I disagree. It was made in a lab just as this New and Improved bird flu was..
What was made in the lab is not what they tested for.
The PCR test, again, their gold standard, as Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, said, it was not suited to that purpose.
He specifically said that using his Nobel Prize winning PCR Test, one could find anything in anyone. One scientist accurately likened it to going through someone's pockets, finding a piece of lint, and then coming to the "scientific conclusion" that the person owned a textile factory.
As to the virus, you yourself could have and still can, contact the CDC, NIAD, etc. and ask for a "copy" of the "virus." They cannot nor never have provided one to any clinic having asked.
In fact, late in 2020, there was a huge clinic out in Californis that had about 1,500 tested patients. They were awaiting the template of the virus so that they could compare them all to it. They never got it and were told that it did not exist.
Ergo, there was no real "virus" that actually spread. What spread was a narrative. Somewhere somewhere there may have been something, but it was anything but widespread.
So when people tell me that they had, got, or have "Covid," I ask them how they know since there isn't one test out there that tests and compares it to a true copy. They say that they "tested positive." They just don't get it.
There's nothing to test positive for. The tests are ALL categorically bogus.
Rappaport, Gary North, and several others prominent in alt-media exposed this fairly early on and in an ongoing basis throughout the psyop.
There's plenty of material if you're interested in further study on it.
I simply don't think that whether or not there was is all that pivotal anymore. It's kind of like what the cause for WWs I or II was, it's not a driver for a solution these days. The Central Banking Cabal and the Global Company Store model is far more relevant to any solution. Even there people are far from understanding the magnitude of it all.