[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Big Win For Iraqi & Houthi Fighters; Israeli Port Declares 'Bankruptcy' After Attacks

Tim Pool Makes Trump Prosecutor MELTDOWN & Timcast IRL Lives In Her Head Rent Free! Hilarious Clip!

Do THIS With 3 Fruits for REGROWING Stem Cells! | Dr. William Li

37-Year High Jump Record Broken, Highlighting the Difference Between Men and Women

Bill Gates Launches Maggot Milk to Replace Dairy

Sir Patrick Vallance calls for net zero to have immediacy of search for Covid vaccine

I LOVE BIDENOMICS!

Douglas MacGregor Uncovers: Egypt Could Join War With Israel - Iran Warns of 'Destructive War

5 DESSERTS That REGENERATE Stem Cells | Dr. William Li

Klaus Schwab Says Humanity Must Be Forced Into Collaboration With Globalist Elites

Chicago Has 1/3 Of Americas Holiday Murders

Harriet Hageman Proposes Amendment To Defund UN International Organization For Migration

'Israel' kills Palestinian detainees from Gaza after their release

Israeli white phosphorus shells burn 1,250 hectares of Lebanese soil

Turkish military advances 15 km into Iraqi Kurdistan, triggering mass evacuations

Rudy Giuliani Disbarred By New York State Court. Does New York Have ANY White Judges?

Biden Flies Deported Cameroonians BACK To US, And That's Not All!

JPMorgan Warns 86 Million Customers: Prepare to Pay a $25 monthly fee for Checking Accounts

Saudi Crown Price Keen to Develop Iran Ties Following Pezeshkian's Election, State News Agency Says

Social Security is underfunded by $175 trillion. The "wealthy" will need to pay 7x US GDP in taxes to keep it solvent

n: Jul 08 07:41 Israel's worst post-Oct 7 intel failure

'We Don't Accept People From Your Country': Vietnamese Cafe Refuses Service to Israelis

House to expose TSAs airport fiasco with Cuban agents as Latino vote up for grabs

Gold Star Wife NUKES Joe Biden

Biden and his delegates to the DNC

Netanyahu Sabotaging Deal With Hamas By Issuing List of Demands

Supreme Court Ruling Downgraded January 6 From Insurrection to Trespassing, says Legal Expert

War on Gaza Causing Surge in Terrorism Recruiting, Says US Intel Official

This is what STRENGTH looks like (Trump Vs Biden in Afghanistam)

Gaza_ The Astounding Parallels with 9_11


Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: [LWAN]: Suing for Rights? Response to Larry Lewis Plea / Idaho Case
Source: LWAN
URL Source: http://www.cjmciver.org/cgi-bin/lwanread.cgi?2006-06-06
Published: Jun 6, 2006
Author: Neil McIver
Post Date: 2006-06-06 15:13:42 by Neil McIver
Keywords: driving, ssn, rights
Views: 86
Comments: 2

In answer to my plea to assist Larry Lewis in his Idaho Supreme Court case, I received several emails questioning the wisdom of attempting to sue for a driver license in the first place.

Tom's reply sums it up:

----

I just read this article this morning regarding the folks up in Idaho who are STRUGGLING to obtain a drivers license. They're even praying to the Lord to get one of these things! Why is this? In EVERY state in the union, driving is defined as a commercial activity. Driving is the professional activity of transporting goods or paying passengers upon the streets and highways for a living. I just emailed you a letter I wrote back in February to the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Director. This letter describes very clearly what I have done here in New Mexico. Twice now, since I returned all of the MVD junk back to where it came from, I've been pulled over and ticketed. And twice now, ALL charges have been dismissed. The next case that will have my name on it will be titled "[Tom] v. the State of New Mexico." Now I'm going after them.

----

Tom takes what I call the "brute force" approach. Exercise the right to "drive" come hell or high water. (For lack of a substitute term I'll use "drive" and "driving" as it's commonly understood by most people, and not in denoting only commercial activity as Tom explains).

I was actually expecting to get a few responses like these. Those who've followed my accounts know I drove without a license for 5 1/2 years after failing to obtain a license from Pennsylvania without an SSN. Though I went through an extensive 10-month letter writing campaign with the PA DMV and state representatives (even copying the state police that I was driving with no license), I did not file suit to attempt to force PA to issue me a license.

Being deprived of a driver license over something that has absolutely nothing to do with your driving capacity makes you think a lot about whether it's a right or, as all are taught from our youth, a privilege, with only the importance of safe operation cited in explanation. Yet the same could be said for firearm ownership which remains a right.

Yes, I firmly believe driving is a right. This is because driving is accepted as *THE* primary means of transportation by Americans throughout the 50 states. Without the ability to drive, most homes would be impossible to maintain as a domicile. People would be unable to go to work, buy groceries or clothing, seek medical care or carry on a myriad of personal activities which would require the property be abandoned. Does the state contend it can arbitrarily force people from their homes and impose mass chaos by suspending the driving "privilege" for all? If driving were truly a privilege, then they would indeed have that lawful power. No, driving in this day and age is a right.

I believe the best measure was put on paper in a small case in 1929 which I've plastered at the top of my web page:

The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty.... It includes the right in so doing to use the ORDINARY AND USUAL CONVEYANCES OF THE DAY; and under existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 1929 (emphasis added).

So it's simple. If a means of conveyance is a common means of transport, then its utilization is a right. By 1929, the automobile was recognized by that court as common means of transport for the average person, and was therefore considered a right. It was no less a right than riding a horse and for the same reasons. One hundred years from now, the right might apply to operations of jet scooters and flying saucers.

Though like other rights, it can be abused to the point of causing harm to others, at which point it can and should be forfeited. This means utilizing the roadways that the government maintains (but does not own) in the manner in which they were designed, such as driving at a speed no faster than that certified safe by road engineers for a particular stretch of road (which nowadays may or may not be the same as a given posted speed limit).

Back to Larry Lewis. He's got a case before the Idaho Supreme Court suing to get permission (a license) to do something without an SSN that he already a right to do. And here I am, fully believing that driving is a right, supporting him financially in his case and asking others to do the same.

It is a bit of a strategic legal dilemma. I actually articulated this paradox on the ACLS http://yahoogroups.com discussion forum just a few months ago (search on americanchristianlibertysociety), about suing to obtain permission to exercise a right without an SSN. Which strategy/philosophy is best? Is one inherently misguided?

I never wrote about in but while living in PA years ago I tried to buy a modest .22 rifle. PA requires a background check, which at the time required disclosure of an SSN. The state police refused to do the background check without an SSN, so I was refused the sale of the rifle. I wrote some letters arguing a few points, the first one being they were in violation of the federal Privacy Act of 1974. I could have sued but declined, as it occurred to me I was suing to have a background check done on myself as a condition of owning a firearm. Or stated nicely, suing to force them to violate my 4th Amendment right so I could be allowed to exercise my 2nd. Does that make sense? I decided it didn't.

Much more recently, one Michael Stollenwerk sued PA over being denied the sale of a firearm and won on the same Privacy Act argument I'd advocated by letter. So was he wrong for filing suit, or was I wrong for NOT filing suit? I don't think any of us would disagree that Mike's efforts have been positive for us, so it seems he was right and I was wrong.

There are arguments on both sides of this fence, folks, but the bottom line here is that we're all on the same side. It's that simple. Because Larry Lewis is on my side, I want to help him. He's worked hard over the last 3.5 years on this issue to take down a part of the beast. If he wins it's that much better a world for everyone. The alternative is to cheer on the DMV of Idaho and I'm choosing NOT to do that. I also don't want to sit idly by while he's there asking for help.

So... yes, I'm going to help him because I know just a little bit of what it's like (one small benefit from my experience) I'm going to show him that he's not alone. $100 won't kill me, and I've spent more money in much worse ways.

That's my place. My best goes to Larry for his case on Thursday.

Neil Subscribe to *LWAN*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Neil McIver (#0)

There are arguments on both sides of this fence, folks, but the bottom line here is that we're all on the same side. It's that simple. Because Larry Lewis is on my side, I want to help him. He's worked hard over the last 3.5 years on this issue to take down a part of the beast. If he wins it's that much better a world for everyone.

I agree. I'll help!

christine  posted on  2006-06-06   17:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Neil McIver (#0)

Thanks for sharing these arguments, including yours regarding LWAN. I'm grateful some are willing to be on the front lines.

No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. – James Madison

robin  posted on  2006-06-06   17:34:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]