See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: they are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter
Source:
Anonymous Dead Indian
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/reada ... rtNum=26558&SC=228&EC=267#C228
Published: May 21, 2006
Author: Anonymous Dead Indian
Post Date: 2006-05-21 14:52:22 by A K A Stone
Keywords: stupid statement, doesn, ignorance is bliss
Views: 227
Comments: 31
they are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter What an incredible ignorant statement. This federal propagandist would have us believe that the supreme court is the dictators and we must obey and disregard the constitution.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
The dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law. They get to decide everything according to the propagandist posting this nonsense.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
I nominate this for stupidest quote of the year.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Link Mr. kook desperately trying to construct a strawman? And be sure the highlight the "foreign law" part.
You said it. Can't you stand by your drivel.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
You said it. Can't you stand by your drivel. Link Mr. ---- DISHONEST -- kook desperately trying to construct a strawman?
And don't forget to prove up the part about "foreign law".
Did you or did you not say that about the supreme court? Are you backpedling now?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
You said the supremes are unchallengeable. So they are a law unto themselves. You admitted you dont think they have to obey the constitution. They are in fact using foreign law. You still support them because marbury said they are the say so. So in reality that is what you support.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
You said I said it. Let's see the link --- kook. It should be no problem if you are being honest. Let's see if you can twist an out of context statement enough to save your ass here.
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=26558&SC=228&EC=267#C228
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Link Kook? I think you are a liar.
Thats what they call us who knows wtc was an inside job.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=26558&SC=228&EC=267#C228 That doesn't say what you said I said --- kook. But you knew that when you posted it.
To your face I am calling you a dishonest, lying kook. You are a liar. Post the link where I said this and prove me wrong -- kook.
Your the on lying. they are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter and you are some silly dick on the internet. But go ahead and tell us how you would like things to be. Anonymous Dead Indian posted on 2006-05-21 14:46:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
C'mon Stone. Is it time to lie and spin for Jesus, or can you post the quote where I said this? Liar.
I said that part. That is the reality of your position when you say they are unchallengeable. What are we supposed to go back and only be able to challenge parts of their decisions that are based on foreign law. What does that imaginary process involve.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
You are spinning like a top now. Tell one person in authority who seriously challenges the Supreme Court's right to decide Supreme Court cases? Here is what you actually said when cooking up your strawman: You said the supremes are unchallengeable. So they are a law unto themselves. You admitted you dont think they have to obey the constitution. Where did I say this kook? Where did I say they were utterly unchallengable? Where did I say that they were a law unto themselves? Where did I say they were above the Constitution?
Oh, and Stone, you still haven't explained the "foreign law" part of your strawman. Better start spinning or else come up with a quote.
You didn't say foreign law. I never said you did. I was saying that is the logical conclusion of your can't challenge the supreme courts decisions. If you can't challenge them then they can use foreign law can't they. Unchallengeable you said. That means can't challenge for any reason. that's wht UN means. Traitor
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
From your first post on this thread --- LIAR. "The dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law."
Stone, go get the link where I said "even when they use foreign law" and post it here. Or else have the balls to admit that you are caught in a lie.
Bald faced liar. Lying for Jesus are we?
Stone, with this simple demonstration that you are in fact a bald faced liar, I will leave you for a while. It is a nice day and I think I will go work outside. The point I am taking with me is that you will lie to disparage another person's character in an effort to save yourself from admitting you were wrong on a silly internet thread. You are a person seriously lacking in character and morals.
Why do you find it necessary, to leave YOUR forum and start a flame war here? It is kind of like being invited to someone's home and then walking in and taking a large dump on their living room carpet - only to retreat to your nice clean home. I think you are being rude to your hosts.
This is more than simply my opionion. There is proof of this right here on this thread.
Ya think it's time???
Running things are you huh?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
There is no lie. I didn't put your part it quotes as I should have. The first sentence is what you said. Followed by my opinions. The point is you said "hey are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter" So you are saying the supreme court has unchallenged power to decide cases. That is the point you were making. I say no the constitution is superior to the supreme court and if the supreme court makes a decision that conflicts with the constitution that it is really not a law. Ok back to the foreing law dispute. I said the logical conclusion to your opinion is that the supreme court could use foreign law to make its decisions. They are using foreign law to make decisions. Are those decisions binding on us? Do you think we should follow them? What if they didn't tell us that they were using foreing law to make the decisions, would the decisions then be binding because they didn't tell us? You see when you give the supremes unquestionability you destroy the constitution. You get a group of men who are making up the law as they go along, instead of the PLAIN reading of the text of the constitution.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
Knock it off...
So you are running things? Seriously.
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
#2. To: All (#0)
#3. To: A K A Stone (#1)
The dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law. They get to decide everything according to the propagandist posting this nonsense.
#4. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#3)
Link Mr. kook desperately trying to construct a strawman?
#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)
Link Mr. kook desperately trying to construct a strawman?
#6. To: A K A Stone (#4)
#7. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#5)
#8. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#6)
#9. To: A K A Stone (#7)
Did you or did you not say that about the supreme court? Are you backpedling now?
#10. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#9)
#11. To: A K A Stone (#8)
You said the supremes are unchallengeable. So they are a law unto themselves.
#12. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#11)
Link Kook?
#13. To: A K A Stone (#10)
To: Anonymous Dead Indian
#14. To: A K A Stone (#8)
You said the supremes are unchallengeable. So they are a law unto themselves. You admitted you dont think they have to obey the constitution.
#15. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#14)
#16. To: A K A Stone (#8)
You said the supremes are unchallengeable. So they are a law unto themselves. You admitted you dont think they have to obey the constitution.
#17. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#16)
o they are a law unto themselves. You admitted you dont think they have to obey the constitution.
#18. To: A K A Stone (#15)
they are the Supreme Court who has the unchallenged power to decide the matter and you are some silly dick on the internet.
#19. To: Stone (#18)
#20. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#19)
Oh, and Stone, you still haven't explained the "foreign law" part of your strawman. Better start spinning or else come up with a quote.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#20)
You didn't say foreign law. I never said you did.
#22. To: All (#21)
The dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law."
#23. To: A K A Stone (#20)
The dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law."
#24. To: A K A Stone (#20)
he dead indian would have us obey the supremes, even when they use foreign law."
#25. To: A K A Stone, zipporah, christine (#0)
#26. To: A K A Stone (#20)
You are a person seriously lacking in character and morals.
#27. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#25)
#28. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#25)
Why do you find it necessary, to leave YOUR forum and start a flame war here?
#29. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#24)
Stone, with this simple demonstration that you are in fact a bald faced liar, I will leave you for a while.
#30. To: A K A Stone (#28)
#31. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#30)
Knock it off...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest