[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: The West’s Blueprint for Goading China Was Laid Out in Ukraine Europe fears losing access to Chinese markets, plunging it deeper into a cost-of-living crisis. But it fears Washington’s wrath more The West is writing a script about its relations with China as stuffed full of misdirection as an Agatha Christie novel. In recent months, US and European officials have scurried to Beijing for so-called talks, as if the year were 1972 and Richard Nixon were in the White House. But there will be no dramatic, era-defining US-China pact this time. If relations are to change, it will be decisively for the worse. The West’s two-faced policy towards China was starkly illustrated last week by the visit to Beijing of Britain’s foreign secretary, James Cleverly – the first by a senior UK official for five years. While Cleverly talked vaguely afterwards about the importance of not “disengaging” from China and avoiding “mistrust and errors”, the British parliament did its best to undermine his message. The foreign affairs committee issued a report on UK policy in the Indo- Pacific that provocatively described the Chinese leadership as “a threat to the UK and its interests”. In terminology that broke with past diplomacy, the committee referred to Taiwan – a breakaway island that Beijing insists must one day be “reunified” with China – as an “independent country”. Only 13 states recognize Taiwan’s independence. The committee urged the British government to pressure its NATO allies into imposing sanctions on China. The UK parliament is meddling recklessly in a far-off zone of confrontation with the potential for incendiary escalation against a nuclear power, a situation unrivalled outside of Ukraine. But Britain is far from alone. Last year, for the first time, Nato moved well out of its supposed sphere of influence – the North Atlantic – to declare Beijing a challenge to its “interests, security and values”. There can be little doubt that Washington is the moving force behind this escalation against China, a state posing no obvious military threat to the West. It has upped the stakes significantly by making its military presence felt ever more firmly in and around the Straits of Taiwan – the 100-mile wide waterway separating China from Taiwan that Beijing views as its doorstep. Senior US officials have been making noisy visits to Taiwan – not least, Nancy Pelosi last summer, when she was house speaker. Meanwhile, the Biden administration is showering Taiwan with weapons systems. If this weren’t enough to inflame China, Washington is drawing Beijing’s neighboursdeeper into military alliances – such as AUKUS and the Quad – to isolate China and leave it feeling threatened. The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, describes this as a policy of “comprehensive containment, encirclement and suppression against us”. Last month, President Biden hosted Japan and South Korea at Camp David, forging a trilateral security arrangement directed at what they called China’s “dangerous and aggressive behavior”. Meanwhile, the Pentagon’s “Pacific Defense Initiative” budget – chiefly intended to contain and encircle China – just keeps rising. In the latest move, revealed last week, the US is in talks with Manila to build a naval port in the northernmost Philippine islands, 125 miles from Taiwan, boosting “American access to strategically located islands facing Taiwan”. That will become the ninth Philippine base used by the US military, part of a network of some 450 operating in the South Pacific. Dirty double game So what’s going on? Is Britain – along with its NATO allies – interested in building greater trust with Beijing, as Cleverly argues, or backing Washington’s escalatory maneuvers against a nuclear-armed China over a small territory on the other side of the globe, as the British parliament indicates? Inadvertently, the foreign affairs committee’s chair, Alicia Kearns, got to the heart of the matter. She accused the British government of having a “confidential, elusive China strategy”, one “buried deep in Whitehall, kept hidden even from senior ministers”. And not by accident. European leaders are torn. They fear losing access to Chinese goods and markets, plunging their economies deeper into recession after a cost-of- living crisis precipitated by the Ukraine war. But most are even more afraid of angering Washington, which is determined to isolate and contain China. That divide was highlighted by French President Emmanuel Macron following a visit to China in April, when he urged “strategic autonomy” for Europe towards Beijing. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||