Title: They HID the numbers at the border, it's much worse than they're admitting | Redacted News Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKyNpkIWlZw Published:Dec 20, 2022 Author:Redacted Post Date:2022-12-20 01:12:46 by Horse Keywords:None Views:357 Comments:5
Poster Comment:
New reports show that migrants have been under-reported by 18,000%. That's a lot! How will the U.S. account for and support this massive influx? What will happen to collective living? It's a scary question! Ankle monitors under reported by 600%.
If the actual number is x, and the reported number is r, then the amount y that x is "under-reported" expressed in percent can be found as follows:
y = ((x-r) / x) * 100%
The limit of y as r goes to 0 is 100%. Therefore, as I explained before, it is not possible to "under-report" x by more than 100%, no matter how few of the actual number are reported.
The numbers are meaningless to you because they are meaningless in toto.
Edit: Added parentheses around the quantity x-r to avoid ambiguity.
The limit of y as r goes to 0 is 100%. Therefore, as I explained before, it is not possible to "under-report" x by more than 100%, no matter how few of the actual number are reported.
That's what I was trying to figure out.
The numbers are meaningless to you because they are meaningless in toto.
Even an old, crippled up HoosierHickistani gets a blind squirrel once in awhile.
y = (x - r / x) * 100%
Maybe I should put THAT on a post-it note. The reasons why women shouldn't be allowed to vote or hold office is moving way to fast for me to keep up.