[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: MADSEN: CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
Source: Wayne Madsen Report
URL Source: http://waynemadsenreport.com/
Published: May 26, 2006
Author: Wayne Madsen
Post Date: 2006-05-28 10:34:21 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 107
Comments: 18

May 26, 2006 -- What if the United States experienced a constitutional crisis and no one reported it? The recent statements by House Speaker Dennis Hastert that the Bush White House was overstepping its constitutional separation of powers bounds by allowing the FBI to storm into a member of Congress' office and then "leaking" Justice Department information to intimidate the Speaker after he publicly complained about the raid indicate that this nation is experiencing a drastic constitutional crisis. The fact that the corporate media is not reporting this crisis is understandable when one considers that social studies (once called "civics") in this nation's education system is relegated to an afterthought and our corporate media talking heads and stenographers have as much knowledge of the U.S. Constitution as anyone who has ever passed a high school GED.

Hastert was joined in his criticism of the White House by the Republican Majority Leader in the Senate Bill Frist and the House Majority Leader John Boehner. When one considers that Hastert is the third ranking constitutional officer of the United States, his stark criticisms of White House unconstitutional behavior (regardless of Hastert's possible involvement in illegal campaign contributions), exceed anything this nation witnessed in Watergate. In that case, we were talking about impeachment, partly for White House-sanctioned break-ins of Democratic National headquarters and Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office. Never once did House Speaker Carl Albert complain about the Nixon administration trying to break into the offices of congressmen. Nor did Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield or House Majority Leader Tip O'Neill ever breach such concerns.

A number of Democrats have welcomed Hastert's sudden realization that the Constitution and the separation of powers clause is now under assault by the unitary fascist executive created by the neo-cons. But some Republicans continue to support Bush. These include the core of the Christian evangelical-Ziocon alliance, most evident by anti-Hastert comments from Senators David Vitter (R-LA) and Norm Coleman (R-MN), respectively.

It is now clear, even to the Republican leadership in Congress, that the neo-cons are an anti-constitutional blight upon our nation. The true and most loyal neo-con agents of influence in Congress have now identified themselves (Vitter, Coleman, Lieberman, Cornyn, Kyl, etc.). It is high time for them and the Democrats to initiate impeachment proceedings against this criminal gang and return this nation to normalcy and democracy. Hastert has it in his power to not only eliminate Bush and Cheney through impeachment, but he can replace them as a caretaker president until the 2008 election. That would be the best outcome in an overall bad situation.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#2. To: aristeides, robin (#0)

The fact that the corporate media is not reporting this crisis is understandable when one considers that social studies (once called "civics") in this nation's education system is relegated to an afterthought and our corporate media talking heads and stenographers have as much knowledge of the U.S. Constitution as anyone who has ever passed a high school GED.

Perhaps the media isn't reporting the "constitutional crisis" because there isn't one? But there does appear be a lot of pointless posturing.

Here's the search warrant that was executed - http://www.bayoubuzz. com/jefferson_affdavit.pdf

I've read the search took so long because the FBI rather than pack up everything and take it away as they normally would do, was being more "surgical" by doing an on-site real-time evaluation of what evidence actually fit the warrant and was to be siezed.

The warrant itself, along with the $90,000 wrapped in foil found in Jefferson's home freezer (talk about your cold cash), are pretty damning.

So someone help me out here with this "constitutional crisis":

Why is Hastert (a Republican) objecting to a legitimate constitutional search of a Democrat's office.

Why was Bush (a Republican) leaning towards return of the siezed evidence in a legitimate ongoing corruption investigation of a Democrat?

This seems a case of where the FBI was doing their job, effectively and constitutionally (Legislative branch is not exempt from Executive pursuit of criminal investigations authorized by the Judiciary) and the DoJ was backing the FBI against the Whitehouse & Hastert on what seems likely further evidence of Jerfferson's corruption.

This seems a rather stupid battle in which Bush & Hastert have involved themselves.

Yes Bush and the neo-cons have been engaged in unconstitutional acts, but the perps here are not the neocons, and the FBI/DoJ seem well within their constitutional preprogatives investigating demonstrable corruption.

Starwind  posted on  2006-05-28   14:14:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Starwind (#2)

Well, what's next? Raiding the house of a Supreme Court Justice? This is a bad precedent.

FBI needs to work with Congress to get a hearing going to expel that member. Hastert is rightfully annoyed that this transpired without his knowledge.

Traficant is a good test case of how something should work. There is an investigation, the evidence is displayed before Congress, who then expels the member, and THEN the ex-member is put on trial. In the same vein, if the President is going to have charges brought against him, he needs to be impeached and removed from office first.

The gotcha is that Bush or any executive can concoct a charge in the future, raid a Congresscritter's office, plant evidence or whatnot and then demand votes by blackmail.

No, the Justice Department should have worked with Congress on this and operated by their rules.

mirage  posted on  2006-05-28   14:24:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: mirage, Starwind (#3)

Inside Out: The Abramoff Investigation and Speaker Hastert

On Thursday, Hastert did a radio interview with Chicago's WGN and said that he believes the Department of Justice had leaked the story to "intimidate" him in response to his vocal opposition to the recent FBI raid on the Capitol offices of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.): "It's just not true, you know. The Justice Department said there is no investigation, and this is one of the leaks that come out to try to, you know, intimidate people, and we're just not gonna be intimidated on it," he said. Hastert reiterated his demand that ABC News retract its story.

Some ugly goings on in the Bush Crime Family.

Hastert just never thought he could be next.

robin  posted on  2006-05-28   14:37:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: robin (#4)

Some ugly goings on in the Bush Crime Family.

Hastert just never thought he could be next.

They all get too big for their britches as some point. ;0)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-05-28   14:55:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#8. To: BTP Holdings (#6)

They all get too big for their britches as some point. ;0)

He should squeal real loud when it's his turn to sing.

robin  posted on  2006-05-28 14:57:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]