Title: Tucker Carlson: Nobody talks about this Source:
Fox News URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86N4eXeIMUY Published:Jan 18, 2023 Author:Tucker Carlson Post Date:2023-01-18 15:51:04 by Esso Keywords:None Views:86 Comments:1
Jewish Billionaires Use Blacks to Oppress Others, says Indian-American Lawyer
June 1, 2020
'The problem is, Jews and Blacks work together, in tandem (I call it the "gangster nightclub model") wherein Jews act as the brains/organizers/money power, while their Blacks operate as the "bouncers"or the "muscle."'
by RS
I applaud your courageous stands, day after day, hour after hour on Twitter and other platforms, where you fight against and expose the complete and total hypocrisy of Zionist Jewish enslavement of the USA but also its use of American Blacks as their "muscle" and "shield" to get away with everything that they do to American citizenry not sharing this Jewish faith.
Being an Indian-American lawyer in New York City, I see first-hand the con-artist chicanery of the Jewish billionaires who run this city (and country) and how they, in order to avoid getting exposed, install the cruelest, dumbest, most incompetent, and unethical money and power hungry Blacks into positions of authority, (of course where a Jewish Communist is always at the top of that agency) in order to do their bidding.
Who can accuse a Black judge of being racist?
Or a black police officer of being a racist thug?
Or a black administrative government worker of violating your civil rights or being corrupt, incompetent, inefficient, or unfair?
The problem is, Jews and Blacks work together, in tandem (I call it the "gangster nightclub model") wherein Jews act as the brains/organizers/money power, while their Blacks operate as the "bouncers"or the "muscle."
The vast majority of people that these two races oppress, hurt, exploit, extort, target, steal from, threaten, terrorize, humiliate, torture are non-Jews and non-Blacks...
Dontell Jackson, a black man, says organized Jewry has deflected blame for the slave trade to whites, in order to create a sense of grievance in blacks and guilt in whites.
The author acknowledges the influence of "The Alt-Right History of the US" and absolves whites of all guilt which is a bit much. Nevertheless, this represents a noteworthy attempt by the American right to reach out to blacks and unite against the common enemy, organized Jewry and Freemasonry.
The "Civil Rights Movement" is an early example of how organized Jewry (Communism, Zionism) empowers minorities to dispossess the European Christian majority culture. Later, they weaponized women. Now, they've weaponized migrants and Muslims.
Dontell Jackson: "We [blacks] are all simply pawns to the Jews who have no other use for us beyond being a ... weapon that can be used to help destroy whites, who they see as their sworn enemies, by encouraging us to breed with them until there are no longer any whites left."
"Blacks have been purposely misled by the Jewish people who, in previous centuries, built their fortunes in the transatlantic slave trade, and who continue to manipulate and exploit us even today. Because most black people make no distinction between Jews and whites, it is easy for the Jews to evade justice and escape the blame for the wrongs that they have inflicted on our people for centuries by convincing blacks that it was the white man who did it."
--Dontell Jackson (We Thought They Were White)
From Feb 26, 2017
Jews & Civil Rights Movement
by Dontell Jackson
(Abridged by henrymakow..)
Despite the widespread public belief that the Civil Rights Movement was organized by African-Americans, the reality is that it was almost entirely masterminded by Jews as part of their agenda to undermine the stability of American society by using blacks as a wedge to divide and conquer the white majority establishment. ...
RACIAL DIVISION- COMMIE STRATEGY
On June 7, 1957, during a debate over the Civil Rights Act of 1957, Rep. Thomas Abernathy of Mississippi entered into the Congressional Record the following passage in which he quoted from the Jewish author, Israel Cohen's A Radical Program for the 20th Century,(1912) :
Att. Gen. Eric Holder, featured speaker at the Anti-Defamation League’s American Heritage Dinner on October 17, praised ADL for its historic role in fighting all forms of intolerance and helping make the federal hate crimes law a reality. He called passage of ADL’s hate bill a “marvelous step of progress” and gratefully looks forward to close and continued cooperation with ADL in hate law implementation. ADL recently announced that, having spearheaded passage of The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act, it will now lead stage two, a massive national campaign to train lawyers to become hate crimes prosecutors..."
Equal rights for all? That’s not what Holder said in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this spring. He asserted that the hate bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals, policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said, such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will benefit under this new law. (Watch video, “Holder Admits No Equality Under Hate Bill”)..."
...This spring, ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center in their MIAC advisory to the Missouri State Police warned police to be suspicious of immigration protestors as possible domestic terrorists. Holder praises ADL for such proactive vigilance. “The ADL has done important work documenting increased activity by hate groups who recruit members using virulent, anti-immigration rhetoric that they present as legitimate opinion. Such language can have a devastating effect not just on an individual, but on an entire community.”
Entire communities devastated? All ADL pro-hate law propaganda from America to Europe to Australia allege that a hate crime is worthy of at least triple penalties because it savages not only the victim but “tears whole communities apart.” Such may have occurred in some instances during post-reconstruction lynchings in the American South. But when was the last time you read of such social devastation resulting from a hate crime in America? The very worst examples of hate crimes the ADL can put forward are the namesakes of the federal bill: the brutal murders of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd. Nevertheless, these had no such devastating effect upon homosexual or black communities in Wyoming or Texas. The social devastation which ADL claims results from states failing to prosecute hate crimes is a figment of ADL imagination.
Holder says, "The stubborn persistence of anti-Semitism saddens me…" What is anti-Semitism? ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism in the U.S. State Department says “anti-Semitism” means any “strong criticism” of Israel or its leaders, or claims that the Jews had Christ killed. Holder says any such anti-Semitic "hate speech" even as “a casual joke made in private when the speaker thinks no Jewish person is listening,” is very, very bad. It “should scald the conscience of every American.” He also promises that Muslims will be vigorously protected under America’s new hate law, just as they are in Canada, Britain, France and Australia...
If there is one thing the federal hate law does not do, it is reach out to all Americans, providing equal hate crimes protection.
The only thing certain about the new federal hate law and charlatans like Holder and ADL, who helped create it and now enforce it, is that they will continue to deceive and manipulate all Americans to the benefit of only one minority: the anti-Christ Jews of ADL/B’nai B’rith International.
is it Holder's goal simply to chill politically incorrect speech?
Holder's response to a question by Sen. Jeff Sessions leads to that conclusion:
Sessions: "[A] minister gives a sermon, quotes the Bible about homosexuality, is thereafter attacked by a gay activist because of what the minister said about his religious beliefs and what Scripture says about homosexuality." Is the minister protected, is what Sessions said. Here's a portion of the answer, the testimony from Eric Holder.
HOLDER: Well, the statute would not -- would not necessarily cover that. We're talking about crimes that have a historic basis. Groups who have been targeted for violence as a result of the color of their skin, their sexual orientation, that is what this statute tends -- is designed to cover. We don't have the indication that the attack was motivated by a person's desire to strike at somebody who was in one of these protected groups. That would not be covered by the statute...
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speechhttp://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
