Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Jewish Supremacist Gloats Over Demise And Replacement Of White Christian America
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://christiansfortruth.com/jewi ... nt-of-white-christian-america/
Published: Oct 15, 2022
Author: CFT Team
Post Date: 2022-10-15 19:59:56 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 541
Comments: 11

(Washington Post) Jennifer Rubin — a Jewish supremacist and ultra- Zionist apologist — wrote a recent op-ed piece for the Washington Post gloating and salivating over the Jewish-orchestrated browning of America — while demonizing White Christians comprising America’s heartland who dare to resist their replacement:

The 2020 Census shows that while Whites remain the largest ethnicity group in the United States, the demographic decreased by 8.6 percent over the past decade. Those identifying as multiracial, by contrast, grew by a stunning 276 percent. Hispanic, Black and Asian American populations all grew at a rapid rate, too. Now, the country is nearly 19 percent Hispanic, 12 percent Black and 6 percent Asian American.

The country grew at a slower pace than in any decade since the Depression. It is also aging. Nearly all the growth took place in urban centers (up nearly 9 percent) as rural populations shrank. The Hill reports: “Fewer than half of the 3,143 counties in the United States added population over the last decade, the new census data shows. The share of Americans who live in nonmetropolitan rural areas dropped by 2.8 percentage points, the Bureau said Thursday.”

The results speak to a truism that millions of Republicans would like to ignore: America is never static. It is — and has always been — in a state of flux, whether it comes to race, religious affiliation (or lack thereof), the divide between native-born and immigrant, or the geographic spread of the population (e.g., the Great Migration of Blacks from the South in the early 20th century or the rise of the Sun Belt population over the last few decades). Indeed, that is the essence of America — a country not defined by racial or religious identity.

That reality has, of course, freaked out a significant share of White Christians who do not see “their America” as predominate. It was never “theirs” to begin with, and the assumption that something is amiss if White Christians are not in charge is the essence of white supremacy and Christian nationalism. It is also fundamentally un-American; our country is defined, as President Biden rightly says, by an “idea.”

It is easy, then, to understand why a political party based increasingly on its appeal to White Christians has adopted so many anti-American traits. The sanctity of elections has given way to a sentiment that violence is sometimes necessary (for Whites to retain power). The decline in their numbers has led to worship of totalitarian thugs around the world and disdain for a free society. The desperation for a make- believe world of yesteryear has led tens of millions down the rabbit hole of right-wing media propaganda, where their worst fears and darkest impulses are amplified.

Less remarked upon, but equally important, is that the growth of urban areas (generally more productive, more tolerant and more diverse) leaves rural Whites increasingly at odds with the national ethos. The latter are also poorer, sicker, less educated and have shorter life-spans than their metropolitan counterparts.

A rational, pro-democracy party would recognize it needs a broader base of support and move to adjust its policies to appeal to a more diverse, more secular and more urban America. That’s not the GOP game plan.

The GOP is so dependent on the right-wing media generator of White angst and resentment, and so fearful they will lose their grip among Whites, that they have chosen instead to try to hold back the demographic and cultural tide washing over them. They resort to voter suppression, assault objective reality, disdain majority rule and weaponize apolitical institutions, such as the courts or the Justice Department. Moreover, given their White, wealthy donor base, they can offer only rhetorical populism while pursuing plutocratic economic policies (going so far as to refuse to increase funding for the Internal Revenue Service to enforce tax laws).

There is no single solution to solve the growing urban-rural divide. However, unless and until Americans in rural areas demand responsible governance, embrace the true “idea” of America and reject the temptation of racism and authoritarianism, little will change.

In the meantime, urban Americans, who constitute a greater share of the population than ever before, will lose patience with anti-democratic techniques (e.g., the filibuster, voter suppression) designed to give rural Whites disproportionate power. Demography may not be destiny, but it brings the weaknesses of American democracy into focus.

While Jennifer Rubin isn’t bashing White Christian America, she is fomenting wars in the Middle East to use the American military as proxy warriors to protect her beloved ethno-state of Israel.

Like many Jewish supremacists, Rubin believes that the Jewish people have a right to their own country — and resist the “browning” of Israel, lest it be overrun by Muslims who “want to replace” the Jews and “wipe Israel off the map” — while admitting they want to wipe Gaza off the map.

All extreme violence against the surrounding Arab population is justified in order to maintain the small Jewish minorities precarious position in Israel — while demonizing White American’s for defending their constitutional rights to bear arms and defend themselves against enemies foreign and domestic.

Yet when it comes to America, Jews falsely claim this country was never a White Christian nation, founded by White Christians for their own posterity, despite what the Founding Fathers explicitly stated.

Jewish supremacists have literally rewritten American history, demonizing the Founding Fathers as racist, genocidal bigots — while extolling the virtues of the ignorant Third World flotsam and jetsam concentrated in urban slums — Jewish strongholds — simply because the color of their skin.

White rural Americans have always been the literal the backbone of America — they literally feed us and do all the heavy lifting — and they fight our wars in the name of Jewish supremacists like Rubin, who turn around and mock them for being “uneducated” and daring to defend their honest, simple ways of life.

If Jews like Rubin truly wanted to decrease “antisemitism” — and they clearly do not — they wouldn’t write such hypocritical, hateful, and inflammatory screeds like this — but they can’t help themselves — they are inherent destroyers by their own admission:

“We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.”

Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, 1924 If Jews are wondering what gave rise to a “populist” like Adolf Hitler, it is this kind of persistent demonizing of the native founders of White Christian nations in which they dwell as outsiders by their own choosing — a choice of freedom of association they deny White Christians:

“[Russian Ashkenazi Jews] never seem for an instant to lose the consciousness that they are a race apart. It is in their walk, their sidelong glance, in the carriage of their sloping shoulders, in the curious gesture of the uplifted palm. “

–Harold Frederick, The New Exodus: Israel in Russia [London, 1892], 79- 80); quoted in Lindemann, A. S. The Jew Accused: Three Anti-Semitic Affairs (Dreyfus, Beilis, Frank) 1894–1915. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1991, p. 129

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#2. To: Ada (#0)

"COMMENT

Yet another supremacist Jew reminds of something – how many times must we be reminded we(the so-called Allies), we’re on the wrong side in WW2. General Patton realized it in 1945, went public and paid with his life. Just look at the clown world we have now. All the worst things were brought about increasingly by Jews in positions of power."

Did you catch the article a little while back about the Patton letter at auction?

Letter By General George Patton In Which He Refers To Jews As ‘Sub-Human’ Goes Up For Auction

September 15, 2022

christiansfortruth.com/le...uman-goes-up-for-auction/

www.thejc.com/news/world/...ne-4WZX5S5VW0NrqsYUUlV3pp

www.sothebys.com/en/buy/a...ark-and-disturbing-letter

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-10-15   22:05:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, Ada (#2)

Thank you both.

Lod  posted on  2022-10-15   22:21:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#3)

Speaking for myself, you're welcome. Ada always posts good stuff.

And thank you to White Rural Americans:

White rural Americans have always been the literal the backbone of America — they literally feed us and do all the heavy lifting — and they fight our wars in the name of Jewish supremacists like Rubin, who turn around and mock them for being “uneducated” and daring to defend their honest, simple ways of life.

If Jews like Rubin truly wanted to decrease “antisemitism” — and they clearly do not — they wouldn’t write such hypocritical, hateful, and inflammatory screeds like this — but they can’t help themselves — they are inherent destroyers by their own admission:

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-10-16   11:51:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#8. To: Ada (#4)

White rural Americans have always been the literal the backbone of America — they literally feed us and do all the heavy lifting — and they fight our wars in the name of Jewish supremacists like Rubin, who turn around and mock them for being “uneducated” and daring to defend their honest, simple ways of life.

If Jews like Rubin truly wanted to decrease “antisemitism” — and they clearly do not — they wouldn’t write such hypocritical, hateful, and inflammatory screeds like this — but they can’t help themselves — they are inherent destroyers by their own admission:

Posted: October 14, 2022

Nothing But Welfare Queens: American Aid to Zelensky and Tsai Ing-wen

Libertarian Institute – by Patrick Macfarlane

As it pertains to the American public, Ukraine’s response to the Russian invasion can be summed up with two words: “Zelensky demands.”

To date, Washington elites and their politicians have been happy to provide—at public expense—lining their own pockets in the process.

As of this writing, U.S. aid for Ukraine has reached approximately $67.5 billion, a figure greater than Russia’s entire 2021 military budget. According to the State Department, this support includes $15.2 billion in direct military assistance. The support comes although 60-70% of lethal aid never reaches the front lines, according to a now-redacted CBS interview with on-the-ground activists.

Not only is the American taxpayer supporting much of the Ukrainian military, it is also supporting the Ukrainian government. The same working class Americans who were deemed “nonessential” in 2020—who saw their businesses shuttered and burned down—now have to pay entitlement programs both at home and in Ukraine. As of September 30, 2022, the U.S. has provided $13 billion in “direct budget support,” which is ostensibly used;

…to pay government salaries, meet pension obligations, maintain hospitals and schools, and protect critical infrastructure[,] support continuity operations at the national, regional, and local levels, support for [sic] the health sector, agricultural production, civil society, [and enable] programs to hold Russia and its forces accountable for their actions in Ukraine.

Although American taxpayers have already matched Russia’s 2021 military budget, Ukrainian president Vlodomyr Zelensky only demands more. During a Tuesday phone call, President Biden reviewed Washington’s latest $625 million dole to Zelensky. It includes, inter alia, 4 additional High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), 16 155mm Howitzers, 75,000 155 mm artillery rounds, 500 precision-guided 155mm artillery rounds, 16 105mm Howitzers, 30,000 120 mm mortar rounds, and 200 MaxxPro Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles.

This latest boon notwithstanding, in the same phone call, Zelensky urged Biden to provide Ukraine with air defense systems that would be used to shoot down Russian planes...."

fromthetrenchesworldrepor...en/307491#comment-2308618

And Putin is threatening to nuke America...and this benefits "white Rural Christian America" how??

It doesn't. It's just one example of their ODIOUS DEBT, for which Americans need to "rise and thresh and take back their ill-gotten gain" (Micah 4:13).

Odious Debt

There is an established legal principle that people should not have to repay their government's debt to the extent that it is incurred to launch aggressive wars or to oppress the people.

These "odious debts" are considered to be the personal debts of the tyrants who incurred them, rather than the country's debt.

Wikipedia gives a good overview of the principle:

In international law, odious debt is a legal theory which holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, such as wars of aggression, should not be enforceable. Such debts are thus considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion.

The doctrine was formalized in a 1927 treatise by Alexander Nahum Sack, a Russian émigré legal theorist, based upon 19th Century precedents including Mexico's repudiation of debts incurred by Emperor Maximilian's regime, and the denial by the United States of Cuban liability for debts incurred by the Spanish colonial regime. According to Sack:

When a despotic regime contracts a debt, not for the needs or in the interests of the state, but rather to strengthen itself, to suppress a popular insurrection, etc, this debt is odious for the people of the entire state. This debt does not bind the nation; it is a debt of the regime, a personal debt contracted by the ruler, and consequently it falls with the demise of the regime. The reason why these odious debts cannot attach to the territory of the state is that they do not fulfil one of the conditions determining the lawfulness of State debts, namely that State debts must be incurred, and the proceeds used, for the needs and in the interests of the State. Odious debts, contracted and utilised for purposes which, to the lenders' knowledge, are contrary to the needs and the interests of the nation, are not binding on the nation - when it succeeds in overthrowing the government that contracted them - unless the debt is within the limits of real advantages that these debts might have afforded. The lenders have committed a hostile act against the people, they cannot expect a nation which has freed itself of a despotic regime to assume these odious debts, which are the personal debts of the ruler...."

thirdworldtraveler.com/Third_World/Odious_Debt.html

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-10-16 15:15:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest