[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Elon Musk at Charlie Kirk Memorial: "Charlie Kirk was killed by the DARK.."

Netflix as Jewish Daycare for Women

Warning America About Palantir: Richie From Boston

I'm not done asking questions about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

6 reasons the stock market bubble is worse than anyone expected.

Elon Musk: Charlie Kirk was killed because his words made a difference.

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: One Third of large companies read your email
Source: Reuters
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060602 ... u=X3oDMTA3cjE0b2MwBHNlYwM3Mzg-
Published: Jun 3, 2006
Author: NA
Post Date: 2006-06-03 01:34:39 by Mekons4
Keywords: None
Views: 110
Comments: 5

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Big Brother is not only watching but he is also reading your e-mail.

According to a new study, about a third of big companies in the United States and Britain hire employees to read and analyze outbound e-mail as they seek to guard against legal, financial or regulatory risk.

More than a third of U.S. companies surveyed also said their business was hurt by the exposure of sensitive or embarrassing information in the past 12 months, according to the annual study from a company specializing in protecting corporate e-mail at large businesses.

"What folks are concerned about is confidential or sensitive information that is going out," said Gary Steele, chief executive of Cupertino, California-based Proofpoint Inc., which conducted the study along with Forrester Research.

The top concern was protecting the financial privacy and identity of customers followed by compliance issues and a bid to prevent confidential leaks. Businesses ranked monitoring for inappropriate content and attachments as less important.

Steele also said on Friday that more and more companies are employing staff to read outgoing e-mails of workers who typically have no idea their correspondence is being monitored.

"It is not something that is broadcast," Steele said. "There are organizations where employees think they can say whatever they want to say and nobody is going to read it."

The survey gathered responses concerning e-mail security from 406 companies in the United States and the United Kingdom with more than 1,000 employees.

In both regions, 38 percent of respondents said they employed staff to read or otherwise analyze outbound e-mail. In the United States, 44 percent of companies with more than 20,000 employees said they hire workers to snoop on workers' e-mail.

Nearly one in three U.S. companies also said they had fired an employee for violating e-mail policies in the past 12 months and estimated that about 20 percent of outgoing e-mails contain content that poses a legal, financial or regulatory risk.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Mekons4 (#0)

Okay, for starters, if you're sending e-mails to people who are not employed where you work, you're not working when you send them, you're fucking around on the job.

I have no sympathy for that shit. More importantly, nobody should get bent out of shape if their employer is reading their e-mails because if you're sending e-mails on the company's dime, it's THEIR e-mail.

Dead Constitution? Hardly. Try more like Cry Me A Damned River.

What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2006-06-03   6:26:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#1)

I disagree. Just as one should be able to phone home and check on the kids, one should be able to send say a short confirmation message of say a doctor's appointment and things like that.

This is an invasion of privacy and if I knew where I worked was doing this I don't care how much I liked the job, I'd quit.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-06-03   6:57:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Mekons4 (#0)

People should always assume that their company emails are being read (or could be read). I saw evidence of that myself. No biggie to me as I only use private email addresses (non-company) if I have to send private messages, and my company is so screwed up that they could never figure out anything anyway.

"I woke up in the CRAZY HOUSE."

mehitable  posted on  2006-06-03   11:26:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ferret Mike (#2)

I still disagree. Your home e-mail, is your private e-mail. When you're on the company dime, you shouldn't be e-mailing a bunch of people in the first place. It's different if it's intercompany but if you're e-mailing people all over the place, expect to be scrutinized.

What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2006-06-03   12:47:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#4)

I respect your POV, but if my e mail was read and I knew about it, regardless of this being at work I'd quit.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2006-06-03   16:13:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]