[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap 46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!! Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate... Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt. You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge Jewish Land Grab Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own. Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human' Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: The Nine Principles of the Goddess
Source: Sacred Texts
URL Source: http://www.sacred-texts.com/wmn/bog/bog02.htm
Published: May 20, 2006
Author: Unknown
Post Date: 2006-05-20 02:25:01 by Pandora
Keywords: None
Views: 21632
Comments: 271

Here is an interesting philosophy. I've always liked this:

The Nine Principles of the Goddess

1. I acknowledge that there is one Goddess in essence, Creatrix of all existences; Her forms are infinite, She manifests Herself in our love, and we are all Her lovers.

2. Treat all beings with reciprocity, for the Goddess lives in them as well as in us.

3. Tolerate other religions and do not compel others to join the circle of the Goddess: the Goddess will draw those to Her who are ready and hear Her call.

4. Worship Her by restoring balance to Her planet.

5. Eat mostly grains, vegetables and fruits, so that there will be enough food for all; when you eat thank the Goddess, the provider of all energy. It is not forbidden to eat animal flesh in moderation, but when you do so you must thank the animal that you eat as well.

6. In the circle of the Goddess create consensus while respecting diversity of opinion. On the path of the Goddess there are many paths.

7. In your home create a sacred space for the Goddess to please Her. Meditate on the Goddess three times a day, at rising, at noon and at sundown.

8. Sexuality is Her sacrament; enjoy this gift and bless those who you share it with love and affection. Remember that overcoming jealousy is the cause of cessation of the cycle of rebirth.

9. Announce the religion of the Goddess to the world through good works, honest words and selfless acts of beauty and love.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Then I guess your argument is about semantics and definitions. Someone might believe that all non-Christians are going to hell, but that does not make all non-Christians Satanists. Satanists are just one sect of the vast body of non-Christians.

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-05-21   13:29:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Then I guess your argument is about semantics and definitions. Someone might believe that all non-Christians are going to hell, but that does not make all non-Christians Satanists. Satanists are just one sect of the vast body of non-Christians.

Maybe i shouldn't call some of them satanists (wiccans deserve that title) but it is my belief that only people who accept christ will enter heaven. It is also my hope that everyone here will accept christ of their own free will.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   13:30:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I thought you were discussing the federal government as you mentioned the Supreme Court. I suppose a state could establish a religion and several did during the Colonial and Post-Revolutionary days, but I really don't think considering the strength of the Federal government and ascendancy of the feds over the states, that such a thing would be allowed now. But it could be argued.

I assume you're saying that states SHOULD establish an official religion, presumably Christianity? and which denomination would they pick?

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-05-21   13:31:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I thought you were discussing the federal government as you mentioned the Supreme Court. I suppose a state could establish a religion and several did during the Colonial and Post-Revolutionary days, but I really don't think considering the strength of the Federal government and ascendancy of the feds over the states, that such a thing would be allowed now. But it could be argued.

Pandora, some dead indian, and ferret mike, all think that the supreme court is the final arbitrator and that is constitutional. lol.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   13:32:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Well, practically speaking, in this day and age, they're right. The Federal govt has assumed ascendancy over the state govts so the Federal constitution usually supercedes the various state constititions. One can argue (on a variety of topics) as to whether that should be the case, but it is the reality now.

Personally I believe in vesting power in the states rather than the central govt, but one might argue that subservience to the federal constitution is one of the prices of belong to the republic. Of course, as we saw in the 1860s - no exit is allowed (which I also disagree with).

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-05-21   13:35:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

) as to whether that should be the case, but it is the reality now.

I'm perfectly aware that in reality the supreme court is exercising undelegated powers. All that group could spout is read marbury vs madison. My point was that that was a usurption of power. They all seemed to think that was the was the constitution was supposed to work.

I threw in a few curse words too and capitalized some stuff.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   13:40:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I agree it was a usurpation of power. However, if the states want to stay in the Union, that might be part of the price to pay (subservience to the Federal constition). I believe that states should be able to secede from the Union, however, which is the way they would be able to maintain their states rights. Otherwise, asserting states rights is kind of meaningless as the Feds will always try to usurp increasing levels of power.

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-05-21   13:45:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

All that group could spout is read marbury vs madison. My point was that that was a usurption of power. They all seemed to think that was the was the constitution was supposed to work.

No, you are lying to save face again.

But you know that.

Let's go over it for everyone else though.

You originally made an unqualified claim that states had the power to establish a state religion. Pandora kicked you in the balls by posting the relevant quote that showed they did not.

You then asked her to show you where the Supreme Court had the authority to make such a ruling. She did, she referenced Maybury vs Madison and told you it was explained there. It is - that is the controlling case. You refused to look at it or discuss it.

You then morphed your claim to say that if the world worked the way you would like it to work, your claim regarding state religions would then be true.

Pandora caught you on this and told you that you were now being silly. You were.

In this current post you try to dodge this other stuff further up on the thread. The problem you face is that this stuff is all there on the thread for the whole world to see. They can judge for themselves.

People would have a lot more respect for you if you had a shred of integrity. Lying for Jesus is just as ineffective as hating or cursing for Jesus.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:13:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You originally made an unqualified claim that states had the power to establish a state religion. Pandora kicked you in the balls by posting the relevant quote that showed they did not.

They do, and have had them. lol your so uninformed

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:20:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You then asked her to show you where the Supreme Court had the authority to make such a ruling. She did, she referenced Maybury vs Madison and told you it was explained there. It is - that is the controlling case. You refused to look at it or discuss it.

She showed me no where in the constitution for that power. You are a liar. I already know what marbury vs madison was. It is a usurption. So you should be to show me where they have that power delegated to them. Not when they gave themselves undelegated power in that power grab of a decision. YOu are not being honest. You still havent found where they get lawful power from. You are with the usurpers.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:23:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You then morphed your claim to say that if the world worked the way you would like it to work, your claim regarding state religions would then be true.

Show me where I said that liar. If it is there it shoud be real easy to do. But it is not. You are a proven liar.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:24:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In this current post you try to dodge this other stuff further up on the thread. The problem you face is that this stuff is all there on the thread for the whole world to see. They can judge for themselves.

I didn't dodge anything. They did decide for themselves, christine, jethro, methinkable all agree that it was a usurption.

The first amendment forbids CONGRESS....you are making stuff up to say it forbids governors. Taken with the 10th amendment(do you know what that is) the case is clear. States can have a state religion if they so desire.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:26:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

They do, and have had them. lol your so uninformed

No answer huh?

Didn't think so.

I guess the Supreme Court really does know what they are talking about - and your unsupported statement here is pure crap.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:29:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You then morphed your claim to say that if the world worked the way you would like it to work, your claim regarding state religions would then be true.

Show me where I said that liar.

See posts 63 and 78 above.

Buy you know that don't you.

But we might as well put them here for everyone else to see.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:30:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I didn't dodge anything. They did decide for themselves, christine, jethro, methinkable all agree that it was a usurption.

You are saying that if the law was the way you would like it to be, then you would be correct in your assertions.

OK.

Pandora was right. You are making a silly dodge to save face.

It is a lot different from your first unqualified claim that the States have a right to found a state religion isn't it?

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:32:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#63. To: Pandora (#60)

Use google and find a case called Marbury vs. Madison

Yes the first usurption. Just because it happened long ago and set a precedent doesn't mean it is the law.

Get back to the root.

The constitution. If a law conflicts with it, no matter what some guy in a robe( who isn't really a citizen according to THE REAL 13th AMENDMENT) tells you. Use your own mind...the words have meaning. Dont let some judge steal your rights.

FUCK THE GOVERNMENT

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:53:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #64. To: Ferret Mike (#62)

Don't yell at me with capital letters. Keep it civil. Making wrong statements louder simply does not make them right.

Caps is to highlight it. It is not yelling. That is some gay aol saying.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:53:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #65. To: A K A Stone (#57)

Christ said he would come back to bring a sword

Stone, did you ever consider founding a "Hate for Jesus" ministry?

You and all the other hate filled, bigoted religions kooks could sit around and tell each other how God wanted you to torure heritics.

It would be a big hit in fundie circles.

Anonymous Dead Indian posted on 2006-05-21 10:55:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #66. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#61)

So instead of allowing Him to do as He said He would, you have decided to do it for Him?

So tell me, how many souls have you won for our Lord with your tactics?

God said to preach the whole word...not some sugar coating of the word like saying the garden of eden is fiction. Guess what Hell and witches are in the Bible. Guess what God said they are going to hell. If you want to help someone you would inform them of it instead of letting them go to the dark side. Take a stand. Jesus said those who were luke warm would be spit out of his mouth. Me im red hot.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:55:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #67. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#65)

You and all the other hate filled, bigoted religions kooks could sit around and tell each other how God wanted you to torure heritics.

It would be a big hit in fundie circles.

You are misrepresenting what I said. Where did I say to torture anyone. that is what Bush is for not me.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:56:16 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #68. To: Pandora (#60)

"Use google and find a case called Marbury vs. Madison. This will explain it to you. I don't have time to explain high school civics here."

This guy is too much. He is assuming that the Constitution was adopted to make worse the problems maintaining the political and social cohesion of this nation the Articles of Confederation were causing in the several states.

I doubt of he has the tools to understand how case law - Stare Decisis - works; never mind understand the decision you cite - Marbury vs. Madison - and why it is a cornerstone decision of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Nice try though.

Ferret Mike posted on 2006-05-21 10:56:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #69. To: Ferret Mike (#68)

I doubt of he has the tools to understand how case law

You are such an ass.

Show me in the constitution where it says law is determined by who has the best lawyer and how some case comes out. NOW COME ON THAT IS ASSININE.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:58:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #70. To: Ferret Mike (#68)

So you think case law trumps the constitution. Of commie.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 10:59:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #71. To: A K A Stone (#66)

Take a stand. Jesus said those who were luke warm would be spit out of his mouth. Me im red hot.

You can be red hot AND dead wrong at the same time - but I think deep down you know this.

How many souls have you won for Christ?

CAPPSMADNESS posted on 2006-05-21 11:00:48 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #72. To: A K A Stone (#67)

Where did I say to torture anyone. that is what Bush is for not me.

On this thread you seemed to delight in someone being burned at the stake. I would have to comb through threads for other instances and I don't want to waste my time doing that.

But how can you be a rapture monkey and not want to hurt those who don't agree with your silly, narrow view? Doesn't this come with the territory? How does the Taliban handle disagreement? How would your theocracy handle it? How did Cotton Mather handle it?

Anonymous Dead Indian posted on 2006-05-21 11:00:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #73. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#71)

You can be red hot AND dead wrong at the same time - but I think deep down you know this.

How many souls have you won for Christ?

Yes you can be red hot and wrong....

I don't know how many souls I won. I thought faith came by hearing the word.

How many have you won?

How many have you lead astray by claiming Genesis is not true?

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 11:02:21 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #74. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#72)

"How did Cotton Mather handle it?"

Heh, he likely believes Cotton Mather is a device invented by Eli Whitney to efficiently and quickly remove seeds from fresh picked cotton, and that the cotton gin was a judge who hung people who denied they were witches in Salem, Massachusetts. ;-)

Ferret Mike posted on 2006-05-21 11:04:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #75. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#72)

On this thread you seemed to delight in someone being burned at the stake. I would have to comb through threads for other instances and I don't want to waste my time doing that.

But how can you be a rapture monkey and not want to hurt those who don't agree with your silly, narrow view? Doesn't this come with the territory? How does the Taliban handle disagreement? How would your theocracy handle it? How did Cotton Mather handle it?

I said that in times past some of these witches would have been burnt at the stake. That is a fact it happened, i neither condemed or encouraged it, i just stated a fact.

Rapture monkey? I don't believe in a rapture.

What people do is mix the "rapture" in with the second coming.

Make two doctrines out of one.

I believe in the second coming.

I wouldn't believe to much propaganda against the Taliban. 911 was an inside job.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 11:04:58 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #76. To: Ferret Mike (#74)

Why do you hate Jesus? He gave his life freely so you could have life.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 11:06:03 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #77. To: zipporah (#0)

Do you think wiccans have their root in satanism?

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone posted on 2006-05-21 11:06:47 ET Reply Trace Private Reply #78. To: A K A Stone (#63)

The constitution. If a law conflicts with it, no matter what some guy in a robe( who isn't really a citizen according to THE REAL 13th AMENDMENT) tells you. Use your own mind...the words have meaning. Dont let some judge steal your rights.

FUCK THE GOVERNMENT

I told you that the US Contstitution, as it has been understood by the US Supreme Court for over a century, does not allow the states to set up a state religion. In fact, it never allowed this. I presented both the case where this interpretation is made and the case that allows the Supreme Court to make this interpretation.

You are now arguing that if the United States Government went away, the States could then set up a state religion.

Do you realize how silly you sound when you back track this way?

Pandora posted on 2006-05-21 11:07:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:32:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are saying that if the law was the way you would like it to be, then you would be correct in your assertions.

OK.

The constitution is the law. Didn't you know that.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:34:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes the first usurption. Just because it happened long ago and set a precedent doesn't mean it is the law.

Yup.

If the world was the way you wanted it to be, you would be correct here.

Otherwise it looks like Pandora knows what she is talking about and she is correct.

Given that we must deal with reality as it is, and not as you would prefer it to be, I will go with Pandora.

Incidentally, throwing a tantrum to obscure your error just makes you look like a ninney.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:36:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I guess the Supreme Court really does know what they are talking about - and your unsupported statement here is pure crap.

In other words you can't find the power given to the supreme court by the states.

In other words you can't find it in the constitution. So you just take the usurpers word for it. Find it in the constitution or it is not valid. You really aren't that bright are you.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:37:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The constitution is the law. Didn't you know that.

So is the rest of the body of law. Didn't you know that?

Read Maybury vs Madison, or take civics 101 and it will be explained to you.

You can't pick and chose which laws you like and you can't operate in the fatasy world in your head where everything is the way you would like it to be.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:38:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In other words you can't find the power given to the supreme court by the states.

Sure I can. And so can you. We told you where to look.

You are now doing is begging the question to obfuscate your error. It is a common tactic of loons when they get their asses kicked.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:39:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yup.

If the world was the way you wanted it to be, you would be correct here.

Otherwise it looks like Pandora knows what she is talking about and she is correct.

Given that we must deal with reality as it is, and not as you would prefer it to be, I will go with Pandora.

Incidentally, throwing a tantrum to obscure your error just makes you look like a ninney.

I know in reality the supremes are usurpers and have the REAL power right now to decide cases. I never argued that. Im just saying that it isn't really the law as that power was never granted them under the constitution. And that if there is any justice ALL of those decisions that they made would be struck down.

Also do you know anything about the real (missing) 13th amendment>?

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:39:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The constitution is the law. Didn't you know that.

So is the rest of the body of law. Didn't you know that?

actually if the congress enacts a law and it isn't constitutionally based it isn't really a law and we have no obligation to follow it.

Ever heard of color of law......why do they have that term if everything congress passes is the law.

You need to throw out all the garbage the government propaganda schools "taught" (more like brainwahed) you into thinking.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:41:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I know in reality the supremes are usurpers and have the REAL power right now to decide cases. I never argued that. Im just saying that it isn't really the law as that power was never granted them under the constitution. And that if there is any justice ALL of those decisions that they made would be struck down.

What you keep saying over, and over, and over, and over is that if the world was they way you wanted it to be, then you would be right.

Yawn.

As Pandora pointed out to you, that is a silly position.

I would go one further and say you are now being idiotic.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:42:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Sure I can. And so can you. We told you where to look.

From the supreme law of the land. You seem incabable of grasping a very simple constititional concept. If it violates the constitution it isn't a law. The lawbreakers in marbury vs madison dont have the power to replace the constitution. Only because idiots like you went along with it did it take root. You are part of the problem and not the solution.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:43:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

actually if the congress enacts a law and it isn't constitutionally based it isn't really a law and we have no obligation to follow it.

Ever heard of color of law......why do they have that term if everything congress passes is the law.

OK, I give.

If the world was the way it exists in your bigoted little head, then you would be correct.

Otherwise, when we are dealing with reality, when we are dealing with the way things really are, you are dead wrong. You have to relevant quotes on the thread above to prove this to yourself.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:44:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You have proven yourself stupid (not ignorant) several times. When you get your GED come back and debate with the big boys.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

From the supreme law of the land. You seem incabable of grasping a very simple constititional concept. If it violates the constitution it isn't a law.

Stone, you are making a mornonic argument that your interpretation of the Constitution differs from that of the Supreme Court.

Ok, fine. If the world was the way it exists in your bigoted little head, you would be correct.

Otherwise - in the real world - they are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter and you are some silly dick on the internet.

But go ahead and tell us how you would like things to be.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:46:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

From the supreme law of the land.

Show me a law that doesn't have to be interpreted and I will show you a country without courts.

It only exists in your bigoted little mind.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

actually if the congress enacts a law and it isn't constitutionally based it isn't really a law and we have no obligation to follow it.

And who decides this loon?

Maybe the Supreme Court? I mean, that is the articulated purpose of this court.

Thank you for making my point.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:52:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Maybe the Supreme Court? I mean, that is the articulated purpose of this court.

Show me the constitutional authority. You can't because it isn't there you federal propagandist.

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   14:53:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Show me the constitutional authority. You can't because it isn't there you federal propagandist.

We did. Many, many, many, many times on this thread.

You refused to look.

What you are doing is begging the question to obfuscate your error and save face.

Anonymous Dead Indian  posted on  2006-05-21   14:59:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

LIAR LIAR YOUR PANTS ARE ON FIRE. YOU SHOW ME THE USURPTION. YOU CANT SHOW ONE QUOTE FROM THE CONSTITUTION. YOU ENEMY OF THE CONSTITUTION YOU!!!

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-05-21   15:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The concept of a goddess is a satanist witch philisophy.

No it's not.

Yes it is Pandora. There is only one way to heaven and it is through Jesus the Son of God. There is only one alternative to Jesus, Satan and everlasting hell, there is no other alternative period, as much as you or anyone else wants there to be one, there isn't.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-05-24   3:14:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No its not a satanist cult

If it is not in your opinion , then what would you say it is?

Any religion that does not acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God and savior of the world is a religion that has the spirit of anti-Christ. Any religion that has the spirit of anti-Christ is a religion that has its roots with the father of all lies, which is Satan.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-05-24   3:29:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

First off, Wiccans are not satanists. Those are two different things entirely. I've met a lot of Wiccans, and they're generally very nice people.

This is just not true; you are being deceived by the outward appearance of "nice" people. BTW, you can be one of the nicest individuals in the whole world and still go to hell, rejecting Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior is the unforgivable sin, and all who do it will go to hell.

Satan is the one who started the big lie that he doesn't exist, those that believe that lie are already his followers whether they know it or not.

God is always good!
"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02] More and more of our imports come from overseas. - George W. Bush

RickyJ  posted on  2006-05-24   3:40:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If it is not in your opinion , then what would you say it is?

Any religion that does not acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God and savior of the world is a religion that has the spirit of anti-Christ. Any religion that has the spirit of anti-Christ is a religion that has its roots with the father of all lies, which is Satan.

The way he depicted it was that they were true satanists.. and the issue here wasnt religious discussion whatsoever it was to disrupt.. I agree with the scripture.. if you're not for me you're against me..

Zipporah  posted on  2006-05-24   5:23:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I can't believe how this thread has grown! I think last I saw it was up to around 80 something posts.

Diana  posted on  2006-05-24   5:30:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I can't believe how this thread has grown! I think last I saw it was up to around 80 something posts.

Funny how sock puppets do manage to catch people's attention..

Zipporah  posted on  2006-05-24   5:35:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"YOU WILL ACCEPT ME AND LOVE ME, MAKE ME NUMBER ONE IN YOUR LIFE OR ELSE I WILL THROW YOU DOWN INTO HELL FOR ETERNITY TO BE TORTURED FOREVER AND EVER!!"

What a way to win a person over. Nice.

Oops, I forgot, nice doesn't mean much to radicals.

Diana  posted on  2006-05-24   6:00:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (250 - 271) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]