusion, or in the two years prior to the Bill of Rights, but certainly not after things got sorted out.

The religious zealots spent over one hundred years trying to pass an amendment making the US a Christian country. They failed and gave up shortly after the civil war.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-20   20:41:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

There are no states with designated state religions. There may have been in the first intial confusion, or in the two years prior to the Bill of Rights, but certainly not after things got sorted out.

The religious zealots spent over one hundred years trying to pass an amendment making the US a Christian country. They failed and gave up shortly after the civil war.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

sorted out, what the fuck you talking about? There it is plain as day. CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW...

That doesn't stop a GOVERNOR or STATE LEGISLATOR from making a state religion.

The United States was a "christian nation" meaning the people were almost all christians. The christians are the ones who to a great degree made this country what it was.

It was only after the government took prayer out of school and other such satanist stuff that our country went down the tubes.

It is satanists like yourself that are the problem. Bush is a satanist too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-20   20:47:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The United States was a "christian nation" meaning the people were almost all christians. The christians are the ones who to a great degree made this country what it was.

There is no state that has an officially designated religion. Likewise, the Federal Government has no designated or preferred state religion. This is in accordance with the First Amendment.

A governor of a state can't toss out the First Amendments. All of the Amendments were made applicable to the states in about 1920. I forget the precise case, but it was a Fourth Amendment matter. Given this, a state cannot designate a state religion.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-20   20:53:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

There is no state that has an officially designated religion. Likewise, the Federal Government has no designated or preferred state religion. This is in accordance with the First Amendment.

A governor of a state can't toss out the First Amendments. All of the Amendments were made applicable to the states in about 1920. I forget the precise case, but it was a Fourth Amendment matter. Given this, a state cannot designate a state religion.

Dont be stupid ok.

First amendment says CONGRESS. CONGRESS CONGRESS CONGRESS. II DOESNT SAY STATES CANT MAKE STATE RELIGIONS. IT SAYS CONGRESS FOR THE 10TH TIME.

WHAT DOES IT SAY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS JURISTDICTION IS....10 SQUARE MILES AND FEDERAL AREAS LIKE MILITARY BASES. SO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CANT IMPOSE A STATE RELIGION ON US.....THE STATES ARE FREE TO DO SO. IT IS NOT THAT COMPLICATED....EVEN A THIRD GRADER CAN UNDERSTAND IT....WHATS YOUR PROBLEM?

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-20   20:56:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Dont be stupid ok.

First amendment says CONGRESS. CONGRESS CONGRESS CONGRESS. II DOESNT SAY STATES CANT MAKE STATE RELIGIONS. IT SAYS CONGRESS FOR THE 10TH TIME.

You are dead wrong. Absolutely, 100% dead wrong.

Use google on read up on these things before pontificating.

Here is the quote from the relevant case:

"....when the right of local authorities to provide free transportation for children attending parochial schools reached the Court, it adopted very restrictive language. ''The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a STATE nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. NEITHER can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion. Neither a STATE nor the Federal Government can, openly or secretly, participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa. In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and State.'

98 U.S. 145, 164 (1879).

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-21   1:00:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Show me in the consittution where a court case trumps the constitution. SHow me in the consittution where it says anything about courts setting precedents ant that becomes the law. You have sided with the usurpers. Do you even know what that means. Quote from the constitution (the supreme law of the land) not some corrupt judicial decision. Laws that conflict with the constitution are not laws at all (even if a "judge" says they are) and are not to be obeyed.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   9:48:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Show me in the consittution where a court case trumps the constitution. SHow me in the consittution where it says anything about courts setting precedents ant that becomes the law.

Sure.

Use google and find a case called Marbury vs. Madison. This will explain it to you. I don't have time to explain high school civics here.

As I said above, the reality is that the states don't have the power to establish a state religion. As someone already noted on this thread, this was done to protect the population from people like you.

Your argument here is that you don't like it and that you wish the situation was different. When you finish with this argument, the states still do not have the power to establish a state religion.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-21   10:45:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Use google and find a case called Marbury vs. Madison

Yes the first usurption. Just because it happened long ago and set a precedent doesn't mean it is the law.

Get back to the root.

The constitution. If a law conflicts with it, no matter what some guy in a robe( who isn't really a citizen according to THE REAL 13th AMENDMENT) tells you. Use your own mind...the words have meaning. Dont let some judge steal your rights.

FUCK THE GOVERNMENT

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   10:53:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The constitution. If a law conflicts with it, no matter what some guy in a robe( who isn't really a citizen according to THE REAL 13th AMENDMENT) tells you. Use your own mind...the words have meaning. Dont let some judge steal your rights.

FUCK THE GOVERNMENT

I told you that the US Contstitution, as it has been understood by the US Supreme Court for over a century, does not allow the states to set up a state religion. In fact, it never allowed this. I presented both the case where this interpretation is made and the case that allows the Supreme Court to make this interpretation.

You are now arguing that if the United States Government went away, the States could then set up a state religion.

Do you realize how silly you sound when you back track this way?

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-21   11:07:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I told you that the US Contstitution, as it has been understood by the US Supreme Court for over a century, does not allow the states to set up a state religion

Ok that is your opinion. Now all you have to do to win the argument is show me from the constitution where the supreme court gets to decide and be the final arbitrator of the decision. Good luck, its not there.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   11:08:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I told you that the US Contstitution, as it has been understood by the US Supreme Court for over a century, does not allow the states to set up a state religion

Ok that is your opinion.

No. That is not my opinion. I didn't say a word.

You are spinning again.

That is the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. I quoted them to make my point. If you think this opinion is incorrect, cite a higher recognized authority that contradicts the opinion.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-21   11:15:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

cite a higher recognized authority that contradicts the opinion.

THE US CONSTITUTION

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   11:17:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

cite a higher recognized authority that contradicts the opinion.

THE US CONSTITUTION

Ok.

Show me where the Constitution says that Marbury vs Madison is incorrect.

Pandora  posted on  2006-05-21   11:25:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I already did. You don't get it. You're a waste of time. You seem to be of lower intelligence then most people i've talked to.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   11:26:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"I already did."

Okay, then what is that decision and what is is concerning? I'll bet you don't have a clue in that regard, do you?

"You don't get it."

Ah, but you are worked up precisely because we do get it. We understand you think you can get by in this sort of dialog without having to do any intellectual effort to develop insight and understanding regarding that which is talked of in thread.

"You're a waste of time. You seem to be of lower intelligence then most people i've talked to."

Your fall back position, ad hominem attacks to attempt to belittle and dehumanize your fellow interlocutor.

Won't fly Stonie guy. You only hurt yourself by attacking the messenger and not addressing the message.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-05-21   11:39:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court stated that it was the final arbiter of the Constitution of the United States. This power ultimately established the Supreme Court as a co-equal branch of the government.

The supreme court gave itself power. It didn't come from the consittution. Thats why you and pandora the witch can't find any delegated power to the supreme court. It had to be usurped. You are ignorant or an enemy of the constitution. And probably a commie too.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   11:42:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"The supreme court gave itself power. It didn't come from the consittution."

Damn bubba, learn to spell and capitalize. I mean, if you can't even understand the U.S. Constitution defines the role and prerogatives of the SCOTUS, and that the high court emanated from how that document defined it in it's role in creating the checks and balances of our government, at least spell, capitalize and punctuate as well as an eight grader.

"You are ignorant or an enemy of the constitution. And probably a commie too."

And what did I just get finished saying about ad hominem attacks? You don't listen, and you don't think things through.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-05-21   11:52:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And what did I just get finished saying about ad hominem attacks? You don't listen, and you don't think things through.

Ferret, you just don't understand do you.

Ad hominem attacks are perfectly ok if you are like Stone, i.e., you have God on your side and the voices in your head are guiding you.

If you or I do them howerer, we are being sinful.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   11:55:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Truth hurt?

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   12:07:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Truth hurt?

What? The truth that hate filled bigots tend to belive God is on their side? Read the story of John Brown some day.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   12:09:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What? The truth that hate filled bigots tend to belive God is on their side? Read the story of John Brown some day.

Your the asshole who started the personal attacks. saying hate filled constantly. Why dont you go fuck a monkey.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   12:10:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your the asshole who started the personal attacks. saying hate filled constantly. Why dont you go fuck a monkey.

Aw! The hate filled bigot tosses another little ball of vile hatred for Jesus!

I wasn't insulting you when I said that you were motivated by vile hatred. I was only noting that you typically act like you are acting here. It was a simple statement of fact.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   12:15:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I wasn't insulting you when I said that you were motivated by vile hatred. I was only noting that you typically act like you are acting here. It was a simple statement of fact.

Like I was pointing out the fact that wiccans are satanists and will burn in hell.

I hope they repent and accept christ.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   12:16:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Like I was pointing out the fact that wiccans are satanists and will burn in hell.

I hope they repent and accept christ.

No, like you calling people monkey fuckers and wishing for them to be burned at the stake.

But you know this don't you. That's why you are now spinning here.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   12:18:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If you don't believe in God then you must believe in evilution. They think its ok to fuck monkeys. In fact they that monkeys are our ancestors. Maybe I assumed to much thinking you believed in the religion of evilution.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   12:19:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If you don't believe in God then you must believe in evilution.

What about the group that vastly outnumbers you? The group that believes in both God and evolution?

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   12:21:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What about the group that vastly outnumbers you? The group that believes in both God and evolution?

Thats about as intelligent as saying they believe in a round square or carrots falling from the sky. They are not compatible. Goe clearly says he created life in 6 days. He didn't let it evolve over millions of year. Your problem is you have rejected your creators words.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   12:24:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Thats about as intelligent as saying they believe in a round square or carrots falling from the sky.

No answer huh?

Didn't think so.

You haven't done a very good job of thinking things through have you.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   12:26:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 166.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 166.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]