4um: Putin Lying: 2009-2022

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles
Title: Putin Lying: 2009-2022
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com/putin-lying-2009-2022/
Published: Jan 27, 2023
Author: EternalTruth14
Post Date: 2023-01-27 08:57:23 by NeoconsNailed
Ping List: *The hook-nosed Jew* Subscribe to *The hook-nosed Jew*
Keywords: None
Views: 3752
Comments: 106

In the pro-Kremlin “dissident right” bowel movement, we hear how Putin was forced to invade Ukraine because of biolabs and muh NATO expansion!
The truth is, this war has been in the works for decades, and just like the words of the KGB’s successor organization the Mossad, “By way of deception, thou shalt wage war.”
[video]
-------
'The pro-Kremlin “dissident right” bowel movement'! How refreshing that any notable news site dares talk that way when seemingly 99% of US corn- soy-vatives are still delusional about the once and future USSR. Yes, notable -- wikid takes the time to whine about Renegade at some length:
en.wikipedia.org/wik i/Renegade_Tribune
And how appropriate of writer EternalTruth14 (presumably the great Kyle Hunt himself) to invoke Mossad in this matter. Wonder how much the thoroughly jewed "Russian" govt is in cahoots with Tel Aviv -- the ties have to be very strong, overtly or otherwise.
Yeah, I know Mossad isn't literally the KGB's successor org. It has THREE laughably named ones in Russia. NN
Click for Full Text!Subscribe to *The hook-nosed Jew*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#2. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)
I have no doubt whatsoever that if roles were reversed and Russia had expanded westwards via the Warsaw Pact and the US had its back to the wall, it would be Russia, not the USA, that we'd be blaming for the prospect of nuclear war and one-world government. The same human nature propelling our Deep State into (needlessly) grinding Russia into a break up of controllable substates exists within Russia as well as the US.
But as is, Russia is the heroic underdog standing up to the one-world gov that the US deep state would have us live under.
Though given what are the obvious proven failings within the USA of having an election based government, we may perhaps recognize the advantage of a pseudo-monarchy as Russia sort of has with Putin. Whether by election stealing or de facto popularity, Putin will run Russia for as long as he wants to, but if that means standing up to our Deep State, central banking powers, and cultural degradation then maybe that's not such a bad thing.

Pinguinite posted on 2023-01-27 9:49:15 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#9. To: Pinguinite (#2)
You are talking about a country that masticated half of Europe in its dragon jaws till a few decades ago. Is historical memory that dead around here?

NeoconsNailed posted on 2023-01-27 20:12:38 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#12. To: NeoconsNailed (#9)
You are talking about a country that masticated half of Europe in its dragon jaws till a few decades ago. Is historical memory that dead around here?

Not at all. But Russia is no longer communist. Under Soviet rule, only party members could vote, which was about 5% of the population. Now, everyone can vote. Not that that makes it a perfectly representative government and that there is no corruption about, but it does make Russia no different than the USA. The bottom line is right now, they are an underdog and the USA is no friend to any European country. Case in point: Bombing the Nord Stream pipeline makes countries that were dependent upon Russia now without choice dependent upon US sources or US controlled sources for gas. Does our gov care about people in Europe? No. Nor does it care about Ukrainians. I'm not sure that the US of today is better than the USSR of yesterday. Both sought/seek to dominate the world.

Pinguinite posted on 2023-01-27 20:45:14 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#13. To: Pinguinite (#12)
But Russia is no longer communist.

That just takes the cake -- really does ;)

NeoconsNailed posted on 2023-01-27 21:15:27 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 13.
#17. To: NeoconsNailed (#13)
takes the cake

Russia is an oligarchy. That is just one step above them being Communist. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2023-01-28 10:18:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#23. To: NeoconsNailed (#13)
Just a little more info on your buddies...
From Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
State-sponsored glorification of Nazi collaborators

“Ukrainian extremists celebrate Ukrainian Nazi SS divisions…in the middle of a major Ukrainian city”—Anti-Defamation League Director of European Affairs, April 28, 2018
It’s not just the military and street gangs: Ukraine’s far right has successfully hijacked the post-Maidan government to impose an intolerant and ultranationalist culture over the land.
In 2015, the Ukrainian parliament passed legislation making two WWII paramilitaries—the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA)—heroes of Ukraine, and made it a criminal offense to deny their heroism. The OUN had collaborated with the Nazis and participated in the Holocaust, while the UPA slaughtered thousands of Jews and 70,000- 100,000 Poles on their own volition.
The government-funded Ukrainian Institute of National Memory is institutionalizing the whitewashing of Nazi collaborators. Last summer, the Ukrainian parliament featured an exhibit commemorating the OUN’s 1941 proclamation of cooperation with the Third Reich (imagine the French government installing an exhibit celebrating the Vichy state!).
Torchlight marches in honor of OUN/UPA leaders like Roman Shukhevych (a commander in a Third Reich auxiliary battalion) are a regular feature of the new Ukraine. The recuperation even extends to SS Galichina, a Ukrainian division of the Waffen-SS; the director of the Institute of National Memory proclaimed that the SS fighters were “war victims.” The government’s embrace of Bandera is not only deplorable, but also extremely divisive, considering the OUN/UPA are reviled in eastern Ukraine.
Predictably, the celebration of Nazi collaborators has accompanied a rise in outright anti-Semitism.
“Jews Out!” chanted thousands during a January 2017 march honoring OUN leader Bandera. (The next day the police denied hearing anything anti-Semitic.) That summer, a three-day festival celebrating the Nazi collaborator Shukhevych capped off with the firebombing of a synagogue. In November 2017, RFE reported Nazi salutes as 20,000 marched in honor of the UPA. And last April, hundreds marched in L’viv with coordinated Nazi salutes honoring SS Galichina; the march was promoted by the L’viv regional government.
The Holocaust revisionism is a multi-pronged effort, ranging from government-funded seminars, brochures, and board games, to the proliferation of plaques< /a>, statues, and streets renamed after butchers of Jews, to far-right childr en camps, where youth are inculcated with ultranationalist ideology.
Within several years, an entire generation will be indoctrinated to worship Holocaust perpetrators as national heroes.
Book bans

“No state should be allowed to interfere in the writing of history.”—British historian Antony Beevor, after his award-winning book was banned in Ukraine, The Telegraph, January 23, 2018
Ukraine’s State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting is enforcing the glorification of Ukraine’s new heroes by banning “anti- Ukrainian” literature that goes against the government narrative. This ideological censorship includes acclaimed books by Western authors.
In January 2018, Ukraine made international headlines by banning Stalingrad by award-winning British historian Antony Beevor because of a single paragraph about a Ukrainian unit massacring 90 Jewish children during World War II. In December, Kiev banned The Book Thieves by Swedish author Anders Rydell (which, ironically, is about the Nazis’ suppression of literature) because he mentioned troops loyal to Symon Petliura (an early 20th-century nationalist leader) had slaughtered Jews.
This month, the Ukrainian embassy in Washington exported this intolerance to America by brazenly demanding the United States ban a Russian movie from American theaters. Apparently, the billions Washington invested in promoting democracy in Ukraine have failed to teach Kiev basic concepts of free speech.
Anti-Semitism

“I’m telling you one more time—go to hell, kikes. The Ukrainian people have had it to here with you.”—Security services reserve general Vasily Vovk, May 11, 2017
Unsurprisingly, government-led glorification of Holocaust perpetrators was a green light for other forms of anti-Semitism. The past three years saw an explosion of swastikas and SS runes on city streets, death threats, and vandalism of Holocaust memorials, Jewish centers, cemeteries, tombs, and places of worship, all of which led Israel to take the unusual step of publicly urging Kiev to address the epidemic.
Public officials make anti-Semitic threats with no repercussions. These include: a security services general promising to eliminate the zhidi (a slur equivalent to ‘kikes’); a parliament deputy going off on an anti-Semitic rant on television; a far-right politician lamenting Hitler didn’t finish off the Jews; and an ultranationalist leader vowing to cleanse Odessa of zhidi.
For the first few years after Maidan, Jewish organizations largely refrained from criticizing Ukraine, perhaps in the hope Kiev would address the issue on its own. But by 2018, the increasing frequency of anti-Semitic incidents led Jewish groups to break their silence.
Last year, the Israeli government’s annual report on anti-Semitism heavily featured Ukraine, which had more incidents than all post-Soviet states combined. The World Jewish Congress, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, and 57 members of the US Congress all vociferously condemned Kiev’s Nazi glorification and the concomitant anti-Semitism.
Ukrainian Jewish leaders are also speaking out. In 2017, the director of one of Ukraine’s largest Jewish organizations published a New York Times op-ed urging the West to address Kiev’s whitewashing. Last year, 41 Ukrainian Jewish leaders denounced the growth of anti-Semitism. That’s especially telling, given that many Ukrainian Jewish leaders supported the Maidan uprising.
None of these concerns have been addressed in any meaningful way.
Roma pogroms

“‘They wanted to kill us’: masked neo-fascists strike fear into Ukraine’s Roma.” —The Guardian, August 27, 2018
Ukraine’s far right has resisted carrying out outright attacks on Jews; other vulnerable groups haven’t been so lucky.
Last spring, a lethal wave of anti-Roma pogroms swept through Ukraine, with at least six attacks in two months. Footage from the pogroms evokes the 1930s: Armed thugs attack women and children while razing their camps. At least one man was killed, while others, including a child, were stabbed.
Two gangs behind the attacks—C14 and the National Druzhina—felt comfortable enough to proudly post pogrom videos on social media. That’s not surprising, considering that the National Druzhina is part of Azov, while the neo-Nazi C14 receives government funding for “educational” programs. Last October, C14 leader Serhiy Bondar was welc omed at America House Kyiv, a center run by the US government.
Appeals from international organizations and the US embas sy fell on deaf ears: Months after the United Nations demanded Kiev end “systematic persecution” of the Roma, a human-rights group reported C14 were allegedly intimidating Roma in a joint patrol with the Kiev police.
LGBT and Women’s-rights groups

“‘It’s even worse than before’: How the ‘Revolution of Dignity’ Failed LGBT Ukrainians.”—RFE, November 21, 2018
In 2016, after pressure from the US Congress, the Kiev government began providing security for the annual Kiev Pride parade. However, this increasingly looks like a Potemkin affair: two hours of protection, with widespread attacks on LGBT individuals and gatherings during the rest of the year. Nationalist groups have targeted LGBT meetings with impunity, going so far as to shut down an event hosted by Amnesty International as well as assault a Western journalist at a transgender rights rally. Women’s-rights marches have also been targeted, including brazen attacks in March.
Attacks on press

“The Committee to Protect Journalists condemns a Ukrainian law enforcement raid at the Kiev offices of Media Holding Vesti…more than a dozen masked officers ripped open doors with crowbars, seized property, and fired tear gas in the offices.”—The Committee to Protect Journalists, February 9, 2018
In May 2016, Myrotvorets, an ultranationalist website with links to the government, published the personal data of thousands of journalists who had obtained accreditation from Russia-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine. Myrotvorets labeled the journalists “terrorist collaborators.”
A government-tied website declaring open season on journalists would be dangerous anywhere, but it is especially so in Ukraine, which has a disturbing track record of journalist assassinations. This includes Oles Buzina, gunned down in 2015, and Pavel Sheremet, assassinated by car bomb a year later.
The Myrotvorets doxing was denounced by Western reporters, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and ambassadors from the G7 nations. In response, Kiev officials, including Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, praised the site: “This is your choice to cooperate with occupying forces,” Avakov told journalists, while posting “I Support Myrotvorets” on Facebook. Myrotvorets remains operational today.
Last fall brought another attack on the media, this time using the courts. The Prosecutor General’s office was granted a warrant to seize records of RFE anti-corruption reporter Natalie Sedletska. An RFE spokeswoman warned that Kiev’s actions created “a chilling atmosphere for journalists,” while parliament deputy Mustafa Nayyem ca lled it “an example of creeping dictatorship.”
Language laws

“[Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk] also made a personal appeal to Russian-speaking Ukrainians, pledging to support…a special status to the Russian language.”—US Secretary of State John Kerry, April 24, 2014
Ukraine is extraordinarily multilingual: In addition to the millions of Russian-speaking eastern Ukrainians, there are areas where Hungarian, Romanian, and other tongues are prevalent. These languages were protected by a 2012 regional-language law.
The post-Maidan government alarmed Russian-speaking Ukrainians by attempting to annul that law. The US State Department and Secretary of State John Kerry sought to assuage fears in 2014 by pledging that Kiev would protect the status of Russian. Those promises came to naught.
A 2017 law mandated that secondary education be conducted strictly in Ukrainian, which infuriated Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece. Several regions passed legislation banning the use of Russian in public life. Quotas enforce Ukrainian usage on TV and radio. (This would be akin to Washington forcing Spanish- language media to broadcast mostly in English.)
And in February 2018, Ukraine’s supreme court struck down the 2012 regional language law—the one Kerry promised eastern Ukrainians would stay in effect.

FormerLurker posted on 2023-01-28 16:58:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um

State-sponsored glorification of Nazi collaborators

Book bans

Anti-Semitism

Roma pogroms

LGBT and Women’s-rights groups

Attacks on press

Language laws