[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Paul Craig Roberts: Wake Up and Smell the Chains (of tyranny)
Source: American Free Pres
URL Source: http://n/a
Published: May 29, 2006
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2006-05-24 21:08:10 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 188
Comments: 22

Wake Up and Smell the Chains

Can America wage a “war on terror,” respect the Constitution and
make the Founding Fathers proud of us —all at the same time?

By Paul Craig Roberts
May 29, 2006 | American Free Press

The neo-conservative Bush regime has adroitly used 9-11 to create fear of terrorism among Americans that blinds them to the Bush regime’s assault on our constitutional system. Americans have meekly acquiesced to the Bush regime’s brutal assaults on civil liberties, human rights, the separation of powers and statutory law, because Americans have been brainwashed to believe that the “war on terror” takes precedence and cannot be waged under the rules established by the Founding Fathers.

By elevating its “war on terror” above the U.S. Constitution, the neo-conservative Bush regime has made itself a far greater threat to Americans than are foreign terrorists. Two constitutional scholars, Timothy Lynch and Gene Healy, document the Bush regime’s forceful assault on the U.S. Constitution in “Power Surge: The Constitutional Record of George W. Bush,” released May 3 by the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C.

Lynch and Healy show that Bush has failed in his most important responsibility “to preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution and, thus, is in violation of his sworn oath of office. The two scholars document the Bush regime’s “ceaseless push for power, unchecked by either the Courts or Congress,” on issues ranging from war powers, habeas corpus and federalism to free speech and unwarranted surveillance. Bush’s assault on the Constitution “should disturb people from across the political spectrum.”

Alas, it doesn’t. Many Americans believe that Bush’s dictatorial powers will only be applied to terrorists. This belief is extremely foolish, because it means that “the liberty of every American rests on nothing more than the grace of the White House.”

It has become commonplace to hear Americans dismiss the Bush regime’s illegal and unconstitutional exercise of power on the grounds that only those implicated in terrorism have anything to fear. These Americans need to ask themselves why, if only evildoers have anything to fear from government, the Founding Fathers bothered to write the Constitution?

If we can trust the government the way Americans seem prepared to trust the Bush regime, we don’t need the Constitution. Indeed, why is a president inaugurated with his oath to defend the Constitution if we don’t need the Constitution to protect us from our government?

If we can trust government, why go to all the trouble to have elections? Why not just get a dictator or a king, or contract with a company to provide government? The question presents itself: Are Americans guilty of treason when they turn their backs on the Constitution? Treason is betrayal of country. And what defines country? In the United States, the Constitution defines country. The Bush regime’s assault on the Constitution is an attack on America.

Moreover, it is a far more dangerous and deadly assault than a terrorist assault on buildings.

Ask yourself, gentle reader, what are we without the Constitution? Without the Constitution, how do we differ from the hapless subjects sent to Soviet and Nazi death camps? The Constitution protects our rights, and without our rights we are nothing.

It has been widely reported, apparently without causing Americans any unease, that the Bush regime has awarded Halliburton $385 million to build concentration camps in the United States. Who are to be the inmates? Certainly not terrorists. The Bush regime has proven inept at catching terrorists, and those few who are captured are kept offshore out of the reach of the courts, where they can be tortured and abused. The camps are certainly not for illegal aliens, to whom both political parties want to give amnesty and citizenship.

Concentration camps epitomize the horrors and inhumanity of the Stalin and Hitler era. Why is the Bush regime building concentration camps in America?

The Bush regime’s war on terror is the equivalent to the Nazi regime’s Reichstag fire. It serves to blind people to the real assault.

According to Bush, America is under terrorist attack because “they hate our freedoms.” But, as Lynch and Healy show, it is the Bush regime that is attacking our freedom, removing their institutional protections and making our liberties subject to the grace of the executive.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#7. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

It has become commonplace to hear Americans dismiss the Bush regime’s illegal and unconstitutional exercise of power on the grounds that only those implicated in terrorism have anything to fear. These Americans need to ask themselves why, if only evildoers have anything to fear from government, the Founding Fathers bothered to write the Constitution?

The reasons behind the Constitution- are not even uderstood in our culture any longer. For most it just means something vague about "Freedom". They have no concept about the dangers from government it was trying to limit.

Listening to "liberal" NPR the other day they had a segment in which they were asking people on the Mall in DC if they minded the NSA eavesdropping on them. The piece was chilling to me as person after person said No- and only terrorists had anything to fear. One guy was asked would he mind if the gubmint read his email? He said no and that it was worth not getting killed by a terrorist to have such gubmint snooping. The NPR piece was approving of this mindset and the one person out of like 6 who minded NSA snooping was presented as a paranoid.

It was like listening to state radio in the Soivet Union.

Burkeman1  posted on  2006-05-25   0:56:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Burkeman1 (#7)

The reasons behind the Constitution- are not even uderstood in our culture any longer. For most it just means something vague about "Freedom". They have no concept about the dangers from government it was trying to limit.

They will never understand that we have all become unwitting victims of tyranny under color of law which gives the gov't actors the right under their color of process and color of office to plunder us for all of those "administrative law" violations where there is NO INJURED PARTY IN FACT.

You signed up for the license (or some other gov't benefit such as Social Security) when you did not need one to conduct a "priveleged occupational activity" or working or under contract with gov't or some other "public" entity.

You only have your rights if you are a belligerent claimant thereof and stay OUT of their extra-constitutional administrative law venue.

WHERE IS MY WARRANT? You don't have one? WHY AM I HERE?

AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-05-25   11:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

#11. To: BTP Holdings (#10)

Many Americans believe that Bush’s dictatorial powers will only be applied to terrorists. This belief is extremely foolish, because it means that “the liberty of every American rests on nothing more than the grace of the White House.”

This is what the Bots truly believe.

Bump to the 4th you posted:

AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

robin  posted on  2006-05-25 11:17:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]