I too read with prejudice. Then without prejudice so I don't know what is true.
I'll throw this out there though. First I don't care for Alec Baldwin.
From what I know about the case it seems to me that he shouldn't be guilty of a crime. Someone else gave him the gun in a movie set. He had no reason to believe it was a loaded weapon. So if there isn't something I am missing I would say not guilty at this point.
In terms of standard gun safety, all firearms are to be handled as though they are loaded even when known to not be loaded. Baldwin had the weapon in hand, and was responsible for it.