See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Out! Evil Bob! Out!!!
Source:
The "Bob Circus 3.0
URL Source: http://home.att.net/~bob.wallace/out-damned-spot.html
Published: May 25, 2006
Author: Bob Wallace
Post Date: 2006-05-25 20:02:00 by YertleTurtle
Keywords: None
Views: 350
Comments: 15
"Truth comes by conflict." ~ Hillaire Belloc "Without contraries, there is no progression." ~ William Blake I used to write for a libertarian site called http://LewRockwell.com. But no more. My archives have been erased, and on top of that, they have been erased from the Google cache, which can only happen if the owner of the site where the articles were posted requests it (I’ve already saved all of them, so not to worry). Now who could it be who did this, I wonder? By the way, over 200 articles were destroyed. 217, I think. All dropped down the libertarian version of Orwell's Memory Hole. I'm not the only one who has been banned. Jimmy Cantrell, who has a Ph.D. in English, was banned, as was Carole Ward. And all for the same reason I was: pointing out what are the real problems. Here’s what happened: I occasionally post outrageous comments at various sites, wondering what kind of response I’ll get. Call it bait. I have found out you have to push the envelope to get a truthful response from people. So I pushed it. This particular time, I made some very crude remarks about race and ethnic groups. What I said was essentially the truth, but I said it in a rather brutal way. The reason? Perception travels through the emotional brain first, to the rational brain last. Then includes you, me, and everyone else, including those who considers themselves the most egghead of intellectuals. Many of whom, in my opinion, believe some of the dumbest ideas on earth. Not only that, they're gullible and naive. What I did, I did on purpose, to bypass the rational brain. I had made similar comments before, without a peep from anyone – except for those who agreed with me. This time, finally, I got a response, and woo hoo was it one! One person in particular, a leftwing PC narcissistic homosexual named Tom Palmer (who styles himself a libertarian, but isn’t) took my comments and sent them all over the Internet to God knows who. He even made nine comments (all of them the same) on The Sudden Curve blog I write for. This is mental illness. I'm going to repeat that -- this is mental illness. Narcissistic, exhibitionistic, megalomanical mental illness. More succinctly, the behavior of a typical homosexual. In some ways I feel sorry for him, because he's fighting battles he's already lost. Anyone who thinks the public acceptance of homosexuality, which Palmer advocates, will lead to the acceptance of gay marriage and not buggering young boys, doesn't understand much about homosexuals, or much of anything, probably. Such are the wages of narcissistic self-deception, even if you do work for the (now degraded) Cato Institute, as Palmer unfortunately does. Another site, the utterly insignificant No Treason (they’re the exact opposite, what with supporting totally open borders), also posted my comments and wrote extensively about them. This is a site run by fools, knaves and cowards who make obscene sexual comments about women, including one I know. Apparently they think they're funny. They're the only ones. By the way, they've also run cartoons approving of bestiality, in the context of harassing the woman I know. No Treason is an anti-American, left-wing site that reminds me of what Jean Raspail wrote in The Camp of the Saints: they are “righteous in their loathing of anything and everything that smacked of present-day Western society, and boundless in their love of whatever might destroy it.” All of them were so dumb they didn’t realize what I was doing. I’m not surprised at anything self-styled intellectuals do. They proved what I'm been saying for years: there are leftwing libertarians and rightwing ones. The leftwing ones tend toward anarchism and confused thought. Like I said, they're gullible, and will fall for...well, a lot (anyone who thinks anything of value can be salvaged from leftism know little, if anything, about leftism). Some of the critics claimed they weren't leftists. Anyone who criticises using words such as "racism" or "homophobia" or "sexism" or "bigot" -- words that mean nothing because they can mean anything -- and truly believes in these words, is a leftist, whether he knows it or not. The comments at various sites fell into two categories: the more rightwing ones who supported free speech, and the PC leftists, who believe in Thoughtcrime. The leftists, being more narcissistic (as all leftists are) were writing about me as if I was a bad person. Not one of the leftists realized I had tricked them. After thinking about this for years, I've decided the leftwing ones (or ancaps, meaning anarcho-capitalists) have a lot of similarities with Marxists. Marx thought all the god-like qualities of humanity would blossom like hot-house flowers once the State "withered away." That's exactly what leftist-libertarians think. And if they think that, they have another think coming. What I wrote is what would really happen. I didn’t bother to defend or explain myself. I was curious as to how the whole thing would play out. And that’s how my archives were erased, including the Google cache. So, you ask, what did I write? I pointed out, in exactly one paragraph, that blacks have an mean average IQ that is genetically much lower than whites, which is why they’re on the bottom in every country of the world, including Africa. These are the facts, folks, and everyone knows it. To ignore these things is to condemn many, many Africans to poverty and death. Of course, this is something leftists will tolerate, as long as it doesn't intrude on their groovy little fantasy world. What I wrote doesn’t mean I hate blacks, which of course is what leftists will always say. It just means we need the free market so people, no matter what their IQ, can find a high-paying job and support themselves so the government won’t destroy neighborhoods, families and people’s individual lives with welfare. And I know perfectly well there will always be smart ones who will rise to the top. I also wrote that Jews have been expelled from some 80 countries – sometimes more than once, sometimes for hundreds of years – because of their attempts to destroy every culture that admits them. And under a completely free market, without government interference, many Jews will be ostracized. Everyone who is honest about it, knows this is true, too. This is a shame, because the innocent get hurt along with the guilty. But then, that, too, is part of depraved human nature. I also pointed out that the Chinese and Asian Indians have a problem with ancient, ossified cultures that have destroyed much of their creativity. After all, most everything in the world has been created by those of European ancestry, along with the free market. Speaking of Asian culture, one of my best friends is a Filipina, with whom I have discussed these problems extensively. For some odd reason, she's never banned me from talking about them, even though she says I annoy her all the time. I once pointed out to her that almost all white women don't find Asian men attractive because they don't consider them masculine. She told me Asian men already know that, but what really surprised me is that a lot of Asian women prefer effeminate Asian men. Some of the men go so far as to paint their fingernails. The biggest exception to this rule, she told me, are Filipinas, many of whom prefer white men because they like "mixing blood" and creating exotic-looking babies. Now try to discuss that on any "libertarian" site and see how many rational responses you get. There were a few things I didn’t say, such as the fact that homosexuals, who make up less than two percent of the population, are responsible for at least one-third of child sex crimes (like murder, rape and molestation) and two-thirds of all AIDS cases. So, please, don’t tell me there are no differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals. There are. Those Catholic priests molesting kids? They’re not pedophiles. They’re pederasts, which is what many homosexuals are – they like boys in their early teens. And what percentage of those priests are committing these molestations? Two percent. . .just as two percent of the population is homosexual. Interesting tidbit, isn’t it? Let's put it this way: stereotypes wouldn't exist unless there was truth to them. Or: all stereotypes are true. What didn’t I write? How about that most lesbians are man-haters? And that Islam is the worst thing that ever happened to the world, and destroyed the ancient and advanced civilizations of Iraq and Iran? And that I consider the Koran no more a holy book than I do Mein Kampf? Let’s see…what else? Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, Asians, Mexicans. and Indians. Is there anyone I didn't offend? How about those crackpot, blasphemous faux-Christian Evangelicals who think they can bring Jesus back by supporting the murder of Palestinians and the theft of their land? Oh -- I forgot – I can say that without any problem. In a very rough, general way, this is what you would get under a completely free market: whites and Asians at the top, Mexicans in the middle, blacks at the bottom, except for sports and music. Of course, this does not count for every individual. I'm speaking in generalities. And, to repeat, this doesn't apply to every individual; exceptional ones, of any race and ethnic group, can make his or her way to the top. And to repeat again: I'm for the free market so all people can make lots of money and support themselves and their families without the government interfering and destroying everything. What did I learn from this little escapade? That even libertarians, who pride themselves on their (non-existent) intellectual and moral superiority, are a primitive tribe, just like everyone else. They have taboos, ones that if you transgress will lead to expulsion. That’s what happened to me. Small "l" libertarianism as a philosophy is sound (it's the original philosophy of this country, what it was based upon). As for Libertarianism (big L), it is idealistic, leftist Utopian, and utterly foolish. Most of the people who fall for it are homosexuals, leftists who are too deluded to even know they're leftists, and potheads, and all of them are completely confused about the difference between Right and Left. Big L would no more work in society than Socialism. Facts are stubborn things, and many of your leftist libertarians don't like them at all. That's why they ignore them. Reality is malleable, you know, if you just act like the Cowardly Lion, squeeze your eyes shut, and keep repeating, "I wish, I wish." I have never called myself a pure "libertarian." I've always qualified with with "right-wing" or "conservative." One friend calls himself a "constitutional libertarian." No one I know, other than the crackpots, calls himself simply "a libertarian." The term unfortunately carries too much baggage, because of the people who have degraded the term. By the way (and this is a sad, sad thing), Lew backed down from two sites run by depraved sexual perverts. It's a shame one of his nicknames on the Internet is "Lewpus." I think you can figure out what it means. The more I thought about it the funnier it got: I was banned after attacks by a pathologically lying homosexual and a couple of guys who sexually harass women while hiding behind their website. I am reminded of a comment by John Milton: “None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license.” There's nothing like a little controversy to get people to expose their true selves. I even caught one guy using my name to make slanderous posts. Such admirable people, eh? What am I supposed to think about a "movement" with so many marginal, indeed disputable, people in it? One of my friends took the link to http://LewRockwell.com off of his site, telling me some of the writers were "fucking loons." Another no longer calls himself a libertarian, after finding out "they weren't what I thought they were." He wasn't talking about the philosophy; he was talking about the people. I have unfortunately decided that libertarianism as it stands now is completely hopeless, mostly because of the anarchism, which I will repeat, is leftist and therefore terribly destructive. I'm not saying your shouldn't read the site, or not support it. It's a needed corrective to the leftist- libertarian/anarchist/pederast brigade. But don't delude yourself that Lew Rockwell is something he is not -- a man unafraid of the truth. You want to know something? If I had to do it all over again, I’d do it exactly the same way. It was much too enlightening to want to give up what I discovered. I finally got the truth about libertarians. It wasn't very pretty, either. A lot of them are losers living in their little fantasy world, a never-to-exist world in which a nation of one-third Wahabi Muslims, one-third Orthodox Jews, and one-third fundamentalist Christians would live in peace-and-universal-brotherhood because the free market would unite them in their material lust for SUVs and DVD players. They remind me, more than anything else, of unpleasant and very immature children. All the emails I got supported me, although as I said, some of the posts I read at various forums didn't, and clearly exposed the leftist PC in way too many libertarians. Everyone of those who supported me described themselves as "right" in varying degrees. Everyone of those who opposed me described themselves as "left" or "beyond right or left." The latter viewpoint is nonsense: no one is beyond Right or Light, no more than anyone can be beyond male or female. But, again, the hate and viciousness was exclusively from those on the Left. Look at it this way, folks: the human race has advanced technology, but otherwise is still stuck in One Million Years B.C. Only there’s no Raquel Welch in a two-piece fur bikini in sight. "All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal." ~ Enoch Powell "Live not by lies." ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Poster Comment: I've never posted this here before. The story of my life...always in trouble.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: YertleTurtle (#0)
No shit! Great piece Bob. I agree 100%. You wanted truth, you got it; and you can't eat that either.
True, but I'd rather be poor and know the truth and have all the bread and circuses available and stay ignorant.
Freeper motto: "I read, but do not understand; I write, but make no sense."
Not a choice easily made for one's children, however. Was Mel Gibson's Patriot greatly wrong to be reluctant? Truth is sometimes a dish best served anonymously. "I may be a coward, but I'm a greedy little coward."
how to be banned from most forums ping!
Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism. – George Washington "If the president made us go to war with Iraq, why doesn't he go over there and fight the war?" Christian May [6th grader] They remind me, more than anything else, of unpleasant and very immature children. Very insightful, and there is alot of truth in this, too. Sounds alot like another forum called 'libertyforum' full of all types of kooky extremists. Funny mix, if nothing else. Libertarianism has a lot of logical problems. A guy by the name of Mike Huben has an entire site about the weaknesses of libertarian ideas. It's good.
"That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves." Kim Stanley Robinson, "Green Mars" p318
I ran across his site a few years ago. Some good criticisms, but a lot of them fall flat. He's an outsider. The most valid criticism comes from those on the inside and who know what the True Believers really think.
Freeper motto: "I read, but do not understand; I write, but make no sense."
Was Mel Gibson's Patriot greatly wrong to be reluctant? Truth is sometimes a dish best served anonymously. Oddly, I'm working on an article about The Patriot. Also about The Outlaw Josey Wales, BRaveheart and Rob Roy. All those movies have a common theme: men who want to be left alone in peace, who have their land invaded and their families slaughtered, and who seek revenge for having their lives destroyed. (Anyone in the administration listening as to how those movies pertain to Iraq?) Know one of the oddest things about all four films? They're about the English conflict with the Scots/Irish/Welsh, in the case of Josey Wales and The Patriot, as it was remapped onto the U.S. Everyone of the victims is Celtic, at the hands of the English. IMO, it's that self-righteous crusading Yankee mentality that led to the war between the States, and is now meddling in the world. It's why Bush is not a Texan, but in reality an East Coast Connecticut Ivy League WASP Yankee.
Freeper motto: "I read, but do not understand; I write, but make no sense."
Great story. Glad you're here. Truth is truth.
Hmmmm..I'll remember that when it happens to me/us on this site. Very enjoyable read, Bob, thanks for sharing it with us.
He's an outsider? Why the does that matter? Libertarianism plays out in real time as a Hobbesian dystopia.
"That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves." Kim Stanley Robinson, "Green Mars" p318
Well said.
For one example, he doesn't know most ancaps are homosexuals, and that in an ancap world, they'd be pushing NAMBLA as a legitimate organization.
Freeper motto: "I read, but do not understand; I write, but make no sense."
Well, yes I suppose. Libertarians seem to be retarded about child sex abuse. The libertarians I have argued with think kids are property. If a kid is your property, then you can (in their minds) have sex with them. It's f*cked up. People aren't products. The libertarians don't understand this.
"That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves." Kim Stanley Robinson, "Green Mars" p318
I've never heard that about the party party before.
Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism. – George Washington "If the president made us go to war with Iraq, why doesn't he go over there and fight the war?" Christian May [6th grader] Everything is for sale in libertopia, including people.
"That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves." Kim Stanley Robinson, "Green Mars" p318
But no more. My archives have been erased, and on top of that, they have been erased from the Google cache
The dulcimer tones of progressivism sequent to an atavistic and bloody rhythm.
#2. To: Tauzero (#1)
You wanted truth, you got it; and you can't eat that either.
#3. To: YertleTurtle (#2)
I'd rather be poor and know the truth and have all the bread and circuses available
"What are you drinking this evening, Mr. Kristol?
"Straussini. Bitten, not turned."
"Ah! A gentlemen's beverage."
#4. To: YertleTurtle, noone222, Eoghan, wbales, Lady X, Brian S (#0)
#5. To: YertleTurtle (#0)
You want to know something? If I had to do it all over again, I’d do it exactly the same way. It was much too enlightening to want to give up what I discovered. I finally got the truth about libertarians. It wasn't very pretty, either. A lot of them are losers living in their little fantasy world, a never-to-exist world in which a nation of one-third Wahabi Muslims, one-third Orthodox Jews, and one-third fundamentalist Christians would live in peace-and-universal-brotherhood because the free market would unite them in their material lust for SUVs and DVD players.
#6. To: peteatomic (#5)
Mike Huben
#7. To: Tauzero (#3)
Not a choice easily made for one's children, however.
#8. To: YertleTurtle (#0)
#9. To: YertleTurtle (#0)
Some of the critics claimed they weren't leftists. Anyone who criticises using words such as "racism" or "homophobia" or "sexism" or "bigot" -- words that mean nothing because they can mean anything -- and truly believes in these words, is a leftist, whether he knows it or not.
#10. To: YertleTurtle (#6)
#11. To: YertleTurtle (#0)
“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license.”
#12. To: peteatomic (#10)
He's an outsider? Why the does that matter?
#13. To: YertleTurtle (#12)
#14. To: peteatomic (#13)
#15. To: robin (#14)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest