[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Religion See other Religion Articles Title: WHY IS A MARRIED JESUS SO THREATENING TO THE CHURCH? WHY IS A MARRIED JESUS SO THREATENING TO THE CHURCH? Date: Thursday, 18 May 2006, 4:25 p.m. Is it because the Church has been exposed in a huge two thousand year long cover-up? Was Jesus not virginal and celibate after all? He called himself the "son of man", emphasizing his human side. His followers called him "Rabbi", and rabbis were married men. With families. (Infertility was a valid reason for divorce among the Jews in Jesus' time. It still is, among Muslims whose traditions are very similar.) So what, pray tell, is so shocking about Jesus being a married man? Does it really take away from his "divinity"? (Only for the brainwashed, surely.) Jesus' divinity vs humanity was a huge bone of contention among the earliest Christians who insisted that it had to be "either or". Instead of BOTH. In the early years of Christianity when few could read and ignorance was even more rampant than now (!) much blood was shed over this issue. But the implications of Jesus having a family go much deeper.... gigi's post below suggests much older, deeper and darker Church secrets. From my own studies I have some sense of what those might be. The following thoughts are JMO---from three decades of studying this topic. And from investigative traveling in the south of France and in the MidEast. ******************************* Ever since I read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" in l982 I began to ponder why the Church was so desperate to suppress the idea of Jesus having progeny. The following ideas came to mind: (A) Any direct bloodline descendants of Jesus would be the natural spiritual leaders of the Church-not the elected popes and cardinals. Thus the heirarchy and entire Roman political power structure of the Church would be threatened. Forever and ever. (B) Some of the early Church leaders must have recognized that Jesus' extraordinary powers (healing, psychic abilities, "miracles", etc.) were derived from (what many believe is) extraterrestrial/human hybrid ancestry. The "gods" were known to have such superhuman skills. Consider that the "angel" Gabriel announced to Mary that she would conceive by the Holy Spirit. Is it so hard to imagine that "God" could arrange a "divine" pregnancy such as we saw with the Nefilim (the "gods" in Genesis 4), with Abraham's disbelieving Sarah, and in recent times with UFO abductees? Mankind has long viewed ET's as "divine" gods due to their advanced powers. A heavily suppressed but age-old truth is that our planet has been periodically and continually seeded by extraterrestrials for many millenia. The bees frequently found in esoteric and Church d33;cor are indications of the divine "flying ones"...for those who Know. The symbolism of the "tower" also refers to early ET technology. "Magdala" means TOWER. (C) A sacred bloodline with extraordinary spiritual powers would have to be eradicated if the politics of the early Roman Church were to successfully dominate the "civilized" world. Ancient sacred mysteries and knowledge were suppressed or declared heresy. For example, slaves and ordinary people could not be allowed to know the basic truth of reincarnation (karmic justice and continuous life is too hopeful). Most (not all) references to it were apparently edited out of the canonical scriptures. Its champion, the cleric Origen, was declared "anathema" and expelled by the Council of Nicea (325 CE) where scriptures were approved (canon) or censored (apocrypha/heresy). So the pogroms began.... Those who insist that the Bible was written by men have a strong argument if they are referring to the editing and censoring done at Nicea. :<)) (D) The once powerful Knights Templar are believed to have guarded the holy grail, now finally understood as the holy bloodline itself. During the first millenium CE the sacred bloodline became the French royal "Merovingian" line which the Church tried to eradicate-unsuccessfuly. The royal houses of Europe all wanted to interbreed with this line, and many did so. These facts must have been known to Pope Clement (who showed NO "clemency"!) when he, collaborating with the French king in 1307, ordered the mass arrest, trials, tortures and executions of the Templars. At that point the majority of the Templars fled and dispersed by land and sea to many countries, and went "underground". Thence they have operated in the shadows, presumably still protecting the holy grail/bloodline. From them are descended the Freemasons who were later infiltrated by the Illuminati (founded only in May 1776 by Weisskopf of Bavaria.) (E) The "Priory of Sion" may (or may not) be a modern invention serving as a "red herring" (false lead) to protect the identity of the actual bloodline (holy grail). There are now certainly millions who knowingly--and unknowingly--carry the sacred bloodline of Jesus and Mary from their daughter "Sarah" (meaning "royal"). People refer to the "children" of Jesus and Mary, but I am not aware of others besides Sarah whose existence is heavily documented in French legends, churches, and folklore. If any reader knows anything about siblings of Sarah, I would like to know references, sources, etc. (Thank you!) A Merovingian direct descendant, Princess Diana was evidently chosen to help to empower the failing British monarchy with her sacred-blooded sons. We may remember that her older sister SARAH (!) was the Windsors' first choice, but was probably not a virgin, a royal requirement. So the job fell to young Diana. The goddess of the hunt, Diana gave the Windsors a "run for their money"--and two holy-blooded heirs. Pierre Plantard, the current head of the Priory of Sion has now sworn that he invented the Priory in the l950's. The Church and TV producers have swallowed his story whole, since it suits their Church agenda of discrediting the idea of a bloodline. Others insist that the Priory was founded in l099 by the Knights Templar as a secret organization to document the sacred bloodline. (F) Imagine: if millions now carry the bloodline of Jesus, might this not be one aspect of the promised "Second Coming?" A "Second Coming" not controlled by any organized religion, but fed as the universal "Christ Consciousness" through humanity itself! :<)) ******************* So whether or not you choose to see "The DaVinci Code" film. do consider the provocative questions it raises. And look into the rapidly expanding source material like "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (1982-in paperback) and discern the truth for yourself. Truth now prevails increasingly. Suppression, no matter how "loud" is no longer possible in this new millenium of "Truthtime". Blessings and enLightenment to all~~ Namaskar
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#5. To: Mind_Virus, it'salmosttoolate, All (#0)
Boy Abe Foxman sure was pissed over Mel Gibson's Jesus movie, where he said all these Christians would go around lynching Jews all over the world over it. Of course that never happened. However, Foxman and his cohorts feel they must seek revenge, and I think all this DiVinci Code crap and it's implications is just that. I notice Drudge has been putting up tons of articles about it, like it's the most important movie of all time.
However, Foxman and his cohorts feel they must seek revenge, and I think all this DiVinci Code crap and it's implications is just that. I notice Drudge has been putting up tons of articles about it, like it's the most important movie of all time. Good analysis, I agree. I've been speaking about this new movie like it's another Indiana Jones movie, which IMO that's how accurate it is. To imply that a novel/movie can suddenly reveal some deep dark secret of 2,000 years of Christendom is ludicrous. Fact is, the Talmud has all kinds of strange crap about non-Jews. Hollywood will never let that movie out.
#11. To: robin (#9)
I remember when the book came out all these pseudo intellectual types were forming discussion groups about it, I only knew the basic premise of the book though I knew right off what was going on. I'm not a bit suprised the movie was made, I do hope it bombs, no matter what those raving about it and promoting it say.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||