[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: China Strategy: Kowtowing to Neocons or “Year of the Rabbit” 4-Dimensional Chess? Super-genius President Xi plays four-dimensional chess. I am stupid and play one-dimensional checkers. I follow Tao. What else can I do? Because of my mental limitations, certain moves by China appear incongruent to me. I understand this is the “Year of the Rabbit” and a time to lay low. However, even in that context, is kowtowing to neocons ever advisable? US neocons are waging a cold war of aggression against China that could turn warm, or even hot. To avoid conflict, China performs acrobatic contortions. When dealing with the destroyers of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, is appeasement the best policy? Or is it time for a new tact? In 2018, the “Year of the Dog,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau kidnapped Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou at the behest of his neocon masters. Breaking all rules of acceptable business practice, the kidnapping was a strong-arm move to squeeze Huawei. Using false charges stemming from Huawei’s business dealings with Iran, Canada placed Meng Wanzhou under humiliating house arrest. As if the US has the right to dictate who a Chinese company can do business with. What was the Chinese government’s response to the brazen kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou? They arrested a couple of low-level Canadians. I’m stupid. To me, that’s like getting punched by the schoolyard bully and retaliating by slapping the kid in the wheelchair. Were the two Canadian bottom-barrel flunkies supposed to represent Meng Wanzhou’s equivalent value bargaining chips? While I am no fan of big corporations, I believe Meng Wanzhou differs from the typical corporate executive. Her father started the company, and like a dutiful daughter, she helps him run it. She became corporate through birth. Through the lens of the Jungian archetype model, Meng Wanzhou is a Chinese princess. If anyone can assist in transforming the planet-degrading corporate paradigm into a system of advanced technological production harmonious with Earth’s fragile ecosystems, it’s Meng Wanzhou. Business realities aside, it is the nature of the princess to protect the orphan and widow, as well as the frog and turtle. The insult to Meng Wanzhou has never been properly addressed. My face burns with shame. The venal witch Nancy Pelosi invaded the sovereign Chinese territory of Taiwan, despite warnings from China’s government. Before the mentally diseased bat flew in, China threatened the most severe response if Pelosi carried out this disrespectful neocon provocation. How did China respond to the insult? They wasted jet fuel buzzing their planes around in inconsequential aerial maneuvers. How did the American political class view China’s response? It interpreted it as weakness. US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is talking about repeating Pelosi’s act of audacious face-slapping. (Bloomberg News) What was the American public’s perception of the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) response to Pelosi’s Taiwan invasion? Many viewed the PLA as metro momma whores. That’s not my view of the PLA. I know their rhino horn solar plexus strike can collapse a granite mountain. I’m merely reporting US public perception. Under Tao, it is considered incorrect to issue fierce threats and not follow through when the red line is crossed. If immediate action is unwise, better to say: “The proper response will be given at the appropriate time.” Or ignore the provocation. China’s airshow could’ve been a four-dimensional chess move beyond my comprehension. I’m stupid. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||