Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Were the 9/11 Aircraft Electronically Hijacked and Remotely Controlled?
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/11 ... acked-and-remotely-controlled/
Published: Nov 24, 2022
Author: Dan Hanley
Post Date: 2022-11-24 10:45:03 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 2036
Comments: 49

According to the global grassroots organization 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers website (https://911pilots.org/), there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11 aircraft but that these aircraft were electronically hijacked and remotely controlled through employment of a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer and remotely guide it to its target destination. Once engaged, the pilots cannot disconnect this system.

According to the 9/11 Commission, the alleged hijackers had never flown the sophisticated B-757 and B-767 aircraft in their lives but were mainly trained in light, single engine Cessna 172s and the like.

This would be akin to only having driven your family automobile and climbing into a huge 18-wheeler semi-tractor trailer that you had never driven before, getting it up to a very high speed, and driving it through a garage without scraping the sides of the truck or hopping into a formula one race car that you hadn’t driven before and keeping it on the track at a very high speed.

Just because one can pilot a Cessna 172 does not qualify one to pilot a large commercial jet aircraft at very high speeds. It just doesn’t work that way.

A comparison of the cockpit layout of these types of aircraft will demonstrate the ludicrousness of the official story. There is no way the hijackers could have climbed into the cockpits of the jet aircraft, interpret the instrumentation and flight navigation systems, and fly the aircraft to their designated targets.

So how did three of four aircraft flies from the point at which they were hijacked to where they flew with cruise missile precision into buildings on the first attempt in New York City and Washington, DC?

One must first review the origin and history of the remote control of large airborne aircraft before we continue.

Over 75-years ago, in 1944, toward the end of World War II, the US Army Air Corp launched Operation Aphrodite in Europe wherein old B-24 bomber aircraft were gutted out to lighten the weight of the aircraft, loaded with 30000 pounds of highly incendiary compound called Torpex, and remotely flown into targets in Europe. Pilots were required to make the takeoff but once airborne, they bailed out of the aircraft.

It should be noted that Joe Kennedy, JFK’s older brother, died on one such top secret missions when the aircraft exploded due to a malfunction before he could bail out of the aircraft.

There are other such examples of remote control of aircraft, but we will jump ahead forty years to 1984 where NASA and the FAA conducted a joint crash test experiment in a remote location using a large four engine B- 720 commercial jet aircraft loaded with only crash dummies and video cameras to test crew and passenger survivability in the event of a crash landing. The aircraft was flown by remote control several times around the traffic pattern before being intentionally crash landed.

Jumping ahead yet another ten years or so to the mid-90s, the uninterruptible autopilot system previously described was developed and produced as a device capable of remotely taking control of an airborne hijacked commercial jet and guiding to an auto landing at one of many airports in the world.

(The fact that this technology existed in the mid-90’s years before 9/11 is given by the testimony of an avionics technician who actually worked on this system that was installed on a B-757 aircraft).

Let us now take for example the hijacker of American Airlines flight 77 supposedly flown by 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker Hani Hanjour who was described as a very poor student pilot that could barely speak English, a requirement to obtain a pilot license.

AA77 took off from Washington Dulles airport headed for the west coast. After leveling off at cruise altitude for a while, the aircraft made a U turn heading back towards Washington in a descent. According to the official narrative, at 7000 feet the aircraft commenced a 330-corkscrew turn descended to just a few feet off the surface without skidding it at over 500 mph to strike the Office of Naval Intelligence with military precision on its first attempt!

Digressing, in August 2001, just one month prior to 9/11. Hanjour attempted to rent a small, single-engine Cessna 172 from the Freeway airport in Maryland but was denied rental by the chief flight instructor there, Marcel Bernard, because he could not handle the aircraft! And yet, Hanjour was able to accomplish this amazing aerial feat on his first try.

Given that the alleged hijackers were unqualified to fly the aircraft that day, one must ask how the aircraft were hijacked and flown into buildings as reported by the 9/11 Commission?

The only viable explanation that can be offered is through employment of the uninterruptible autopilot system. How else could this have been accomplished? You be the judge.

In August, 2020, a Federal Aviation Administration whistleblower report was filed via the FAA Hotline by the 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers members alleging the use of the uninterruptible autopilot on 9/11.

Initially, this federal aviation oversight agency was very receptive to the vast evidence provided and even assigned a Seattle-based FAA aeronautical engineer to handle the case until it was recognized the depth and breadth of the allegations being made.

Communications all but ceased with the exception of a few emails from the FAA that weakly attempted to refute these claims. Freedom of Information Act requests for relevant information indicated that the FAA was being less than truthful in their responses before communications ceased by this agency and the stonewalling began.

Consequently, over the next two years, letters and emails were sent, and phone calls were made to every relevant government office in Washington, including to the FAA Administrator, Secretary of Transportation, Department of Transportation Inspector General, US Attorney General, Director of National Intelligence, FBI Director, the House Government Oversight Committee leadership. even President Biden and many others without responses!

Subsequently, appeals have been made to the Pakistani, Chinese, and Russian governments to review evidence and possibly commence an investigation into the lies of 9/11. If the US government is uninterested in investigating our assertions then perhaps a foreign government will.

Hani Hanjour could not fly a Cessna 172, never mind a B-757, a fact that was known by the 9/11 Commission and the FBI but totally ignored. One must ask why the US federal government continues to ignore this case. Again…you be the judge.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Over 75-years ago, in 1944, toward the end of World War II, the US Army Air Corp launched Operation Aphrodite in Europe wherein old B-24 bomber aircraft were gutted out to lighten the weight of the aircraft, loaded with 30000 pounds of highly incendiary compound called Torpex, and remotely flown into targets in Europe. Pilots were required to make the takeoff but once airborne, they bailed out of the aircraft.

I have never, ever heard of this before and while I'll hear the evidence, it does not sound believable given there was no digital technology at the time.

Pinguinite  posted on  2022-11-24   10:50:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pinguinite (#1)

Boeing received a patent for uninterruptable autopilot in 2006 but that doesn't mean it wasn't in existence before that.

Boeing Honeywell uninterruptible autopilot

Ada  posted on  2022-11-24   12:46:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ada (#5)

autopilot in 2006

The chip was installed in all commercial aircraft in the 1990s to be activated in case of hijacking. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2022-11-24   18:22:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: BTP Holdings (#8)

To that suggestion, that simply installing a chip would make an aircraft capable of being remotely hijacked, I'd just say that a full remote control system would have to involve more than a chip. Because what's also needed is a 2-way communication system between the aircraft and the ground controllers. Controllers need to send signals to the aircraft that would be received by the RC system on board the plane, and they would need to be long range radio signals which would require a sufficient antenna to receive, and chips by themselves are not equipped with antennas. So how can a chip alone receive signals sent from at least 100 miles away? It needs access to an antenna.

A second needed component is a transmission unit on the chip or elsewhere in the aircraft to send feedback to the ground controllers so they know how to make avionics adjustments. Again, chips themselves don't have that capability, especially as it required a fair amount of electrical power to generate a signal that would need to travel some significant distance, as in, again, at least 100 miles, and even that wouldn't be good enough for a single ground control unit. Conceivably it could be done from a trailing aircraft, but it would still need a 5-20 mile range, I would say.

I would grant that it's possible for an airliner's existing radio capabilities might send sufficient info for controllers to know how to maneuver the aircraft, but that's still a question.

Furthermore, there needs to be built into the aircraft a means of disabling pilot control AND taking control. Again, a chip alone isn't going to do that. It could make the electronic decision to disable pilot controls, but what is the mechanism by which that would happen? What's also notable is that the 757 & 767 aircraft, used on 911, have cable controlled avionics, whereas the MD-380 is electronically controlled avionics, so the theory holds less weight with the 757 & 767 aircraft. Of course there are hydraulic assists with the 757 & 767 models which do leave room for some kind of electronic weak point for a remote hijacking, but that's still an extra challenge for a simple chip insert to deal with.

AirBus 380. Note the joystick controls to the left and right of the pilot dashboard. That's an electronically controlled flight system, where an electronic reading is done of the position of the joystick which is computer translated with the resulting signals sent to motors controlling the ailerons, elevators and rudders.

757: Note the large central controls. These aircraft have cables connecting the controls directly to the ailerons, elevators and rudder, albeit hydraulically assisted.

So the theory of a remote electronic takeover would work better with an airbus 380 than a 757/767.

Finally, after severing the pilot control of the aircraft, the chip would need to take over those same controls. That would required some other components be present in the aircraft that the chip would connect to, and such units would be hard to keep secret if they were on board all commercial aircraft.

Finally, the difficulty of steering an airliner into a skyscraper while flying it via remote control, without the benefit of a first person video by which to steer it, would be much more difficult, in my view, than having a relative novice on board pilot it directly with the benefit of seeing exactly where the building is.

So I'm very skeptical of the suggestion that a single chip added to an airliner would make it capable of a remote takeover. An entire RC takeover system would involve a lot more components than a single chip.

To be clear, I am quite skeptical of the official 911 story for several reasons, and the possibility it was, at least in part, an inside government operation is very significant and plausible. But the remote control take-over theory is one I don't think holds much water. To me, the gov plot to pull off 911 would involve covertly working with Islamic extremists to do the deed -- without them even knowing they were working with the CIA -- and at all times along the way, again covertly ensuring admission to the USA was approved, that they were able to get into flight schools, that the plan was being hatched well, perhaps even planting thermite into the WTC towers, but otherwise allowing the plot to go forward with the hijackers making decisions about which flights to hijack, the exact day that was chosen and all that. So in the end, the islamic extremist guys that pulled off the hijacking thought they were striking a blow to their Great Satan of US imperialism when in fact, they were doing exactly what US intelligence manipulated and tricked them into doing.

Then when it happens, there is far less to clean up in the aftermath that could give things away. The hijackers are real, OBL is real, witnesses are all incriminating them, evidence of the Islamic plot abounds everywhere, hell, the FBI doesn't even have to be any wiser, as though they weren't already corrupt.

And to top it off, in the aftermath, the CIA simply starts to dump all kinds of fake conspiracy theories on the internet that are completely bogus which adequately obfuscates and discredits by association the few theories that are spot on or close to it.

To me, THAT is a theory of a gov sponsored conspiracy that makes the most sense. If they wanted an event that would reshape the political sentiments of the American public, THAT is how they would go about making it happen.

Pinguinite  posted on  2022-11-24   19:38:21 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Pinguinite (#9) (Edited)

In order to get an absolute clear picture we would need to see the original patents for the QRS-11 gyrochip.

The ground control units can be a few hundred miles away and still take over the airliner controls.

Then we have the question of simulated air raft intercepts during that same time frame those aircraft were diverted.

It all comes back to the "dancing Israelis" in New Jersey. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2022-11-24   20:43:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: BTP Holdings (#12)

It all comes back to the "dancing Israelis" in New Jersey. ;)

And possibly Rabbi Dov Zakheim (Mastermind behind 9-11?)

Following Zakheim And The Pentagon Trillions To Israel And 911

rense.com/general75/latest.htm

I'm surprised you didn't mention him this time.

Plausibility of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated by G-PS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems

Aidan Monaghan (B.Sc., EET) Abstract

www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/AutopilotSystemsMonaghan.pdf

========================

Afterward...

Zakheim and Chabad Lubavitch Dedicate Talmud To Pentagon Memorial of 911

www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=8834

...And so the law of the Jews becomes the law of ZOG/JEWNITED STATES OF AMERICA...

...ENFORCED BY THE U.S. MILITARY

Is the Talmud the most evil book on earth?

"... The state of Israel lives in a continuous state of violence against other people (( biblehub.com/1_thessalonians/2-15.htm )), it is the most racially and ethnically bigoted nation there is, it has no moral compass whatsoever and it is the most hated nation on earth. This didn’t happen by accident, it the the consequence of a political creed called Zionism, which is very close in its political philosophy to Nazism. The races and religions of the Middle East lived together in peace till Zionism arrived. ...

The way that Zionists behave comes from their interpretation of the Talmud. The way they treat Palestinians as sub human is a cultural and religious obligation to them. So huge amounts of suffering, ever since the invention of Zionism in 1897, has been caused by this book and the way that the Zionists have chosen to interpret it..."

www.bruceonpolitics.com/2...-most-evil-book-on-earth/

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-11-27   14:22:36 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#23)

The state of Israel lives in a continuous state of violence against other people

LOL, you are correct but prove it in court. Or on Yahoo

Dakmar  posted on  2022-11-27   15:13:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Dakmar (#24)

prove it in court

funny you should mention that.

I have several things going here.

One is a video that popped up and I've been trying to watch it. Talking about the 21st Degree Freemasons being the U.S. attorneys and judges. I had heard Steve's wife mention it before:

21st Degree Mason Noahide Judges/Executioners

What has been hidden from the world for nearly 300 years is that 21st degree Freemasons have been trained to be the New World Order judges for Israel, they are the Noahide Judges.

www.bitchute.com/video/S69IrFi438X9/

then there's this:

"Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. ... Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary. Jewish courts ... will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts. The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha.... .... And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law. — Committee for Israeli Victory..."

www.willzuzak.ca/lp/gore10.html

I think from the looks of the lawlessness that abounds among the "elite", the Noahide Laws must have already started.

First heard about it from Carol Valentine about 20 years ago:

Merry Christmas, and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD!

by Carol A. Valentine

Copyright, May, 2002

May 15, 2002 -- Why have I only now found out about this? We can argue about who is most to blame, but the facts remain the same: Congress and the White House have been helping to establish a theocracy in America. That's right, in America -- the nation that used to be a land of religious freedom.

The would-be leaders of new theocracy: Want to abolish Christmas,
Call Christians "idol worshippers,"
Demand Christians give up their religion or be put to death,
Preach that Jesus practiced sorcery, worshipped stone idols, and was sexually immoral,
Want to establish a caste system in the US based on heredity and religion,
Want to force US citizens to embrace a synthesized "religion" invented for a servant class.

And now, since the advent of the 9-11 war, the would-be leaders of this theocracy are stronger than ever. Little stands between them and the realization of their plans...

"...FREEMASONS ARE NAUGAHYDES ((Noahides))

The entry Noachidae, found in the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY states the following: 'The descendants of Noah. A term applied to Freemasons on the theory, derived from the 'legend of the craft,' that Noah was the father and founder of the Masonic system of theology. And hence the Freemasons claim to be his descendants, because in times past they preserved the pure principles of his religion amid the corruptions of surrounding faiths.'

Notice how closely the Masonic symbol resembles the Star of David. Trace its outlines. It resembles one half of the Star of David. Does that make the Freemasons half-baked Jews?

So in their own words, Freemasons declare themselves Naugahydes...."

"...THE CASTE SYSTEM: JEWS ARE MASTERS, GENTILES SERVANTS

... The Lubavitchers and their Jewish establishment backers intend to set up a caste system, with Jews at the top of the heap. They'll have us believe it is God's will, of course. Here is a sample: The Ten Commandments apply only to the Jews.

At Mt. Sinai, G-D gave the Ten commandments (and hundreds of others) to the Jewish people. These laws apply only to the Jews in their special role as the world's spiritual leaders...

The Law contains two parallel (but separate) paths for the world: 613 commandments for the Jews, and 66 commandments (contained in the 7 Noachide Laws) for gentiles . . .

Non-Jews may not observe Shabbos (or holidays) in the manner of Jews . . . or be called up for a public Torah reading in a synagogue...

So here we have more of the same: The two-tier society, Jews on the top tier, Gentiles on the bottom.

These Seven Commandments (mitzvos) [the seven Naugahyde laws] are not arbitrary laws, but rather G-d's plan for Mankind . . . (The Seven Universal Laws of Noah have only been replaced for the Jewish people, to whom G-D gave the entire Torah [teaching] as their Law.

They therefore have a special responsibility--with special commandments--to be the priesthood of the world, a 'light unto nations.') (Notice that "Torah" in this context means the entire body of Jewish teachings.) ...

That's why the Jews who run the American Civil Liberties Union don't want the Ten Commandments posted in public places. The Ten Commandments are not public property -- they are owned by the Jews. Let the Gentiles eat Naugahyde Laws.

How long will it be before Jews complain of copyright infringement when Gentiles quote the Ten Commandments?

TWO-TIER SYSTEM OF LAW -- NAUGAHYDES GET BOTTOM TIER

The Noahide communities require . . . . courts of justice, led by rabbinically trained righteous judges, which will function similarly to Jewish batei dinim [Jewish courts] . . .

A search of the Talmud's Sanhedrin reveals that a Naugahyde is to be tried by one judge, on the testimony on one witness only, and is executed even if no formal admonition preceded his offense. On the other hand a Jew is tried by a court of 23, on the testimony of at least two, and executed only after formal admonition. (Footnote 5 of Sanhedrin 71b.)...

THE FINAL CURTAIN: RABBINICAL COURTS TO RULE THE WORLD

Upon seizing the reins of government, the new Noachide leaders will move quickly to implement a full agenda of reform. All economic and technological aid to the Communist Bloc, including the PLO, will be terminated immediately. Full support will be given to Israeli forces to reinvade PLO-controlled areas, with military assistance offered where necessary.

Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.

The pre-existing Noachide judges and courts will replace the existing court system of each country, and the legal code will be drastically rewritten to conform to halacha [Jewish law] .

. . And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law...

Look at this sentence from the above quote:

Jewish courts (the batei dini of the rabbis) will be granted full legal sovereignty over Jewish citizens within each country, who will no longer be subject to the authority of gentile courts.

This is no less than a plan for insurrection. The Jewish fifth column is in place; when the rabbis give the word, it will jump out and overturn whatever is left of our system of justice, based as it was on the principles of Anglo-Saxon law.

And law and order will be fully restored through the establishment of internal security measures, again in accordance with Torah law.

This is the police state, with Hasidic Gentiles used as front men, Lubavitchers as commissars..."

And by the way...

"...FUN BIRTHDAY PARTY AT SLAUGHTERHOUSE

WASHINGTON, (March 11 (JTA) [Jewish Telegraphic Agency] -- Lubavitch rabbis from across the United States and 40 countries launched their 100th birthday commemoration of the spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, by marking the six-month anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

A photo of the ubiquitous Rabbi Levi Shemtov appears in the article. The caption tells us that the memorial service/birthday celebration was held outside the Pentagon. Why are the Lubavitchers combining the celebration of a great and holy man with the service of mourning for the deaths of 125 Americans? What could these two events possibly have in common?

An American Friends of Lubavitch publication, "15 Minutes," reported that 500 Lubavitch emissaries were at the Pentagon that day. Five hundred.

Five hundred is not the fringe. Five hundred is the carpet. Once again: Why was 9-11 so significant an event for the Lubavitchers?...Now back to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

Standing Monday in the cold wind and bright sunshine across from the crash site at the Pentagon, the rabbis sang 'Oseh Shalom' and 'God bless America' at 9:38 AM, the time that the hijacked passenger plane hit the center of the American defense establishment . . . .

If you search google on "Oseh Shalom" and "lyrics," you will discover a number of translations similar to this one: "May he who makes peace in high places, make peace for us and for all Israel, and let us say, amen."

Officially, the 9-11 terrorism had nothing to do with Israel, nothing at all. Factually, however, the dream of the Reeb and his followers for Jewish world domination had everything in common with Bush's war on Islam. By this war, the Jews hope the US will annihilate Islam, the most vigorous religious rival to Judaism.

And how does "peace for Israel" relate to 9-11? Think back to the massive slaughter of Palestinians Israel has been able to effect since 9-11. There is no sweeter peace to be found than at the graveyard of one's enemy . . .

Dov Zakheim, the US undersecretary of defense and reportedly the leading candidate to become the next president of New York's Yeshiva University, quoted from the Torah and said that to 'tie the freedom of the country to the memory of the rebbe is a marvelous thing.'...

Zakheim mocks everything America has stood for by mentioning "the freedom of the country" at the Schneerson birthday party/wake. Schneerson did everything in his power to destroy Bill of Rights traditions in our country, and Zakheim violates his oath of office by endorsing Schneerson. According to "15 Minutes:" Calling America 'the greatest country in the world,' Zakheim delivered a dvar Torah (sermon), expounding on the halachic (Jewish law) requirements of a poor man bringing a meal offering in the Temple,

This is a concatenation of the bizarre. Dov Zakheim is the Comptroller of the Department of Defense.

If you do a google search on him, you will learn that he is also an ordained Orthodox rabbi, and was a contender for the presidency of Yeshiva University. And here he is, lecturing on Jewish law --- on a trivial topic -- at a birthday kickoff for the Reeb-come wake for the Pentagon victims . . .

Your search on Zakheim will reveal that he publicly deplored Jonathan Pollard's treason and incurred Israeli ire when he opposed the US production of Israel's Lavi jet fighter planes. Zakheim said the production of these planes for Israel would cost the US taxpayer billions of dollars.

Rabbi Zakheim sounds like the guardian of the public purse and quite a patriot, doesn't he?

On the other hand, Zakheim lauds Schneerson, and says that to "tie the freedom of the country to the memory of the rebbe is a marvelous thing." Rabbi Zakheim is familiar with the Reeb's work. He knows about the Naughahyde laws. He knows about Schneeron's life-long dedication to destroy the Bill of Rights, to create a Talmudist theocracy where Christians and others can be put to death for following a non-Naugahyde religion . . .

I suspect Rabbi Zakheim is not a guardian of the public purse. I suspect Rabbi Zakheim is not a patriot at all -- at least not an American patriot. DoD Comptroller Zakheim stands with his hand in the Pentagon's till. What a wonderful ruse. Perhaps Rabbi Zakheim poses as a "good Jew" publicly, but behind our backs he is robbing us blind and siphoning US tax dollars to the Lubavitchers and Israel.

Given his endorsement of Schneerson, given Schneerson's exhortation for Jewish world domination, why wouldn't Rabbi Zakheim do exactly that? You think he'd be worried about Donald Rumsfeld looking over his shoulder? Funny name, that one. Rumsfeld. RumsFELD . . . You don't suppose? Naw . . . . Now here's what Rabbi Levi Shemtov while at the March 11, 2002 Birthday kickoff-Pentagon wake:

"It was not the rebbe's[Schneerson's] goal to be Maschiach," the messiah, "but it was his goal to bring Maschiach by making the world a better place."

From Shemtov's lips, we learn Schneerson did not use "Mashiach" to mean a person, but the Jewish people. And we have already seen Schneerson's goal was bring the rule of the Jewish people over everybody on Planet Earth... That certainly would make the world a better place -- for the Jews. And the Jews are the only people who really matter. Gentiles are a different species . . .

By their own actions and words, the Lubavitchers tell us that 9-11 would have been Schneerson's dream: Their actions and words lead us to an almost inevitable conclusion: 9-11 was a Lubavitch event. That's why they "launched" the celebration of Schneerson's birthday outside the Pentagon ruins.

By their own actions and works, the Lubavitchers tell us they are the vanguard of expansion and consolidation of the international Jewish Empire. Their enforcement arm is the office of the Presidency of the United States, the US military, and Congress...."

targetfreedomusa.com/wp-c...nd-OFF-WITH-YOUR-HEAD.pdf

This two-tiered Noahide injustice system is why we have the strollers of January 6 being tortured in the gulag; Christians protesting child murder , a Jewish value (( brutalproof.net/2022/07/s...ain-groups-love-abortion/ )) being arrested, while the child murderers themselves, and Bidens, Clintons, Epstein friends et al escape all scrutiny.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-11-27   16:36:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#25)

21st Degree Freemasons

I am scared of them, Horse, what is it you kikes just keep pushing?

Dakmar  posted on  2022-11-27   16:40:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#31. To: Dakmar (#26)

me a kike? wow. that's twice in one week. not a kike. not by a long shot. to put it mildly.

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2022-11-27 17:00:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest