[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Health See other Health Articles Title: FDA Drops Ivermectin Bombshell Doctors are free to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID-19, a lawyer representing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said this week. FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID, Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The government is defending the FDAs repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said Stop it. The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal. The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no, Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court. The FDA on Aug. 21, 2021, wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter: You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, yall. Stop it. The post, which linked to an FDA page that says people shouldnt use ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19, went viral. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
That would be the FDA practicing medicine. Even if technically permitted if the FDA body is made up of certified doctors ...if.... they would have ethical violations for making medical decisions for specific patients they have not seen or diagnosed. And if they would NOT be certified doctors, they would be practicing medicine without a license, which is a crime.
#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)
Is a government official interfering with commerce to benefit a particular company a crime? Because that's what happened.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|