Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Jewish Press Admits ‘International Plot’ To Spread Lies About Hitler And Lure ‘Gullible’ Americans Into War
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://christiansfortruth.com/jewi ... e-gullible-americans-into-war/
Published: Feb 15, 2024
Author: CFT Team
Post Date: 2024-02-15 17:12:26 by NeoconsNailed
Keywords: None
Views: 1143
Comments: 48

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency) A new book admits that a cynical misinformation campaign launched by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency against Germany was a pivotal part of plans by British Intelligence and the Soviet KGB to lure “gullible” Americans into supporting a war which they had no interest in being part of:

“…The Overseas News Agency was founded in 1940 as part of Jewish Telegraphic Agency. While ONA was designed as a straightforward news outlet, within its first year of existence the British Foreign Intelligence Agency commissioned it to produce fabricated stories.

As Religion News Service reports, the goal of the assignment was to manipulate American sentiments by painting Britain as strong in the war effort and smearing Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as unhinged.

Stories under the ONA masthead were designed to push the then-neutral United States to join World War II.

Here’s the crazy thing: It kind of worked. Even papers like The New York Times and Washington Post ran stories based on ONA “reporting.”

While these austere publications didn’t disseminate ONA’s account of Australian sharks planted in the English Channel to deter a sea invasion from Berlin, they gamely spread the ONA report that the English had devised an explosive 47 times as powerful as TNT.

As RNS reports, (((Steven T. Usdin))), author of “Bureau of Spies: The Secret Connections Between Espionage and Journalism in Washington,” discovered the international plot to mislead Americans while researching a book on Washington, D.C. spy sites.

It was on a visit to the National Press Club, where ONA had its offices, that Usdin discovered the outlet’s history of producing fake news.

“There are times where people say that it’s appropriate or OK to compromise with some kind of ethical principle because there’s an existential threat, but it’s usually not true,” Usdin told Religion News Service. “Here, it really was. I would have done it, and I would have been proud of it.”

Using the Freedom of Information Act, Usdin obtained declassified documents that suggested that Britain’s MI6 essentially had editorial oversight of the ONA.

“They just threw a lot of mud, and whatever stuck on the wall, they were happy with,” Usdin said of the ONA’s writings. “I think they also thought Americans were particularly gullible.”

“It’s important to remember that in the face of grave danger in the 1930s and 1940, JTA’s reporters in Europe were exposing the unfolding Holocaust in real time while elevating journalism to a holy calling with their bravery and determination,” Ami Eden, the CEO of (((Seventy Faces Media))), which includes JTA among its publications, wrote in a statement to the Forward..........

NN SEZ:

Yeah yeah yeah, that's Muh Holocaust -- main subject in the universe since 1939! Center of the entire cosmos from hell to earth to heaven to Skokie, Illinois! Everything else pales in comparison -- your needs, my needs, America's needs, the white race's future!

But isn't this article usefully damning? We urgently need to document the fraud of the World Wars and big H, how they came about and for what consistently evil reasons. Amurricans are indeed gullible -- hate to say it but their catastrophic loyalty to Israel is because of their religiosity. Rot in hell, C.I. Scofield.

Please note that as usual the incomparable CHRISTIANS FOR TRUTH DOT COM is working from a mainstream JEW source. Can't remember the last time it was not the case with a C4T article. The site's flow of content has slowed down, but if you'll tell somebody about it today maybe it will encourage the editor -- right sites often get bogged down with burnout or frustration as the masses gobble up "mainstream" media lies and decadence.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

Churchill accepted Jewish money to whip up sentiment against Germany. Otherwise, another war with Germany was not popular in England nor was it in the US

Ada  posted on  2024-02-15   21:44:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Ada (#4)

One of my main theses these days -- that Hitler wanted no war, especially with England, but London helped re-kill Germany for cynical economic reasons.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-16   11:16:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)

No question of it. A continuation of WW1 which started for the same reason.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-16   12:39:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Ada (#10)

I want to know more about that so I can vindicate Germany there too, if possible. Figure it's always GD envious, satanic kikes at work tearing down peoples who've built what they never could.

Patton called the Germans the best people in Europe once he'd helped grind them to a pulp -- better late than never. Don't think he ever threw his medals in Truman's face tho.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-16   17:48:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)

Some say the Jews were responsible for both WW1 and WW2.

www.linkedin.com/pulse/je...e-cause-both-world-war-2- armenian/

In the 1930s Winston Churchill's views were definitely in the minority and he received financial support from Jewish financiers.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-16   21:30:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Ada (#13)

OMG -- !!! A linkedin.com ARTICLE? And it's SEMITICALLY INCORRECT??? I can't believe my eyes. Thanks and boffo -- the things you pull out of the hat! A popup said I had to sign in to see it, but went away when I clicked the page ;)

I've heard the historical Young Turks were indeed actually kikes. The much-worshiped news show of that name is more kikey than gefiltefish. Cenk Uygur is OBVIOUSLY one, and with Ms Kasparian by his side it's a weird ooky mix to say the least. Does she care about the genocides on her Armenian ancestors?

I see it's her maiden name and that (whew, at last!) I'm not the only one to ever spot the bizarre irony:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana...g_Turks%22_name_criticism

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-17   9:57:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: NeoconsNailed (#14) (Edited)

Ms Kasparian

An name ending in -ian is Armenian.

When I worked for Illinois State Highways we had a Lead, Lead Worker who had an Armenian name. He said he "didn't care about what went on over there."

The facts are the Muslim Turks slaughtered the Armenian Christians. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2024-02-17   15:04:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BTP Holdings (#17)

Muslims are that bad, but it's true about the Young Turks etc. I have no doubt kikes created Islam to boot. It's the kike impront on Ayrab types just like Cathoholism is on white folks, notably Nediterranean types.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-17   16:32:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: NeoconsNailed (#20)

I have no doubt kikes created Islam to boot

Both Islam and Christianity are Jewish offshoots. (some say Marxism is a Christian offshoot. Mohammed came very close to accepting Judaism and would have if they hadn't screwed him over.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-17   20:51:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Ada (#23)

Nay, Chistianity is the fulfillment of Old Testament religion which has no name. Jewness is the alien imposition on it by edomites like the Herods. Kikes admit Marxism is merely another face of judaism (or judiasm as most of my compatriots have spelt it).

Interesting about Mohammed. Stalin went bad partly because the seminary he attended as a boy was run by a heathen jerk (maybe a kike?) and he was of course jew like them all.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-19   8:37:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: NeoconsNailed (#29)

The first Christians were Jewish. The congregation in Rome, for instance.

Christianity arose among the gentiles later thanks to Paul who successfully argued that the Jewish law applied only to the Jews and gentiles were not expected to follow Jewish dietary laws and other restrictions. As Jesus pointed out, the law was created for man, not man for the law.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-19   9:13:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Ada (#30)

No, they were the kikes' Israelitish victims. Bible ethnology is all messed up.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-19   17:10:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: NeoconsNailed (#31)

The Rome congregation was a troublesome lot. We can blame them for "obey your magistrates"

To describes them as kikes might be misleading as the term was not invented until the 19th century by Jews to describe their illiterate and superstitious co-religionists from Eastern Europe.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-19   19:17:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Ada (#32)

Oh God, not the magistrates again. Feel sure I've posted my treatise on that here but the Latest Articles search box isn't working for me right now.

We have to call them kikes because it's what they least want to hear. Literally every day all day they're screaming curses and insults at us with almost zero pushback.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-20   9:36:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: NeoconsNailed (#35)

Jews created the word "kike" to describe their own, so they can't object to it. True dat its sort of like "nigga", i.e., they can use it but its an insult when others do.

In the early Christian era the kikes were essentially the slave class Christians, uneducated and looked down on. The Jews, like today, were a wealthy class, powerful enough to make Pilate bow to their will.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-20   10:31:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Ada (#37)

Jews created the word "kike" to describe their own

Where are you getting that? I've been a committed jewologist for almost 40 years and have never heard that explanation. Jewy Kapedia disagrees with you:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kike

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-20   10:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: NeoconsNailed (#38)

Where are you getting that?

derogatory slang for "a Jew," by 1901, American English; early evidence supports the belief that it was used at first among German-American Jews in reference to newcomers from Eastern Europe, perhaps because the names of the latter ended in -ki or -ky.

There is no charity organization of any kind here [a small city in Pennsylvania] and, what is sadder to relate, the Jews in this city will not form one; that is, if the present temper of the people can be used as a criterion. The German Jews are bitterly opposed to the "Kikes," as they persist in calling the Russian Jews .... ["Report of the National Conference of Jewish Charities in the United States," Cleveland, 1912] Philip Cowen, first editor of "The American Hebrew," suggests a source in Yiddish kikel "circle." According to him, Jewish immigrants, ignorant of writing with the Latin alphabet, signed their entry forms with a circle, eschewing the customary "X" as a sign of Christianity. On this theory, Ellis Island immigration inspectors began calling such people kikels, and the term shortened as it passed into general use.

Ada  posted on  2024-02-20   11:28:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#40. To: Ada (#39)

I stand corrected by my own link, but you say the word goes back to the first century or two?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2024-02-20 11:45:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest