[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Resistance See other Resistance Articles Title: NN's Jew Lecture "The Bible And Taxes" -- Outline I created this talk and presented it at the two remaining Patriot Network clubs in 2022. This is the teacher's version. No time to format it here, alas, though I''ve bolded my tachygraphyic commentary, notes to self etc under each verse in the main section. Yes, I engaged in strategic hyperbole in the first numbered line of it, but not by much. What do jews have to do with taxes, you ask? If this material doesn't demonstrate that in living color, the present IRS commish is Daniel Werfel and check out these others: www.irs.gov/about-irs/previous-irs-commissioners Not all the jewnames are obvious, but many are -- Milner and variants are always a giveaway. Taxation is as much a jew scam today as thousands of years ago and MUST be exposed as such if we're ever to be free again. Feel certain I've posted this before, but as I said on our "Jewish Press Admits ‘International Plot’" page (thanks for the views and chat) I can't get 4um's Latest Articles search boxes to work, even after cleansing my puter with Diskmax and CCleaner, then rebooting -- which chases most such problems away. This edition would be an improvement on that in any case. Please don't miss the Notes at the end. The one per davidduke.com is absolutely key on the Jewish problem. NN =-=-=-=-=-=-= What Does the King James Bible REALLY Say About Taxes? Basic passage categories: A: Render therefore to all their dues A1: For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. B: Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar? B1: coin/superscription C: Doth not your master pay tribute? / Go and catch a fish Foundations: 1. “The Jews” in the NT always refers to the Jewish power mafia of the day – the high and low priests; the Herods and other kings; the scribes, pharisees, sadducees. Herodians. For the list of verses proving this beyond any doubt google “a little fun with the bible” (quote marks included). 2. From the very beginning CHRIST AND the early church often had to express themselves ambiguously – ‘to ‘speak with forked tongue’ – for the very basic reason of the dual tyranny they were under in Palestine (Rome and “the Jews”). There is of course everything right about this. 3. Literal belief of every word in the Bible would be completely irrational. It is universally known to be full of symbolism, parable, visions, poetry and veiled language. 4. We are mostly not at liberty to decide what to believe which way in the Bible. Context is everything, including such factors as historical background (sacred and secular), original meanings of words and idioms, and cross-references. Most people’s view of taxation in the Bible is lazy, mindless, cowardly: “My preacher says it, I believe it, and that settles it.” 5. Taxation is an exception to the above rule among Bible subjects – we are simply taking the text for what it says, using the King James Bible because it’s the favorite of pietists and the incurably conventional- minded from way back. start by quoting Rom 13 1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. ASK HOW MANY THINK CHRIST AND THE DISCIPLES DID SO toward the earthly powers of their day – "please be honest, nobody’s keeping track". Verse four absolutely cancels most people's cliche pro-government understanding of the clearly veiled passage. Are Biden et al God's ministers for righteousness? BY NO LOGIC OR SOPHISTRY. Do this render unto caesar first, then the natural followup Matthew 22:17-22 17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? 18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? 19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s. 22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way. Leaves it ambiguous; Now did all that money belong to Caesar? No – your wages were your wages. The phrase “my money” applied exactly back then as now. Does all money belong to the person depicted on it? Queen Eliz, FDR, AL, TJ, BFranklin, grant, hamilton, tubman, WRW, Salmon P. Chase. In usa no living person allowed! Christ’s purely strategic ambiguity couldn’t be clearer in meaning! THIS IS CRUCIAL TO THE WHOLE SUBJECT and indeed most or all Bible study: even before Jesus was born the power mafias were trying to kill him. The word ‘marvelled’ above recurs in Mark and Luke’s version of the story. Romans 13:4-7, CONTINUING THE KEY PASSAGE FROM ABOVE: 5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. 7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour. [clearly echoes render unto caesar – similarly left ambiguous! Now – who are these passages describing? If it means the Roman and Jewish governments the NT heroes were under, did Joseph and Mary sin by escaping Herod’s mass murder decree – or were Christ’s commands not in effect yet? How many OT precedents can we name – the Hebrew wives who saved their babies etc (God gave them houses, ex 1:20-22 = pharoahs decree that all baby boys were to be killed). Did the early church submit to the authorities’ orders to stop preaching? No, it defied them. Cite the REV. JOHN WALLER. OK, let’s say Paul didn’t write these passages with double, opposite meanings. Let’s take the cliché understanding of these crucial passages on its own terms, that he was only speaking of worldly powers. Then How could he have possibly meant a word of it in the light of his ringing denunciations of the PTB at other times? Tell me, was St. Stephen rendering tribute when he told the high priest and sanhedrin: Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye. 52 Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed’ before’ of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers: 53 Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it. SHOULD WE BE SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER or cowering? So tell me, should modern christians keep telling ourselves the scribes and pharisees “just wanted to preseve the OT law”, bla bla? Somebody tell me where Jesus himself busts that up. (Every time he nailed them as following “the traditions of men” instead of the Scriputres AND YET MORE SPECIFICALLY [kjv mk 7:4] “And when they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of tables. I can find no command for these things. This pro-pharisee page admits it’s the priesthood [“twisting”] “this law into a rule that all Jews should wash their hands before they eat for fear of defiling their food, and thus themselves.” www.bibleref.com/Mark/7/Mark-7-4.html (Pharisees blasphemously adding to Scripture: www.bibleref.com/Mark/7/Mark-7-4.html ) 18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. Matthew 17:24-27 24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? 25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. [Jeff Tibbetts] 27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea, and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me and thee. Does this sound at all odd – kings and their children? Do we know a few things on the subject – how about children of the last few presidents, including the despicable fratboy Bush-43. None of their children have gone to DC schools, so you know they’re privileged from the word go. Even Chelsea Clinton is evil – worked for the Clinton Foundation. STRANGERS is a fascinating word here – the great Richard Kelly Hoskins’ handy term for subversive Jews in politics, the tens of millions of hostile aliens they’re forcing on us etc. Before we proceed, who can recall for us without looking at the text WHY it says Jesus told Peter to go fish for a coin? Question for conventionals: Why didn’t he simply tell Peter “you know Judas is our treasurer, go get the money from him last year. Now tell me – did Christ and the apostles pay tribute? JESUS USED THAT WORD in questioning Peter! Incidentally, to show you how really effed up churches are today, [cite Sammet Bible trans] Romans 13:2 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. [hebrew wives] The power – is that not a curious way to identify a clearly major personage or entity? “The power”? God? The emperor? Gravity? It has the be the episcopos or church overseer, friends (wry SMILE). Note that God is our king but the Bible never ever once to him as our Emperor. Richard Burton as Tribune Marcellus Gallio in in the 1953 Hollywood feature film The Robe tells a slave “He’s the emperor – the Roman emperor, and that settles it for me. For you too!” The contrast of this with these Bible statements surely couldn’t be more extreme. Romans 13:5-6 5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. Luke 3:12-13 12 Then came also publicans to be baptized, and said unto him, Master, what shall we do? 13 And he said unto them, Exact no more than that which is appointed you. Here we come to the crux of the issue as vainly thought of and ‘misconscrewed’, Archie Bunker word, by the amerikan sheeple at large: what is your fair share of taxes? Jesus and Paul never said the one thing everybody thinks: pay whatever the govt says you owe. Tax collectors’ corruption is no different now than in Christ’s time. He’s condemning it here – connect the dots. This is our golden ticket to modern American tax freedom, because it echoes these other verses and the Patriot Network’s longtime motto Pay what you owe, don’t pay what you don’t owe, and learn the dif. Now then, who decides what we owe? The fedgov and state DORS of course, but it HAS to be in the light of the original bodies of constitutions. These laws, backed up by numerous court rulings HOLD UP THE NEWSPRINT BOOK are STILL entirely in our favor, believe it or not, if the public at large will only read, learn and demand their rights! SUPPLEMENT 1: “Authority” per Zondervan Illustrated Bible Dictionary PDF: media.oiipdf.com/pdf/2c65...284-9639- 060836549ab1.pdf authority. The legal and/or moral right to exercise power, or power that is rightly possessed. In the Bible God is presented as the ultimate, personal authority and the source of all authority. All exercise of authority in the created order, by angels or human beings, is therefore subordinate and derivative. The important statements of Daniel (Dan. 4:34-35; cf. 2:21; 7:13-14) and Paul (Rom. 13:1) point to the sovereign, final, and incontestable authority of God, Creator, Judge, and Redeemer over and in his creation. Thus, the Lord exercises power as the One with authority...... The NT also recognizes other forms of authority as delegated by God and Christ. There is the authority of the state (Rom. 13:1-7), of the apostles as unique pillars of the church and recipients of divine revelation (Lk. 6:13; Eph. 2:20), and of the husband as head of the family (1 Cor. 11:3). In each case the exercise of power is to be within the will of God, and the one exercising authority must be mindful that God is Judge. The possession of authority and power by SATAN (Lk. 22:53; Col. 1:13) has been abused and will be punished. Cite the famous 3 forms of govt in the bible! For 2nd month continuation: as we read the following, please imagine that it has a title “church life and ecclesial discipline” – please tell me anything included that can’t easily be thus interpreted. Note the context: [as you go: custom = same as now e.g. on foreign goods. If a synonym for taxes as in some other Bible instances, so be it. ‘sword’ could easily be a metaphor – ever heard of “applying the board of education to the seat of learning”? SUPPLEMENT 2: Romans 13, full KJV text www.biblegateway.com/pass...rch=Romans+13&v ersion=KJV 1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. 5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. 7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour. 8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. 9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. 11 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. 12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. 13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. 14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof. Notes The only reason Americans are tax slaves is because they choose to be. If even 20% of them decided to claim their Constitutional and natural rights as is their American birthright, the tax thieves would soon be out of business. Wikipedia has an entire long article titled ‘Taxation as theft’! Rothbard is quoted: "Just as no one is morally required to answer a robber truthfully when he asks if there are any valuables in one's house, so no one can be morally required to answer truthfully similar questions asked by the state, e.g., when filling out income tax returns." son Jewish immigrants to the United States from Poland and Russia – he grew up in nyc. [HIS GRAVE CONFEDERATE FLAG] I give credit where due...... In a taped sermon on contemporary attestations of Christ, D. James Kennedy rightly called the Talmud a “malign” source as it obscenely curses Christ and is otherwise despicable despite the “wise” sayings often attributed it to in in Readers Digest fillers ad nauseam. And it’s the Talmud – not the Bible – that the priests, scribes, pharisees et al were forcing on the populace in Christ’s time. They brought it back from exile in Babylon, their character and doctrine already heavily polluted by it (Neh. 1). Neither Christ, his parents, the disciples, apostles nor the population that produced them were Jewish. Because of repeated references to “the Jews” persecuting the church in the NT etc., the phrase airtightly cannot refer the above parties. This is a 100% consistent pattern in the article mentioned under Foundation 1 at the top of this paper, its URL davidduke.com/a-little-fun-with-the-bible/ I repeat: all mentions of jews in the NT ARE PEJORATIVE/CRITICAL/EVIL REPORTS. Jesus was a Galilean Israelite, not a Jew, and there’s a huge difference. Google "thank god my savior was not a jew" for a treatise on it by the late Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr. it’s rather windy but the best source I can find just now. Judaism is based on the Talmud – NOT the Torah as most people think. The religion of God’s people in the OT is NEVER GIVEN A NAME in it! Its proper name today is HEBREWISM. I worked in one of the major synagogues of NJ and can tell you it’s 99% socio-political subversion of the community and nation around them, 1% religion – if that. One Yom Kippur the Rabbi’s entire sermon was a promotion for Alan Dershowitz’s then-new book ‘Chutzpah’. Wikipedia: “Chutzpah.... is the quality of audacity, for good or for bad. It derives from the Hebrew word ḥuṣph (חֻצְפָּה), meaning "insolence", "cheek" or "audacity". Thus the original Yiddish word has a strongly negative connotation but the form which entered English as a Yiddishism.... has taken on a broader meaning, having been popularized through vernacular use in film, literature, and television.” And believe you me, it’s the original Hebrew sense the Chosen are majoring in these days, and have since the end OF the exile to Babylon and Assyria. I promise you that today ‘chutzpah’ means for the jews FORCING THEIR WAY THROUGH GENTILE INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIETIES, forcing their will on them through money shenanigans and so forth. In conclusion the Bible, while full of incomprehensible and often repellent nonsense, nevertheless had among its authors true and enlightened lovers of liberty – and still serves as the ultimate authority on it in the world. People live by their favorite secular books, music, movies etc.: fictional characters are in many cases their top heroes and the spinners of their dreams. Whether Christ ever actually lived or not he is still pointing the way to righeousness and order for modern individuals, nations and institutions. Since America is founded on Christianity right down to the original charters of early counties and cities, Americans absolutely must follow God’s law in these things as partly articulated by Christ. It’s no fundy pipe dream – America must get back to God if it is to survive; its Baal priests and emperors must figuratively summoned to a great banqueting hall and burned to death with its incineration, cf the valiant acts of Jehu, tenth king of the northern tribe of Israel in 2nd kings chapter 10. Those scenes are definitely in the Scriptures for a reason. Thank you for hearin’ me out and I hope I haven’t bored you too badly. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)
To a Jewish audience all things belonged to God.
You've got a great sense of humor.
_____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
I suspected as much but not completely sure/
I suspected as much but not completely sure
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||