Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Health
See other Health Articles

Title: My Forty-Year War on Reefer Madness
Source: Mises.org
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/07 ... ty-year-war-on-reefer-madness/
Published: Jul 7, 2023
Author: James Bovard
Post Date: 2023-07-07 10:49:05 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 3280
Comments: 2

Forty years ago last week, the Los Angeles Herald Examiner published my first attack on the federal drug war. The previous year, the Reagan administration had unleashed its “Just Say No” program, vilifying anyone who smoked a joint, sniffed the wrong powder, or used nonapproved hallucinogens. I was mortified to see Ronald Reagan—who was elected on a promise to get “government off your backs”—double-cross his supporters with what morphed into the most intrusive scheme in American history.

Like kids everywhere in the 1970s, I laughed at the 1936 movie Reefer Madness in my high school health class. I’d occasionally smoked marijuana but hadn’t felt compelled to burn down any orphanages afterward. When Reagan went on the antidrug warpath, I was “laying for him,” as Mark Twain would say.

The Herald Examiner was a conservative-leaning paper, so I slanted my argument accordingly: “Many heavy marijuana users voted Republican in 1982, so there is no proof that it causes irreparable brain damage.” I pointed out that legalizing and taxing marijuana could raise enough money to pay for the MX missile program that Reagan championed. (Pentagon boondoggles were much cheaper back then.) Ending marijuana prohibition would put hundreds of lawyers out of work, I cheerily noted. Reagan’s drug crackdown was playing to a culture war theme which I mocked in the final sentence of my piece: “Personally, I’m all in favor of locking up hippies, but we need to find a better reason.” The editor wisely deleted that last sentence before printing the article.

My attempts at humor were not universally appreciated. When I took the page from the Herald Examiner to a photocopy shop in uptown Washington, the cranky old manager was outraged by the article’s headline: “Making Pot a Crime Is, Well, Un-American.” He railed about how drugs were destroying the nation and wagged his finger so hard he almost threw his shoulder out of joint. The real problem, he said, was troublemakers like me. I just grinned at him and found another copy shop.

Two years later, writing in the San Diego Union-Tribune, I declared, “The only things drug laws achieve is to make drugs more dangerous, crime more prevalent, and government more obnoxious.” I scoffed, “If the FBI didn’t have a thousand agents chasing dope dealers, would the Soviets be having so much success stealing U.S. military secrets?” I also whacked the Feds’ narcotic nitwittery in the Detroit News and other papers.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Excellent, thank you.

“ On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. ” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2023-07-07   11:23:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

That certainly was my own sentiment and maybe still is, but on the flip side, we do have enormous drug-using homelessness issues out on the left coast. Obviously the causes of these things are highly debatable, but there is some room for debate.

I generally favor people having free will to do what they want, but.... voting patterns of absolutely stupid people -- read: all those who voted for Biden -- make the argument that people are just too damn stupid to be deciding their own fate, and along with it, the fate of everyone else.

Pinguinite  posted on  2023-07-07   12:21:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest